Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

to close = touching?

its not touching 2-3mm room there

if I rotate the comp so the cooler piping follows the rail there's yeap's of room

the outlet is the widest part of the comp so it gives the least amount of clearance in its current orientation

Hello guys,

first of all i ask you nicely not to shoot me as i know what most of the answers to my post will be "use search'

Because this topic is 290 pages long with a lot of usefull information and also a lot of bullshit i'm going to ask a few question, because after reading about 40 random pages i don't have found the aswers yet.

To the point:

I'm currently building an rb20det for my r32, i'm looking for a nice budget turbo for ages! Everytime i come across this kinugawa turbo.

But i don't seem to find out wich i have to chose!

I'm looking for around 400HP (crank) and yes i've got all the supporting mods.

The key thing is i don't want to go cheap topmount or tubular manifold, so i'm stuck with the stock manifold (no discussion about this please!)

The downside of the stock manifold is restricting size of the turbo and INTERNAL WASTEGATE, wich seems to be crap on the kinugawa turbo's.

So finaly my question:

Wich turbo will FIT lowmount stock manifold? (fitting spacer isn't a prob)

Are the internal wastegate's really that bad????

Wicht turbo will give me enough power?

I really hope to get FINALLY the answers i need because i'm building this shit for 2.5 years now and deff need a turbo and get the car back on the road.

quick speclist:

Rb20det

Stock pistons and rods (used)

New oem piston rings

ACL main and con bearings

ARP headstuds

1.3mm cometic steel headgasket

ARP rod bolts

extended oildrive collar

ported head

rb26 oilpump with reimax internals

600cc injectors

r32gtr fuel pump

sard FPR

Greddy e-mange ultimate

z32maf

upgraded cooling etc.

stock manifolds

stock valve train setup

stock cams

Are you more interested in making the full power, or as much response as possible?

I personally am a huge fan of 16G6s on a stock RB20, at least if you are after a good usable power delivery - but the ones with the TD06 compressor cover, not the "bolt on" housing option. If I were doing a stock RB20DET on stock manifolds, this is personally what I'd go for: http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/Kinugawa-Billet-Turbocharger-Bolt-On-3-Anti-Surge-RB20DET-RB25DET-TD05H-16G-8cm-/271457770181?pt=AU_Car_Parts_Accessories&hash=item3f3424dac5. There is some debate on their flow, but I view them as an honest ~40lb/min compressor which should get you an honest "400hp @ crank" on a setup which is working well.

It'd probably be worth giving the wastegate port a little bit of opening up to avoid creep as they can do it, and it's not hard to take a bit of meat out of it - the flapper is big enough so cover a bit of opening up. I don't rate 18Gs from what I've seen of them, they don't seem to offer a worthwhile amount more flow than the 16G but lag increases enough that you'd hope for a worthwhile increase. Haven't seen any results of the billet wheel, but logic would have it that its going to be at least as good as the cast wheel given it's the same design with a little bit less hub area (ie, a bit less inertia, a bit more usable volume for pumping air).

stock gasket here with arp studs and close enough to 500atw. im sure stock will be just fine

that's the spirit - no point changing something that works well from factory..

if only our R32/33/34 all had yamaha motors.. 2JZ will happily make over 400kW unopened, stock cams, stock gears, stock everything really

that's the spirit - no point changing something that works well from factory..

if only our R32/33/34 all had yamaha motors.. 2JZ will happily make over 900kW unopened, stock cams, stock gears, stock everything really

Fyp.

Oh and yamaha only did the head

Fyp.

Oh and yamaha only did the head

and who doesn't like head?

It proves they did it right, stock cams/valves and it's capable of 400kW+ (900kW according to zebrah) without any valve float business to worry about. If only Supras were more affordable I would be in one.. but sad reality is, they're not affordable.. at that price point I rather a GT-R because more tits

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • No, you're wrong, and you've always been wrong about this. The Nismo has 2 sets of openings. One is a real 2-way, and the other is a 1-way. There is no 1.5-way possible with the ramps that they offer. A real 1.5-way does exist. That Cusco stuff I posted is a prime example. If the forward drive ramps are, say 55°, and the overrun ramps are, say, 30°, then you will get about half as much LSD effect on overrun than you do on drive. It is real, it realy works. OK, you're slightly right. The Nismo has 55° and 45° ramps on the 2-way, so it does offer less LSD effect on overrun. But, I think that just means that they've (probably) sensibly established that you do not want actually equal LSD effect on overrun. You just want "quite a lot, but not quite as much as the drive LSD effect".
    • Just wanted to unearth this and post my baby with the new front ❤️😝 Took her to my wedding rehearsal today. Next up is getting wide skirts (after wedding)
    • Yea, that is what I was getting at in my ramblings too. The nismo one actually is a 1.5 way and a 1 way. They don't do a *2* way because a true *2* way would have equal ramp angles. Or is that a true 1.5 way? Realistically I think a "1.5 way" does not actually exist. A diff can either lock in two directions or one. It also doesn't help that a LOT of people in Australia speak about 1.5 way diffs are referring to their 1 way diff.
    • Well, the trouble with that ^^ is: The configuration shown is absolutely a 1-way, not a 1.5-way. There is no way that a 1.5-way can be said to offer LSD action only on acceleration. If Nismo cannot get that right, then it is impossible to believe their documentation. That ^ is not a 1.5 way setup. That is a 1-way.   And so now I have allowed all doubts to flourish and have gone back to look at the MotoIQ video. I originally made the mistake of believing him when he said "this is a 1.5-way" at the ~6:10 mark. Because what he did was take the gear assembly out of the 2-way opening and just rotate it one place to the left to drop it into the 1-way opening. When he dropped it in there, the cam was "backwards" compared to the correct orientation shown in all other photos of that config. The flat shold have been facing the 1° ramp side of the opening, not the 55° ramp side. And I thought, "gee that's cute", but I was concerned at the time, when he put the other ring back on, that the gap between the rings looked like it was wider then in the 2-way config. And then I said a lot of things in my long post on Tuesday that could only make sense if the guy from MotoIQ was correct about what he'd done. BUT... I have now done my homework. I grabbed a frame of the video with the 2-way config, and then grabbed another with the "1.5-way" config, snipped out the cam and opening of that frame and just pasted it direct on top of the 2-way config. I scaled it so that the triangular opening was almost exactly the same height in both. AND.... the gap between the plates is wider with the cam installed in the triangualr opening backwards. That is.... it cannot go together that way. There would be massive force on the plates all the time, if you could even reassemble it.  So, My statement on the matter? The Nismo diff is actually only a 2-way and 1-way. There is no 1.5-way option in it, regardless of what they say. Here's a photo of a real 1.5-way ramp opening from Cusco (along with the 1 way option). And the full set of 1 through 2 way options from their racing diff, which is not same-same as what we'd typically be using, but...the cams work the same. A little blurry, but it comes from this Cusco doc, which is quite helpful. AND.... Cusco do in fact do what I suggested would be sensible, which is to have rings that do 1 and 1.5, and 1.5 and 2. Separately.  
×
×
  • Create New...