Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

to close = touching?

its not touching 2-3mm room there

if I rotate the comp so the cooler piping follows the rail there's yeap's of room

the outlet is the widest part of the comp so it gives the least amount of clearance in its current orientation

Hello guys,

first of all i ask you nicely not to shoot me as i know what most of the answers to my post will be "use search'

Because this topic is 290 pages long with a lot of usefull information and also a lot of bullshit i'm going to ask a few question, because after reading about 40 random pages i don't have found the aswers yet.

To the point:

I'm currently building an rb20det for my r32, i'm looking for a nice budget turbo for ages! Everytime i come across this kinugawa turbo.

But i don't seem to find out wich i have to chose!

I'm looking for around 400HP (crank) and yes i've got all the supporting mods.

The key thing is i don't want to go cheap topmount or tubular manifold, so i'm stuck with the stock manifold (no discussion about this please!)

The downside of the stock manifold is restricting size of the turbo and INTERNAL WASTEGATE, wich seems to be crap on the kinugawa turbo's.

So finaly my question:

Wich turbo will FIT lowmount stock manifold? (fitting spacer isn't a prob)

Are the internal wastegate's really that bad????

Wicht turbo will give me enough power?

I really hope to get FINALLY the answers i need because i'm building this shit for 2.5 years now and deff need a turbo and get the car back on the road.

quick speclist:

Rb20det

Stock pistons and rods (used)

New oem piston rings

ACL main and con bearings

ARP headstuds

1.3mm cometic steel headgasket

ARP rod bolts

extended oildrive collar

ported head

rb26 oilpump with reimax internals

600cc injectors

r32gtr fuel pump

sard FPR

Greddy e-mange ultimate

z32maf

upgraded cooling etc.

stock manifolds

stock valve train setup

stock cams

Are you more interested in making the full power, or as much response as possible?

I personally am a huge fan of 16G6s on a stock RB20, at least if you are after a good usable power delivery - but the ones with the TD06 compressor cover, not the "bolt on" housing option. If I were doing a stock RB20DET on stock manifolds, this is personally what I'd go for: http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/Kinugawa-Billet-Turbocharger-Bolt-On-3-Anti-Surge-RB20DET-RB25DET-TD05H-16G-8cm-/271457770181?pt=AU_Car_Parts_Accessories&hash=item3f3424dac5. There is some debate on their flow, but I view them as an honest ~40lb/min compressor which should get you an honest "400hp @ crank" on a setup which is working well.

It'd probably be worth giving the wastegate port a little bit of opening up to avoid creep as they can do it, and it's not hard to take a bit of meat out of it - the flapper is big enough so cover a bit of opening up. I don't rate 18Gs from what I've seen of them, they don't seem to offer a worthwhile amount more flow than the 16G but lag increases enough that you'd hope for a worthwhile increase. Haven't seen any results of the billet wheel, but logic would have it that its going to be at least as good as the cast wheel given it's the same design with a little bit less hub area (ie, a bit less inertia, a bit more usable volume for pumping air).

stock gasket here with arp studs and close enough to 500atw. im sure stock will be just fine

that's the spirit - no point changing something that works well from factory..

if only our R32/33/34 all had yamaha motors.. 2JZ will happily make over 400kW unopened, stock cams, stock gears, stock everything really

that's the spirit - no point changing something that works well from factory..

if only our R32/33/34 all had yamaha motors.. 2JZ will happily make over 900kW unopened, stock cams, stock gears, stock everything really

Fyp.

Oh and yamaha only did the head

Fyp.

Oh and yamaha only did the head

and who doesn't like head?

It proves they did it right, stock cams/valves and it's capable of 400kW+ (900kW according to zebrah) without any valve float business to worry about. If only Supras were more affordable I would be in one.. but sad reality is, they're not affordable.. at that price point I rather a GT-R because more tits

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...