Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Either the gear shifter is lower in height or the throw (so the distance between each gear) is shorter, or both of these things. It depends on the brand.

Personally i'm not a big fan of them and find the throw to be short enough the way it is.

Try not to be to quick with your shifting with a 25 box as they are a strong box but the syncros dont like it when you bash it from 2nd to 3rd, found that out myself, now my shift between 2nd and 3rd needs a slight pause or it grinds like 10 grinding things.

Mark

man up and get a c's kit phil.... you wont regret it

I'll be honest, I havn't felt a genuine C's one before. But I have felt a couple of no name ones and I think one that was a Nismo one and didn't really find it any better.

from memory, the Nismo one is not as short as the C's, IIRC Nismo = 15% short, and C's = 30% - wouldn't quote me on that though :ninja:

anyone tried one with a getrag 6? - i miss the RB25 box in comparison to the getrag :(

from memory, the Nismo one is not as short as the C's, IIRC Nismo = 15% short, and C's = 30% - wouldn't quote me on that though :ninja:

Nismo have two types, 10% and 25%. The 10% feels like a tighter stock shifter.

i have had a nismo 10% and it was pointless...

i have been running genuine c's kits in both my cars for a couple of years now and they are WELL worth the $

short definite shifts

Made my own short shifter with the standard one. Got rid of the rubber and cut it to the length I wanted and welded it up etc etc. Pretty happy with it, probably nowhere near as good as the big name brands (don't know havent ever felt one) but its alot better then standard, being solid and shorter.

So I'm happy considering it cost nothing :) C's short shifters I've heard are really good but. If I was gonna spend my money on a short shifter thats what I'd get

got a cees short shift in my track car.... i now also have f**ked syncros in 3rd and 4th..

if i had my time again with the same box i probably would not have used one.

felt great.. amazing even.. for the first 6 months. after that it got worse and worse to point where it now is un usable. im about the pull the box apart.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...