Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Had 225's on my 9.5s, perfect amount of stretch for a streeter going for stanced/aggressive look, but awful in the way of grip/handling/comfort. 265 will bulge slightly, assuming you are running 9.5's all round, 265s on the rear, 245s up front IMO. Feel free to disagree but on the rears you want grip for launch and power to wheels, fronts you need to be able to steer - where I believe 265's will be too large and only hinder turning capabilities.

Exactly the opposite of what i want :P

Look isnt a major concern, the car is built to function the best it can for a street nugget... It runs 235/40 and 265/35 now but i do have some understeer and i would rather balance the car with rubber instead of counteracting it with the swaybars (If that makes sense??)

Richo who is prepping his car for the WTAC and other time attack events runs the biggest tyres he can on all 4 corners.

He runs 285's on all four in his lil R33 Gts-t :)

Yep that i what i was thinking! Maybe its not ideal for street use which is fine, ill run 2 sets of rims.... Being a street car though it has to maintain pretty standard guards!

I want to get them rolled and pulled out to give me some extra room.... Just seems everyone that has run a 9.5 on the front has stretched a tyre and made it MOAR low :/

because racecar :P

:yes::woot::banana:

I'd be curious to see how you go with fitting 9.5's at the front with a 265 tyre.

At the track I had a 8.5inch +35 offset on a 245/40 tyre and it was still hitting the guard on tight bumpy corners.

Out of curiousity what tyres will you be running?

In any case I'm planning on going a 9.5inch + 22 offset rim + a 25/30mm hubcentric spacer at the front 265/35 tyre (AD08 or AD08R) ill just get some GTR guards to make it fit!

I see. I know I don't have the best of knowledge in these situations, but the theory I was going with was fairly right yeah?

Richo who is prepping his car for the WTAC and other time attack events runs the biggest tyres he can on all 4 corners.

He runs 285's on all four in his lil R33 Gts-t :)

I'd be curious to see how you go with fitting 9.5's at the front with a 265 tyre.

At the track I had a 8.5inch +35 offset on a 245/40 tyre and it was still hitting the guard on tight bumpy corners.

Out of curiousity what tyres will you be running?

In any case I'm planning on going a 9.5inch + 22 offset rim + a 25/30mm hubcentric spacer at the front 265/35 tyre (AD08 or AD08R) ill just get some GTR guards to make it fit!

Yeah fitting GTR guards would solve my issues but they look shit on a GTT and so much needs to be changed to suit.... Unless you do the rear guards too it looks silly....

I run an 8.5 now with a 235/40 tyre and do hit when hard braking + bumps and steering BUT i am raising the front of the car by about 10mm as its sitting too low according to Mr SK...

Tyre choice is yet to be made, i want to make sure it can be done before i get too excited and go but stuff!

Worst case ill run the nats on the size i have now but would prefer to have some grip to make up for the lack of driver skill :laugh:

I'd be curious to see how you go with fitting 9.5's at the front with a 265 tyre.

At the track I had a 8.5inch +35 offset on a 245/40 tyre and it was still hitting the guard on tight bumpy corners.

Out of curiousity what tyres will you be running?

In any case I'm planning on going a 9.5inch + 22 offset rim + a 25/30mm hubcentric spacer at the front 265/35 tyre (AD08 or AD08R) ill just get some GTR guards to make it fit!

What part of the guard was it hitting?

Only reason I say, is a 245/40 has a larger diameter then a 265/35.

I had the same issue on my evo, I ran 245/40R18 on it, and everytime I turned it rubbed the front guards. I changed to a 255/35 and it was perfect, even with stock guards. As soon as I went to a 265/35 it started rubbing on the back, so I needed to roll the guards, BUT it didnt rub on the fronts as the diameter wasnt as big....

What part of the guard was it hitting?

Only reason I say, is a 245/40 has a larger diameter then a 265/35.

I had the same issue on my evo, I ran 245/40R18 on it, and everytime I turned it rubbed the front guards. I changed to a 255/35 and it was perfect, even with stock guards. As soon as I went to a 265/35 it started rubbing on the back, so I needed to roll the guards, BUT it didnt rub on the fronts as the diameter wasnt as big....

Was that on your GTR rims?

Actually, from memory i think Kurtis is running 255/35 up front on his GTT... But i think that is on a 18x8.5 rim?

Hmmm interesting.... The Tridon says it flows more etc etc.... Not sure if the triple pass radiator changes the way the cooling system operates or not?

Yeh see that claim annoyed me. The thermostat isn't usually fully open, it shouldn't need to 'flow' more than the factory item. It's a simple thing that does a simple job, there doesn't need to be anything complex about it. If you are getting overheating issues, it's highly unlikely to be because your thermostat can't flow enough coolant. And comparing the two side by side, I couldn't see how they justified that claim anyway.

As for the radiator, are you sure yours is a triple pass not a triple core? My understanding was that triple pass radiators required the inlet/outlet to be on opposite sides, yours are on the same which tells me it must be a dual pass... Also, not that it matters too much, but just read this while looking for pics of your rad:

They look similar on the outside but this is a triple pass radiator, i found cheaper Koyo rads etc but after talking to a few people it seemed the N flo was a good design as it keeps the water in the radiator longer etc....

This doesn't make much sense to me... The coolant is in a closed system. So if it's in the radiator for longer then it is in the engine for longer, which can only increase temperatures.

Yeah fitting GTR guards would solve my issues but they look shit on a GTT and so much needs to be changed to suit.... Unless you do the rear guards too it looks silly....

I run an 8.5 now with a 235/40 tyre and do hit when hard braking + bumps and steering BUT i am raising the front of the car by about 10mm as its sitting too low according to Mr SK...

Tyre choice is yet to be made, i want to make sure it can be done before i get too excited and go but stuff!

Worst case ill run the nats on the size i have now but would prefer to have some grip to make up for the lack of driver skill :laugh:

If your understeering, have you tryed looking at alignment?

Some more positive castor, a little bit of toe out at front might do the trick... (provided you have sticky rubber!)

Was that on your GTR rims?

Actually, from memory i think Kurtis is running 255/35 up front on his GTT... But i think that is on a 18x8.5 rim?

Yes, on my old R34 GT-R rims. I also used to run 255/40/17 SemiSlicks on some old R33 GT-R Rims. They used to rub a little on the rear as well.

Yeh see that claim annoyed me. The thermostat isn't usually fully open, it shouldn't need to 'flow' more than the factory item. It's a simple thing that does a simple job, there doesn't need to be anything complex about it. If you are getting overheating issues, it's highly unlikely to be because your thermostat can't flow enough coolant. And comparing the two side by side, I couldn't see how they justified that claim anyway.

As for the radiator, are you sure yours is a triple pass not a triple core? My understanding was that triple pass radiators required the inlet/outlet to be on opposite sides, yours are on the same which tells me it must be a dual pass... Also, not that it matters too much, but just read this while looking for pics of your rad:

This doesn't make much sense to me... The coolant is in a closed system. So if it's in the radiator for longer then it is in the engine for longer, which can only increase temperatures.

Its what i was told by Racepace, its an Nflo which equates to a triple pass radiator i think?

And yeah i guess that makes sense in regards to the Thermostat too, what brand is the Nissan Genuine one? (I mean who manufactures them for Nissan?)

If your understeering, have you tryed looking at alignment?

Some more positive castor, a little bit of toe out at front might do the trick... (provided you have sticky rubber!)

Alignment was good! Front was a tad too low but in terms of setup it was pretty spot on!

I have a lot of positive camber and also have toe out ;) Got that covered BUT i dont have sticky rubber........ And some asshole sold my wheels and tyres :P :P

Yes, on my old R34 GT-R rims. I also used to run 255/40/17 SemiSlicks on some old R33 GT-R Rims. They used to rub a little on the rear as well.

Should have been MY 34 GT-R rims you nugget! They were black too! :no:

Its what i was told by Racepace, its an Nflo which equates to a triple pass radiator i think?

And yeah i guess that makes sense in regards to the Thermostat too, what brand is the Nissan Genuine one? (I mean who manufactures them for Nissan?)

Ahhh quick google search showed me Koyo's NFlow design, clever system. So yeh, triple pass would work.

As for OEM thermostat; Hitachi... Maybe? Don't quote me on that, I can't actually remember. Probably just had Nissan stamped on it.

Maybe you should try something SLIGHTLY wider...?? 245/35/18?? In a nicer compound?

Alignment was good! Front was a tad too low but in terms of setup it was pretty spot on!

I have a lot of positive camber and also have toe out ;) Got that covered BUT i dont have sticky rubber........ And some asshole sold my wheels and tyres :P :P

Should have been MY 34 GT-R rims you nugget! They were black too! :no:



Haha, Well, I bring my rims back to maitland in two weeks, so we should try them on your car.. (they arnt sold yet!!)

Well with the R34 rims, you didnt want them at the time! Bet your kicking yourself now!!! I actually thought those rims suited the evo too... quite nice.

Edited by Tonba

Yeah fitting GTR guards would solve my issues but they look shit on a GTT and so much needs to be changed to suit.... Unless you do the rear guards too it looks silly....

I run an 8.5 now with a 235/40 tyre and do hit when hard braking + bumps and steering BUT i am raising the front of the car by about 10mm as its sitting too low according to Mr SK...

Tyre choice is yet to be made, i want to make sure it can be done before i get too excited and go but stuff!

Worst case ill run the nats on the size i have now but would prefer to have some grip to make up for the lack of driver skill :laugh:

Interesting about the height of the car and SK Comments

I've read that too and discussed it with Richo once as his car was quite low last year

I think his theory was something along the lines of it would probably work if your were into touring cars and riding every single high bump then maybe too low isn't good? Me no know, maybe Richo will read this post :P

But being low seems to work for Richo

What part of the guard was it hitting?

Only reason I say, is a 245/40 has a larger diameter then a 265/35.

I had the same issue on my evo, I ran 245/40R18 on it, and everytime I turned it rubbed the front guards. I changed to a 255/35 and it was perfect, even with stock guards. As soon as I went to a 265/35 it started rubbing on the back, so I needed to roll the guards, BUT it didnt rub on the fronts as the diameter wasnt as big....

Interesting

Yeah was rubbing on the outside of the tyre hitting the middle of the guard im pretty sure

Ahhh quick google search showed me Koyo's NFlow design, clever system. So yeh, triple pass would work.

As for OEM thermostat; Hitachi... Maybe? Don't quote me on that, I can't actually remember. Probably just had Nissan stamped on it.

Yeah that setup :) Post that shit in here so i can see :P

Hmmm, still leaning towards stock thermostat at this stage.

i have a smaller profile at the rears and i get the SLIP light at speeds above 100. 235/40/18 and 265/35/18

Nope you have another problem man as what you have is the same rolling diameter, i have run the same size as you for years and had no issues! Are you sure you werent just doing a skid? :P

Maybe you should try something SLIGHTLY wider...?? 245/35/18?? In a nicer compound?

Haha, Well, I bring my rims back to maitland in two weeks, so we should try them on your car.. (they arnt sold yet!!)

Well with the R34 rims, you didnt want them at the time! Bet your kicking yourself now!!! I actually thought those rims suited the evo too... quite nice.

Yep that is an option too! The RSR were just cheap shit for now!

We NEED to try them on the car so let me know when they are coming and organise a day to bring them round and have a BBQ etc? Or i can bring the car to yours and do the same? either way sort that shit out!

And yes, i am a dumb ass! :P

Interesting

Yeah was rubbing on the outside of the tyre hitting the middle of the guard im pretty sure

EXACTLY what was happening too me. Rolling diameter was too large for my wheel alignment. I bet if you tried a 245/35 or a 255/35 that rubbing would go away.

Yeah that setup :) Post that shit in here so i can see :P

Hmmm, still leaning towards stock thermostat at this stage.

Nope you have another problem man as what you have is the same rolling diameter, i have run the same size as you for years and had no issues! Are you sure you werent just doing a skid? :P

Yep that is an option too! The RSR were just cheap shit for now!

We NEED to try them on the car so let me know when they are coming and organise a day to bring them round and have a BBQ etc? Or i can bring the car to yours and do the same? either way sort that shit out!

And yes, i am a dumb ass! :P

Haha, sounds good mate. Im back for 4 days in 2 weeks time. We should catchup and do it. Bring your car over on the 17th, stay the night and we can play with it on sunday the 18th?

Interesting about the height of the car and SK Comments

I've read that too and discussed it with Richo once as his car was quite low last year

I think his theory was something along the lines of it would probably work if your were into touring cars and riding every single high bump then maybe too low isn't good? Me no know, maybe Richo will read this post :P

But being low seems to work for Richo

Being low in the 34 throws out the geometry of the suspension i think, the centre of gravity is out, bump steer issues, coilovers bottom out (they are only cheap stuff too).... There was quite a bit too it and i am probably giving all the wrong info BUT simple answer was to set the ride height about 8-10mm higher than it is now... Which will still look good and if it helps with handling then its win win!

I think it will reduce some scrubbing!

Lol be good to get some feedback from Richo actually ;)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...