Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi Trent,

Can you confirm what pump / pumps people have run through these sensors?

If someone has run twin 044's (600lph) with no problems then that's proof enough for me.

Id prefer to avoid the cost and risk of alot of additional fuel connections.

Cheers.

ps series haltechs will also do it, we have set up the Autronics (6-8 months back) now too even though we were told it wont work :P

Will the ps haltech do it with a zeitronix or do u need their sensor & can device?

as long as the ps haltech can take a digital input, any sensor will be fine - and to be honest, i don't even know if you need the digital sensor? a 0-5v might be do-able? but yeah, digital input... you're sweet afaik

OK random question, but I want to confirm just from posts I've seen from Australians on other forums on this topic - with these flex fuel setups are you only using it for Flexfuel type blends? So to run E60-E90 type range... or are you able to run straight un-alcoholic 98 up to E85?

OK random question, but I want to confirm just from posts I've seen from Australians on other forums on this topic - with these flex fuel setups are you only using it for Flexfuel type blends? So to run E60-E90 type range... or are you able to run straight un-alcoholic 98 up to E85?

I'm personally running anything from straight 98 to E90 or so.

Cool, thats what I thought - I've tuned a car to do 98->E90 thinking there was no reason not to, and it seems to do everything I want it to without too much issue so was surprised to read that and thought I'd see if there was something I'd missed, or if there was something other people had hit issue we haven't - or haven't yet :)

it's people getting confused with some of the terminology, of which people like Caltex have made it a little confusing...

FlexFuel in itself is not a fuel (as i'm sure you know) - it's a term referring to the ability of a car to run a mixture of anything really (obviously not diesel/gas) without requiring the user to do anything with the car. Set and forget.

Caltex called their high E% blend 'EFlex' which has confused some people... as it's got the word 'Flex'.

Either way, it seems United has their very own ethanol plant in QLD which seems to explain their greater roll-out i guess. But it seems the base stock is not crop by-product as it was with Manildra and CSR when United was using CSR ethanol. This some-what reduces the benefits of E85 from an environmental perspective if this is the case for United. I'll need to look into it more....

  • 2 weeks later...

man this was a good read, was meant to hand in my last assement. Soon as i get some funds might be heading up to VIc how long did the process take it wouldnt be a drop in the morning pick it up next day thing would it?

  • 5 months later...

Thread bump.

Looking at doing this with the HR 31. Not looking for silly power but a cheaper fuel bill.

Link g4 seems to be the go. However I do not have the option of a plug in unit due to the age of the car.

I have purchased a second OEM ecu that I intend to scrap for the case and connectors so i can make a plug in setup.

Engine is the original red top RB20 NICS item - bog stock. Trans is a 4 spd auto that is externally controlled.

Now the questions:

Which G4 do I need ? Looking at storm seeing as it has wiring that I can terminate into the OEM plugs

Flex sensors. There look to be two of them. Which one do I need?

I realise the link runs an internal map sensor will it run an EXTERNAL one? I have no where to bring a vac line in without drilling holes.

NICS intake solenoid - this is obviously capable of running them- correct?

Pump. I realise that this needs to change. Any idea what fits in the stock spot with twice the flow?

Injectors , been told GTR yellow tops will do the job and drop in with a hose tail mod. Will these be big enough if I decide to swap to a rb25 turbo?

Can I get a workable data stream out of this? Looking at doing a trip computer (think hks camp.) for it and would like the data to display on it. The hand held items out for now as this screen needs to display a camera and GPS.

--

Ideally I would like to retain OEM drivability whist being able to use a cheaper fuel.

Thoughts welcome.

Chris,

Calorific content of ethanol is lower than petrol so the general guide is you use about 20-30% more ethanol by volume to get the same power output. In actual practice it works out costing roughly the same:

http://news.drive.com.au/drive/motor-news/ethanol-put-to-the-test-e85-v-e10-v-premium-unleaded-20110205-1ahgx.html

As for fuel lines, I really doubt you'd have any problem with the hard lines. It's the rubber lines that suffer, older cars weren't ethanol-safe. You may need to run new fuel lines that are alcohol resistant, anything current that has an SAE marking stamped on it will be. I bought some recently that was SAE30 R7, and it is rated for immersion in fuel (ie, inside petrol tank). Not necessary to get immersion rated for under-car stuff of course .

I'm also planning an E85 experiment with my car, I am upgrading turbo, ECU and injectors and aiming to get the same driveability and fuel consumption as previously on PULP as well as the same fuel spend as PULP on E85. But have the benefit of more power (should go from 180rwkw currently to 230-250rwkw).

Geoff

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
×
×
  • Create New...