Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

1327563505[/url]' post='6205179']

M35 does have a factory Bov. Similar or same as gtr Bosch units.

Hay, where is it, I couldn't find it on my car. Got a picture?

My engine bay is one page back.

thanks.gif

I assumed he was asking about a nm35 when he said v35 , since no v35's are factory turbo.

"Yes but what are you saying? "

I was simply pointing out he could use a GTR bov as a cheap option if he didnt have one.

Edited by Ross

I assumed he was asking about a nm35 when he said v35 , since no v35's are factory turbo.

"Yes but what are you saying? "

I was simply pointing out he could use a GTR bov as a cheap option if he didnt have one.

Oh..........thats cleared it up! The problem is pluming it in somewhere.

Between the intercooler and AFM and plumbed back to the bend just after the mushroom.

Pipe goes right underneath so pretty easy.

yup....so why haven't you done it on the V35 yet? :P So are you saying to cut into the HKS cast alloy pipe?....I'm not sure Alex will want to do that and any further up the pipe might affect the AFM signal!

yup....so why haven't you done it on the V35 yet? :P So are you saying to cut into the HKS cast alloy pipe?....I'm not sure Alex will want to do that and any further up the pipe might affect the AFM signal!

He likes the flutter.

I'm a bit at a loss as to where to put a BOV. We all know that if you vent to atmos, it makes you a phag, as well as messes up the AFM readings, BUT, thats with the AFM just after the air filter. With an AFM all the way near the TB, I don't know what effect positioning will have? I have to qualms about drillin the pipe - if it stops compressor surge! ATM its not effecting me much, cause I'm not putting the boot in!

Might wait a couple of weeks, and have a look at the HKS 350z that should be coming on a cruise. I think he has a BOV.

Edited by PN-Mad

I'd put the BOV on the underside of the pressure side pipe; just in front of the throttle body. This keeps everything out of sight.:ph34r:

You could then pick up the turbo intake pipe directly below; weld a nipple in at a 30 deg angle, providing a nice merge into the intake pipe. Better yet; weld your nipple into the intake pipe so you get straight shot at the compressor wheel.

Its a great idea Dale, but there is stuff all room there. I'm running about 4 or 5 hoses in the area already.

What I really need to know is does it matter being before or after the AFM?

Just sorted out the front bar, that fits on nicely now, and also fixed up a little wastegate issue. Tomorrow I'm going to chuck it back up on the hoist and check for leaks. Also hope to mount up my trans cooler, fit some long lost swaybar bushes, and make sure everything is tight, and also take some pics

Question to you guys - What do you want to see photos of? Is there anything in particular, or I'll just take some general snaps of the whole thing?

Its a great idea Dale, but there is stuff all room there. I'm running about 4 or 5 hoses in the area already.

What I really need to know is does it matter being before or after the AFM?

Just sorted out the front bar, that fits on nicely now, and also fixed up a little wastegate issue. Tomorrow I'm going to chuck it back up on the hoist and check for leaks. Also hope to mount up my trans cooler, fit some long lost swaybar bushes, and make sure everything is tight, and also take some pics

Question to you guys - What do you want to see photos of? Is there anything in particular, or I'll just take some general snaps of the whole thing?

Fair enough; sometimes hard to gauge space in pics. :blush: Hadn't thought about the AFM position; but you won't be feeding it unmetered air so it should be fine.

Good to hear it's all working well; must be encouraging.:thumbsup: You STILL haven't fitted those swaybar bushes?:blink: Me either; lol...

Pics; LOTS of pics.

Edited by Daleo

Fair enough; pics are a little deceptive. Hadn't thought about the AFM position; but you won't be feeding it unmetered air so it should be fine.

Good to hear it's all working well; must be encouraging.:thumbsup: You STILL haven't fitted those swaybar bushes?:blink: Me either; lol...

Pics; LOTS of pics.

Bushes went missing for about 10 months or so... the Mrs "filed" them. I came across them in the Garage about a fortnight ago! Couldn't believe my luck rolleyes.gif

Copy that on the pics....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...