Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

The Asians are loving them Billy!

Working in the CBD I'm seeing more and more appearing literally by the week. All on tampon taxi's with a million f**king teddies across the back windscreen and a driver that can barely see over the dashboard.

Sounds about right. They're a complete waste of money though.

I❤BRZ plates are available. The inner little girl in me is screaming out that I should buy them. But alas, I think I might fly under the radar with this car, I've owned too many personalised plates. PULSE.R on the Pulsar, GTT4DR on my R34 and CUBE.3 on my ummmm... CUBE3. Please convince me I shouldn't buy them.

I'd get them. Would look better than some standard issue plates.

oh.

i want an evo.

drove one on sunday, a blue evo 6. 212kw. at all four.

felt much quicker than my 200. i want one.

the end.

Dooo eetttt! lol

^ this man he knows

should have taken you in my car was at 235kw *le sigh* I miss it

Would seriously consider one. Tune on e85 with some Injectors 20psi would be great. Nick I heard how much you sold yours for. I could kill you for not telling me

20psi? haha try 25psi for daily duties, mine was on 24psi

they run insane amounts of boost..... I know built engines that daily on 32-36psi

Yeah I picked it up cheap too, but price was shit due to the km's on car. However they were pretty much all highway cause of where I live

Apparently it's frequents Lygon like crazy now too, few people I know always see it there.

i dont think i'de actually get a 6 though.. probably 8 or 9.

IMO stay away from late 6.5 and 7s they tend to have weak rods for some reason

early 6.5 are fine but I'm not sure exactly when they changed the rods in them, but if your going to build engine doesn't matter

And the rods are fun to about 240awkw anyway

But go from a 7 on wards, the ecu's can be remapped instead of needed a piggy back or standalone ecu like the earlier models (you can mod a 7 on wards ecu into earlier models however)

But 7 on wards do feel less 'race' oriented while driving, much more refined car so its a better streeter

Aaron I'm much the same: 8, 8MR, or 9 ftw. Will have to see what the prices are like in a bit over a year though... 8 so much more affordable than the other two atm :S

Edited by kaitoukid

in a year and a half ill be looking at buying something nice to drive around in..

choices are R34 GTR, E39 M5 grow up, buy a house and and get married or someshit lol

An e60 will be a better option in a few years e39s are all fkd already massive kms great car but won't be worth it in a few years

I'd say stuff cars set up your future I pissed so much $$$ away on cars could have been in a way better position now but eh hindsight

imo 8s look horrible unless they have a nose chop, but they need a badge in the middle too

viiibumpercutout1.jpg

katchupevo03.jpg

i like the clean look of the 9's too..not much of a fan of all the holes and vents all over the 8's either, but keep it standard, just a tune. maaaaann

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...