Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I wonder how much labor voters know about the labor party, I mean they haven't returned a surplus since 89! Some people who voted for them wouldn't have been alive the last time they achieved it!

anyway

Mad weekend of footy!

i don't know why i thought it was a duke?

haha sadly i still don't have the skill (and possibly the power, noob two fiddys - but mainly the skill/balls) to wheelie :'(

--------------------------------------

in other news,

http://www.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/1lv6qk/whats_your_bestworst_cockblock_or_clamjam_story/

many lulz

I can wheelie but can't really hold it

similar than a duke, italian but bit cheaper than their street fighter - did I mention it's a funner bike to ride too? ;)

You have to ride naked?

yes indeedy

Edited by UNR33L

I wonder how much labor voters know about the labor party, I mean they haven't returned a surplus since 89! Some people who voted for them wouldn't have been alive the last time they achieved it!

anyway

Mad weekend of footy!

agreed, good weekend of footy.. mostly underdogs getting up

With not a single policy what a joke.

Thankgod for liberal.

#comeatmebutthurtlaborlovers

they have more policy than the sports party that got in for WA.

The objectives of the Australian Sports Party are to:

• Promote a healthy well-balanced lifestyle.

• Educate and motivate Australians to live healthy lifestyle.

• Increase sporting participation.

• Increase childhood health with grassroots sport participation via school curriculum.

• Maximise free use of Government controlled facilities such as parks, reserves, public leisure centers and recreation programs.

• Create stronger communities.

• Support Australia's sporting culture.

That's not a policy.. Just like the motor enthusiasts party unfortunately I don't see them having much impact at all but frankly I can see sports party having more impact as obesity is a major problem as opposed to 'unfair defects' the overwhelming majority of the public are anti modified cars

Be interesting to see if abbot goes for double dissolution

Edited by alr33x

if he couldnt remove it he said he would how many times? if he doesnt it just proves to the voters that he is all talk no follow through.

i dont give his burst of popularity too long, if he takes too long to do it a decent chunk of his support will vote elsewhere as its going to be a lot of people voting liberal as they are tired of labour stabbing itself in the back all the time, if they can sort their shit out and not knife anyone in the mean time then they might pickup a couple seats.

Freo beat Geelong in Geelong

Port Adelaide beat collingwood at mcg

Richmond have up 40 odd point lead in 3rd quarter to Carlton and lost by 20

Cool thanks for the summary.

A frog came out of my toilet and my friend crossed a snake whilst leaving his cabin. Good day.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Just wanted to unearth this and post my baby with the new front ❤️😝 Took her to my wedding rehearsal today. Next up is getting wide skirts (after wedding)
    • Yea, that is what I was getting at in my ramblings too. The nismo one actually is a 1.5 way and a 1 way. They don't do a *2* way because a true *2* way would have equal ramp angles. Or is that a true 1.5 way? Realistically I think a "1.5 way" does not actually exist. A diff can either lock in two directions or one. It also doesn't help that a LOT of people in Australia speak about 1.5 way diffs are referring to their 1 way diff.
    • Well, the trouble with that ^^ is: The configuration shown is absolutely a 1-way, not a 1.5-way. There is no way that a 1.5-way can be said to offer LSD action only on acceleration. If Nismo cannot get that right, then it is impossible to believe their documentation. That ^ is not a 1.5 way setup. That is a 1-way.   And so now I have allowed all doubts to flourish and have gone back to look at the MotoIQ video. I originally made the mistake of believing him when he said "this is a 1.5-way" at the ~6:10 mark. Because what he did was take the gear assembly out of the 2-way opening and just rotate it one place to the left to drop it into the 1-way opening. When he dropped it in there, the cam was "backwards" compared to the correct orientation shown in all other photos of that config. The flat shold have been facing the 1° ramp side of the opening, not the 55° ramp side. And I thought, "gee that's cute", but I was concerned at the time, when he put the other ring back on, that the gap between the rings looked like it was wider then in the 2-way config. And then I said a lot of things in my long post on Tuesday that could only make sense if the guy from MotoIQ was correct about what he'd done. BUT... I have now done my homework. I grabbed a frame of the video with the 2-way config, and then grabbed another with the "1.5-way" config, snipped out the cam and opening of that frame and just pasted it direct on top of the 2-way config. I scaled it so that the triangular opening was almost exactly the same height in both. AND.... the gap between the plates is wider with the cam installed in the triangualr opening backwards. That is.... it cannot go together that way. There would be massive force on the plates all the time, if you could even reassemble it.  So, My statement on the matter? The Nismo diff is actually only a 2-way and 1-way. There is no 1.5-way option in it, regardless of what they say. Here's a photo of a real 1.5-way ramp opening from Cusco (along with the 1 way option). And the full set of 1 through 2 way options from their racing diff, which is not same-same as what we'd typically be using, but...the cams work the same. A little blurry, but it comes from this Cusco doc, which is quite helpful. AND.... Cusco do in fact do what I suggested would be sensible, which is to have rings that do 1 and 1.5, and 1.5 and 2. Separately.  
    • Welcome Adam. Car looks great!
    • "With a 1.5-WAY, the LSD is effective only during acceleration."
×
×
  • Create New...