Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

To be honest, I never really used flex fuel.

Seems good, in the real world once you're on E85 you don't need 98, as the availability is fine unless you're driving to Mildura etc.

That said, flex isn't very hard. All the ECU needs to know is ethanol % which it turns from 0V to 5V.

Then the ECU takes that input which may be like 2.5V, and applies a certain percentage of a correction map to fuel/timing/boost, relative to the voltage of that input.

That's all there is to it

  • Like 1

To be honest, I never really used flex fuel.

Seems good, in the real world once you're on E85 you don't need 98, as the availability is fine unless you're driving to Mildura etc.

That said, flex isn't very hard. All the ECU needs to know is ethanol % which it turns from 0V to 5V.

Then the ECU takes that input which may be like 2.5V, and applies a certain percentage of a correction map to fuel/timing/boost, relative to the voltage of that input.

That's all there is to it

i regularly drive to brissie.

Then I suggest you get a wideband and flex fuel

Wideband because playing with correction maps is likely going to be needed if you want it perfect. Its quite time intensive and expecting it to be PERFECT from a few hours on a dyno will never be feasible.

There's a lot of "hm, I'm idling at 13.7 AFR when I'd like it to be 14.7 when I am on 72% 98 and 28% E85" goings on

then again, can i justify paying 3k or so to make car flex fuel capable? 800$ for injectors, nistune, 1k +-, sensors and stuff, 1k, scotty intake 300?

i'll still run stock turbo.

Running E85 on stock turbo is really not a cost effective/convienient solution

Technically speaking, all E85 does is removes limitations of less than optimal systems, its not like you're gonna slam 30PSI into a stock turbo with a ton of timing for other explodey reasons...

If you could hit MBT and Peak compressor efficiency from your turbo on 98 without it pinging to death, switching to E85 wouldn't give you more power, I've been told that's why some people see big gains from E85 and some people don't

There's still gains to be made from advancing the timing and taking advantage of 107 octane.

Boost will also come on sooner.

But I think if you're spending that much on upgrades you should at the least get an $800 high flow and get another 60-70rwkw out of it while you're there, sacrifice a bit of response given the factory turbo is responsive and linear enough let alone with E85.

Technically speaking though, advancing timing only increases power to a point, after a point it starts reducing power.

If you're not pinging at that point, on 98 well, you don't need E85. It's possible in some lovely systems to not be pinging at MBT.

Same thing re: Boost pressure.

But in the real world, where we do stuff like add turbos to systems designed for lesser turbos, well, E85 starts becoming cool.

Would be curious to see what happens on a stock system, but you aren't gonna run more than 10psi on it anyway.

I would wager youd gain more powars per dollar by upgrading to a hiflow on 98, vs converting to E85 on a stock turbo.

Running E85 on stock turbo is really not a cost effective/convienient solution

Technically speaking, all E85 does is removes limitations of less than optimal systems, its not like you're gonna slam 30PSI into a stock turbo with a ton of timing for other explodey reasons...

If you could hit MBT and Peak compressor efficiency from your turbo on 98 without it pinging to death, switching to E85 wouldn't give you more power, I've been told that's why some people see big gains from E85 and some people don't

There's still gains to be made from advancing the timing and taking advantage of 107 octane.

Boost will also come on sooner.

But I think if you're spending that much on upgrades you should at the least get an $800 high flow and get another 60-70rwkw out of it while you're there, sacrifice a bit of response given the factory turbo is responsive and linear enough let alone with E85.

so. 4k? LOL.

I'm planning on moving to the country, so there will be winton days on 98 and any tracks in city E85

saves me having to do a run down to MELB with jerry cans to do a tampered day.

Planning on going north?

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yep, the closest base tune available was for the GTT, I went with that and made all the logical changes I could find to convert it to Naturally Aspirated. It will rev fine in Neutral to redline but it will be cutting nearly 50% fuel the whole way.  If I let it tune the fuel map to start with that much less fuel it wont run right and has a hard time applying corrections.  These 50% cuts are with a fuel map already about half of what the GTT tune had.  I was having a whole lot of bogging when applying any throttle but seem to have fixed that for no load situations with very aggressive transient throttle settings. I made the corrections to my injectors with data I found for them online, FBCJC100 flowing 306cc.  I'll have to look to see if I can find the Cam section. I have the Bosch 4.9 from Haltech. My manifold pressure when watching it live is always in -5.9 psi/inHg
    • Hi My Tokico BM50 Brake master cylinder has a leak from the hole between the two outlets (M10x1) for brake pipes, I have attached a photo. Can anyone tell me what that hole is and what has failed to allow brake fluid to escape from it, I have looked on line and asked questions on UK forums but can not find the answer, if anyone can enlighten me I would be most grateful.
    • It will be a software setting. I don't believe many on here ever used AEM. And they're now a discontinued product,that's really hard to find any easy answers on. If it were Link or Haltech, someone would be able to just send you a ECU file though.
    • Yes sir am asking is there possible way from aem tuner from wiring pins 
    • Have you checked cam to crank timing and confirmed balancer marks are correct?
×
×
  • Create New...