Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

*ahem* engineer whose specialisation is statistics checking in & you reference the lawyer

Lawyers are wordsmiths like myself and Hamish is Hamish; my apologies.

Please accept one student copy of SPSS as a goodwill offering.

B.Soc.Sc major in T tests

I was surprised when they changed the rules regarding to teachers from needing a diploma to a degree. Suddenly it's a much bigger commitment and time to become a teacher. Do you think it will increase the quality of teachers due to this?

Hmmm that one can sometimes take the input shaft with it, hopefully not yet and it's just on it's way out.

Outside chance, but can also be a clutch issue. Thrust bearing another slight possibility if it's rattling around on the input shaft retainer because it's slightly touching the pressure plate (a good way to test out this one is to put a small amount of pressure on the clutch pedal so that it presses the bearing firmly up against clutch, but doesn't engage the clutch...if noise disappears then it's probably this. Otherwise input shaft / spigot bearing is your culprit.

Might as well do rear main while you're there too.

Thrust bearing sounds very logical as I'm pretty sure the noise went away as I touched the clutch peddle.

Rear main was done with the new engine so should be good.

Thrust bearing sounds very logical as I'm pretty sure the noise went away as I touched the clutch peddle.

Rear main was done with the new engine so should be good.

That's good news hopefully then

Just a semi box out job and hopefully it was just noisy and hasn't chewed away at the input shaft retainer, not that these are particularly expensive

  • Like 1

I was surprised when they changed the rules regarding to teachers from needing a diploma to a degree. Suddenly it's a much bigger commitment and time to become a teacher. Do you think it will increase the quality of teachers due to this?

no

I was surprised when they changed the rules regarding to teachers from needing a diploma to a degree. Suddenly it's a much bigger commitment and time to become a teacher. Do you think it will increase the quality of teachers due to this?

Yep

Can't guarantee that, but can guarantee there are heaps of lazy, uncommitted teachers who got through on a diploma and want a quick career in something they aren't particularly passionate about. Leesh has mentored quite a few teachers doing their student prac with her and it's always the diploma students who are the worst.

May mean a potential shortage in future, but yes I'd expect the quality to improve. Really no different logic from making med students do 6+ years of uni.

  • Like 1
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...