Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Anyone else experiencing problems with this site or is my computer bugged?

1. it often does not display properly - just a narrow band on the middle of the page.

2. Mostly I cannot access my messages unless some PMs me in which case i can reply

3. Sometimes I cannot reply to posts

4 Often I cannot edit my own posts

A different issue which has been going on for some time is that when I try to close links which have been posted the website cloess instead of the link.

Anyone else had any of these problems??

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/384869-problems-with-this-site/
Share on other sites

I have Mac and run firefox and for the last 5 days having problems as above e.g displays as narrow band.

I logged out and took me forever to log back in and had to do it via crapbook.

I cant edit or even display my settings.

I've tried in safari,Firefox and Google Chrome and same problem in all browsers.

:wacko:

Thanks mate - I'm not going mad!

Loaded latest update for Windows 7 (which displays all other sites with no problems) and then down loaded Safari - which is even worse - can't even log in!

Will try to make a note in the admin section.

OK I can't even open a thread in the Site Maintainence/bugs section.

Could someone who has no problems kindly paste a link to this thread in that section?

Thanks

Bob

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/384869-problems-with-this-site/page__gopid__6139284#entry6139284

Now that the Mac fanboys have quietened down...

I have no problems with Win7 and Firefox, Mac and Firefox or Chrome, Ubuntu and Chromium, iPad and Safari, or Android and Chrome. Win7 and MacOS are so close these days there's really bugger all difference.

Get rid of Internet Explorer and that should help.

I've always used win xp, firefox and had no issues, same with ie.

In IE try going to the tools menu and turning compatibility view on/off and perhaps clear history/temp internet files,

then reload the page and see how you go.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The values for HID colour are also defined ~ see https://www.legislation.gov.au/F2006L02732/latest/text  ~ goto section 3.9 onwards ....
    • So, if the headlights' cutoff behaviour (angles, heights, etc) are not as per 6.2.6.1.1 without automatic levelling, then you have to have to have automatic** levelling. Also, if the headlight does not have the required markings, then neither automatic nor manual adjusters are going to be acceptable. That's because the base headlight itself does not meet the minimum requirement (which is the marking). ** with the option of manual levelling, if the headlight otherwise meets the same requirements as for the automatic case AND can be set to the "base" alignment at the headlight itself. So that's an additional requirement for the manual case. So, provided that the marking is on the headlight and there is a local manual adjustment back to "base" on the headlight, then yes, you could argue that they are code compliant. But if you are missing any single one of these things, then they are not. And unlike certain other standards that I work with, there does not seem to be scope to prepare a "fitness for purpose" report. Well, I guess there actually is. You might engage an automotive engineer to write a report stating that the lights meet the performance requirements of the standard even if they are missing, for example, the markings.  
    • Vertical orientation   6.2.6.1.1. The initial downward inclination of the cut off of the dipped-beam to be set in the unladen vehicle state with one person in the driver's seat shall be specified within an accuracy of 0.1 per cent by the manufacturer and indicated in a clearly legible and indelible manner on each vehicle close to either headlamp or the manufacturer's plate by the symbol shown in Annex 7.   The value of this indicated downward inclination shall be defined in accordance with paragraph 6.2.6.1.2.   6.2.6.1.2. Depending on the mounting height in metres (h) of the lower edge of the apparent surface in the direction of the reference axis of the dipped beam headlamp, measured on the unladen vehicles, the vertical inclination of the cut off of the dipped- beam shall, under all the static conditions of Annex 5, remain between the following limits and the initial aiming shall have the following values:   h < 0.8   Limits: between 0.5 per cent and 2.5 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.0 per cent and 1.5 per cent   0.8 < h < 1.0   Limits: between 0.5 per cent and 2.5 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.0 per cent and 1.5 per cent   Or, at the discretion of the manufacturer,   Limits: between 1.0 per cent and 3.0 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.5 per cent and 2.0 per cent   The application for the vehicle type approval shall, in this case, contain information as to which of the two alternatives is to be used.   h > 1.0   Limits: between 1.0 per cent and 3.0 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.5 per cent and 2.0 per cent   The above limits and the initial aiming values are summarized in the diagram below.   For category N3G (off-road) vehicles where the headlamps exceed a height of 1,200 mm, the limits for the vertical inclination of the cut-off shall be between: -1.5 per cent and -3.5 per cent.   The initial aim shall be set between: -2 per cent and -2.5 per cent.
×
×
  • Create New...