Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Also.... March 18th Superlap Australia FB post

In 2010 the Cyber Evo was actually retired from racing..... yet it came to WTAC and took home the trophy........ In 2011 the Cyber Evo was "now officially retired" yet... guess what.... It came back to WTAC and took the victory again..... In 2012.....lets just say, we will "NEVER SAY NEVER"

  • Replies 742
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Whispering Jack hard!!!

Cyber GTR was suppose to get a full pamper treatment with its engine management. Unfortunately tilton has held them up with a gearbox. So no goer

My car is supposed to get tuned next month but my tuner is not available between 13th to 23rd ..... why? because ill be

in Japan replacing the Power FC and putting a full system in the Cyber EVO instead........ okkkkaaayyy .... coming to WTAC 2012 wooooot woooooot!!!!

:cheers:

Interesting indeed given the GTR wasn't meant to be ready until 2013 :thumbsup:

This will be interesting indeed to see if they come back "again" lol.

Interesting indeed given the GTR wasn't meant to be ready until 2013 :thumbsup:

This will be interesting indeed to see if they come back "again" lol.

Yes this is correct! but given the fact that Haltech had already planned this trip, it would of been a real waste to cancel

everything.... hence the "COMEBACK" lol

obivously Superlap Australia have done a superb job in presenting a enticing package to make this happen :P

kind of spoils all the fun though that we know now, although it will allow other people to now bench mark improvements in performance against them at an event that will be certain to be very entertaining.

How long you reckon it will take to sell out places this year in open? 3hours last year so maybe 30min this year?

You would have to think there will be a Que at High Octane @ 6am in the morning like a line up for a Justin Beber concert.

kind of spoils all the fun though that we know now, although it will allow other people to now bench mark improvements in performance against them at an event that will be certain to be very entertaining.

How long you reckon it will take to sell out places this year in open? 3hours last year so maybe 30min this year?

You would have to think there will be a Que at High Octane @ 6am in the morning like a line up for a Justin Beber concert.

I have heard it’s ready full. Entry forms have been sent out to people they would like compete not just the top ten from last year..... hope it’s not true.

That is the point of Pro class.

Superlap have also sent out forms to the top x drivers from last year, all of that information is public and fair I think. If you placed well last year you should have the opportunity to re-enter easily.

yes it appears teh cyber Evo rumours are becoming stronger for a return in 2012

Eric Hsu usually knows whats going on.

http://www.motoiq.com/magazine_articles/id/2452/underneath-the-skin-of-the-legendary-cyberevo.aspx

yes it appears teh cyber Evo rumours are becoming stronger for a return in 2012

Eric Hsu usually knows whats going on.

http://www.motoiq.co...y-cyberevo.aspx

I was just looking at this a couple of hours ago, a great read and especially as they mention the return of Cyber and some guy named Taniguchi :) driving the Top Fuel S2000 with a rumours of 750hp and big aero. Very interesting!

That is the point of Pro class.

Superlap have also sent out forms to the top x drivers from last year, all of that information is public and fair I think. If you placed well last year you should have the opportunity to re-enter easily.

Yeah agreed.

Or you get in contact with Ian & express your interest, details about the car etc and get entry that way.

I'd think that'd be possible for those that haven't come out before, but would draw a big crowd type thing

Yeah agreed.

Or you get in contact with Ian & express your interest, details about the car etc and get entry that way.

I'd think that'd be possible for those that haven't come out before, but would draw a big crowd type thing

promoter reserves the right to reject their entry

Makes perfect sense, you want the field to be nice a close in times and battling it out. Or at least looking good and maybe catching on fire for good measure...(2011 some so 'n so with a R35, lol)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...