Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Yeah I understand that

I will be running 50/50 with the tune.

Everyone can drive off boost so even of I run out its not the end of the world you can still drive around off boost right? Just not thrash it

If you did that you would have to be extremely careful not to ever come onto boost if you had really ramped up the boost / timing with the WM mixture injecting. Otherwise good bye motor very very quickly! I wouldn't feel comfortable driving it around like that for any period of time!

Just get a float sensor for the tank and a warning light, and carry some extra WM with you. Or invest in a failsafe device.

I recently bought the AEM failsafe device which looks very good. I will use it to trigger a second map in the ECU.

Hes got a float sensor/warning light already yeah.

I would aim to have it tuned with 2 stages of boost, where the low boost is perfectly fine without the WMI and the high boost is WMI dependant.

Best of both worlds :thumbsup:

Maybe get a fail safe and wire it up so that it will kill the power/remove the ground to your boost controller when it's triggered. That way if you run out it'll just run off gate pressure which is better than nothing...

Pretty sure snow make a safe injection/fail safe type thing, but most brands will probably work with your kit.

Edited by Mitcho_7
  • 1 month later...

Im going to try install a air/water atomiser inbetween the turbo and airflow meter and see if it works. Get rid of the pump

system. Don't know anyone thats tried it so will be suck and see, to see if the air upsets anything...

cheers

darren

Compressor wheel erosion will occur.

Errr, i know you know a lot...but your wrong this time, very wrong ..done it heaps of times...only air sprays wear out wheels..air/atomisers do not

the air side of breaks the water down into much more fine microns than shitty arse chinese bilge pump setup...lol. My coolingmist

kit even with there new fange dangled super atomiser is no where near as fine as my air/water atomiser....

I have done this, more than once... so i speak from experience, i didn't read about it on the net inbetween masturbating

on redtube..lmao

cheers

darren

Edited by jet_r31

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah i found that alot of parts can be wrong or "very" hard to get the real right one. I already bought some brakes years ago on me "old" GT calipers and they were wrong too 😄  I told them too. Even send them pictures...but they said "EBC catalogue has them on my car... So i dont know what their answer will be. I call monday them and let them know that they are really not on my car. If they were they would be already on a car...
    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
×
×
  • Create New...