Jump to content
SAU Community

Piglet's Rebuild Of His Busted Tomei 2.8


Recommended Posts

Area under the curve is more important than top end power IMO, your car will be mental. That's why i designed my car the way i did. 

Even at my relative power level i find for street work, it's getting to the point the extra power is useless. 

I'm loving my current tune on 98, i can't wait to see it on E85 again. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Piggaz said:

I believe Scott is spending all day on it today. No idea where it's all upto apart from the information I've posted.

Cant see it making anymore than 480 awkw. That's as much as Scott has seen out of a 8374.

how hard are you planning on pushing it - boost wise? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, usmair said:

how hard are you planning on pushing it - boost wise? 

Whatever 125,000 Rpm is. It will be higher early on then taper off as the engine consumes more air. 

So. Bring on 125 k ASAP and leave it there. Boost, who cares but at guesstimate, 30 ish psi as it comes on (late 3000's/4000 ish) and mid 20's at 8000 rpm. With any luck, hopefully less "boost".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Piggaz said:

Whatever 125,000 Rpm is. It will be higher early on then taper off as the engine consumes more air. 

So. Bring on 125 k ASAP and leave it there. Boost, who cares but at guesstimate, 30 ish psi as it comes on (late 3000's/4000 ish) and mid 20's at 8000 rpm. With any luck, hopefully less "boost".

interesting. looking forward to it.

Just for fun rather than anything else - i compared my power in the midrange compared to yours - i'm at ~100kw at 3700 - you've got ~270kw - same turbo lol

I need me a stroker kit

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, usmair said:

interesting. looking forward to it.

Just for fun rather than anything else - i compared my power in the midrange compared to yours - i'm at ~100kw at 3700 - you've got ~270kw - same turbo lol

I need me a stroker kit

just get V-Cam OR Nitrous. OR both?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Update time!!!!

Fuel is E56 only

Still not bringing it on as hard as possible, just letting it come up as normal (not tuning via turbine speed YET). 

Turbo is a EFR 8374/1.05 AR turbine housing.

300 KW at 4000 ish, 461.5 KW at 6000 RPM then it falls over. I didn't see this coming but the issue is the turbine housing is too small! The next size up is a 1.45 AR which is the same housings they used on the indy cars. They were saying that the head is  just breathing like a weapon. Funnily enough, both Petes and Intune's car were able to stretch to 8000 RPM even though their engines are larger!

For the time being I will take it back and enjoy it for a while. If I put the 1.45 on, Scott thinks it will see 500 KW and make even more through the middle by 20-30 KW. However, i'll lose a tad at 3000 ish RPM.

I suppose I better get used to short shifting. Lucky I have 6 gears. 

For those of you who are hooked up on boost numbers, 25 psi at 3850 ish RPM but that will improve again. Pretty sporty for a lazy, laggy single turbo :1_grinning:

 

 

 

  • Like 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Piggaz said:

Update time!!!!

Fuel is E56 only

Still not bringing it on as hard as possible, just letting it come up as normal (not tuning via turbine speed YET). 

Turbo is a EFR 8374/1.05 AR turbine housing.

300 KW at 4000 ish, 461.5 KW at 6000 RPM then it falls over. I didn't see this coming but the issue is the turbine housing is too small! The next size up is a 1.45 AR which is the same housings they used on the indy cars. They were saying that the head is  just breathing like a weapon. Funnily enough, both Petes and Intune's car were able to stretch to 8000 RPM even though their engines are larger!

For the time being I will take it back and enjoy it for a while. If I put the 1.45 on, Scott thinks it will see 500 KW and make even more through the middle by 20-30 KW. However, i'll lose a tad at 3000 ish RPM.

I suppose I better get used to short shifting. Lucky I have 6 gears. 

For those of you who are hooked up on boost numbers, 25 psi at 3850 ish RPM but that will improve again. Pretty sporty for a lazy, laggy single turbo :1_grinning:

 

 

 

The tad you loose at 3000, can I have it please :wub:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Piggaz said:

Go put a 6258 on your car.

I built mine so I could have a strong top end . I want to keep it and as tried to get it as good as I could down low . 

I don't want to loose anything from the top end, I still can rev it to 8000 if I want .  Just like it a bit different than most I guess :/ 

That head you had done is something else , cannot wait to see it all working together, what a machine :wub:

I just found a pic of you image.jpeg.b25b27a9dbf556a841d944083f03f787.jpeg

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Congrats Paul, now enjoy it for awhile and mull on can of worms thats just been opened but was hiding there in front of you.

What brake set up are you running ? Reason I ask you may find that other things may need upgrade first, like stopping ,fine tune the nadling (think you sorted that but f**k me too much alcohol brain damage cant remember shit) then sort last power upgrade, all just subtle stuff. Then you'll have the ultimate skyline weapon.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, elrodeo666 said:

Congrats Paul, now enjoy it for awhile and mull on can of worms thats just been opened but was hiding there in front of you.

What brake set up are you running ? Reason I ask you may find that other things may need upgrade first, like stopping ,fine tune the nadling (think you sorted that but f**k me too much alcohol brain damage cant remember shit) then sort last power upgrade, all just subtle stuff. Then you'll have the ultimate skyline weapon.

 

Brakes are sorted, mate. 365 mm 6 pot fronts/350 mm 4 pot rear alcons. Need to change the front pads, the ones in there are woody nuggets!

Suspension and arms are all sorted, although it needs a wheel alignment. The whole rear end has been out to replace the sub frame bushes.

Cant believe I'm out of rear housing. Quite strange that the 3.2 and 3.0 can go to 8000 rpm but the little 2.8 cant. I suppose those polished ports ain't so bad after all ;).

I have in my head the 1.45 isn't a straight bolt on. The housing absolutely MASSIVE!!!! Adrian (bloke from Insight) said if they made a 1.6 you'd put it on haha.

Data is showing 46 Psi in the exhaust manifold. 

Im heading out tomorrow to sit down with Scott. Grab as much data as I can.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Opened up the cluster to inspect the gauge itself for signs of damage and it looks good. Got curious since that needle doesn't go back to a "neutral" position by itself (it stays in the same position when ignition is off. so I manually moved it to 1/2. Connected it back, turned on the ignition and the needle started moving up! Not sure what's up with that but before that the needle was way down below empty like fully south west. There's always a chance that the needle moved slightly the first time I tried and I didn't notice because of how slowly it moves and how far it was from the markings. I don't know if the current needle position is accurate so I'll fill it up and see where that brings it. I guess I'll try to adjust it manually if it doesn't get to F. Looks like the needle position is relative and not absolute? Thanks all for your help and patience!
    • You're confusing two different responders and more than one issue. The stock Neo ECU boost sensor is used by the ECU for protection purposes. It is essentially only an overboost sensor. It is not used for determining engine load for fuelling or ignition purposes. That task falls solely to the AFM. Any aftermarket ECU that either has an onboard MAP sensor or a plug in one, will use the MAP sensor as the primary load sensor. Or I should perhaps say "can", rather than "will", because some of them have the option of using other primary load sensors. That MAP sensor is not for the same function as the stock Neo boost sensor. The reason I recommended against a plug and play ECU is that they are intended to run a particular engine and usually in the car that the particular engine came in. So, if you have a transplanted engine in a different car, with some parts of the original missing (such as the boost sensor, for example) and therefore likely non-standardness of the loom and its insertion into the car's loom, then it is very likely that you will run into the same problems with needing to fix up wiring to make it work that you would with the stock ECU. And, if doing so for the stock ECU is enough of an obstacle that you start considering a standalone plugin as a solution, it should become clear that the plugin is quite possibly not the solution you'd hope it to be. It would just lead to more of the same type of problem solving work to get it going. In the above paragraph and in my earlier post, the lack of the boost sensor is not critical. It was just used as an example of something that we knew you did not have right, such that the stock ECU would not work. I took that as an indicator of a reasonable probability that there were other related problems hiding there.
    • I can think of two places in my city of <1.5million population that specialise in automotive instrument repairs.Unless you're out in the wilds of Quebec, you have 3 major Canadian and 3 major US cities within the same distance as the single nearest city to mine. Surely there is somewhere you could send it.
    • I never cared for twins but whenever these conversations came up, I always presumed the higher number represented a larger turbo. Learn something new everyday. 
    • Interesting, I've never seen a failure like that before but with the age of these cars and the general questionable-ness of all kinds of parts these days you can't rule anything out I suppose. Boost leak testing the boost control system would've revealed this though.
×
×
  • Create New...