Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 82
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Ok so theoretically say we have two engines of the same spec apart from compression.

One is 10.5:1 comp and the other is 8.5:1 comp. If the 10.5:1 motor is on 7psi, would it make the same power as the 8.5:1 motor on the same boost?? Sorry i'm a n00b.

no, you would expect the higher compression motor to make more power for the same boost and start making its boost earlier, however if you are running the turbo out of flow then you may end up with similar peak power figures given everything else in the engines are equal.

How about an RB25 or 26 Block, 26 crank, 25/26 conrods but use NEO pistons to bump up the CR. The extra 2mm of stroke will bump up the compression ratio (you'd need to use a calculator to work out the final compression ratio). But a NEO is 9.0:1 factory so you'd gain a reasonable amount from that stroke.

It may go too far though and cause the piston to stick too far out of the deck. Possibly hitting the quench pads. You definitely wouldn't want a heavily shaved head or block.

Just an idea, it might be easy to get it to work, or it might be nearly impossible.

How about an RB25 or 26 Block, 26 crank, 25/26 conrods but use NEO pistons to bump up the CR. The extra 2mm of stroke will bump up the compression ratio (you'd need to use a calculator to work out the final compression ratio). But a NEO is 9.0:1 factory so you'd gain a reasonable amount from that stroke.

It may go too far though and cause the piston to stick too far out of the deck. Possibly hitting the quench pads. You definitely wouldn't want a heavily shaved head or block.

Just an idea, it might be easy to get it to work, or it might be nearly impossible.

the rb25 pistons are all the same, the neo head has a smaller combustion area which is what gives it the higher cr, the 26 pistons have a different comp/pin hieght to account for the extra stroke, but you still have to work out the static comp ratio when chopping and changeing crank/rod/piston setups.

as long as you keep a 0 deck hieght and have a 1mm+ head gasket you wont have piston/head clearance problems, piston/valve comes down to cam duration and timing more then anything, if its to close for comfort then you can get/have the pistons flycut for valve clearance

to get the cr up you have to reduce combustion area, where it be by shaving the head or getting pistons with bigger domes the end result is the same.

lifting comp ratios has the same effect on turbos as N/As, the higher the cr the high the PSI in the combustion camber at TDC, the higher the pressure the more force on the piston pushing it down and in turn giving more power.

adding boost means your compressing pressurized air( boost pressure ) inturn increasing combustion pressures which gives more power

Wrong. 9.0:1

I think the misconception here comes from the fact that the commonly used "off the shelf" pistons that CP sells for the RB25DET (which are not suitable for use in Neo's) are 8.5:1 rather the the OEM 9:1.

When you buy CP pistons for a Neo they are a custom non stocked item and they simply copy the exact Neo OEM piston, so the standard offering is still 9:1 unless you want further customization.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Jack the back of the car up, pull that wheel off, pull that sensor out, and put a bore scope into the hole to inspect the outer casing, see if anything looks damaged before you pull the whole thing apart.
    • Ergh... So I pulled the speed sensor out again and the tip was shiny so I think it's rubbing the bearing. The bearing contains the magnets for the speed sensor so I think when the first sensor broke it damaged the magnet ring on the bearing.  This is just a Google image, but there is a hole going to the bearing. So when the tip broke off the old sensor I'm guessing it fouled the bearing... As the magnet is only protected by a plastic cover it would be easy to damage it. So I guess I'm doing a bearing again.   
    • My thinking is that if the O2 sensor is shot then your entire above described experience is pure placebo.
    • Here is the mess that I made. That filler there was successful in filling dents in that area. But in the middle area. I can feel dents. And I've gone ocer it multiple times with filler. And the filler is no longer there because i accidently sanded it away. I've chased my tail on this job but this is something else lol. So I'm gonna attempt filler one more time and if it doesn't work I'll just high fill primer the door and see where the issues are because guidecoat is of no use atm.
    • Ok, so I think I sort of figured out where I went wrong. So I definitely overthinked it, and I over sanded, which is probably a large part of the problem. to fix it, I ended up tapping some spots that were likely to be high, made them low, filled them in, and I tackled small sections at a time, and it feels a lot better.    I think what confused me as well is you have the bare metal, and some spots darker and some are lighter, and when I run my finger across it, it' would feel like it's a low spot, but I think it's just a transition in different texture from metal to body filler.    When your finger's sliding on the body filler, and crosses over to the bare metal, going back and forth, it feels like it's a low spot. So I kept putting filler there and sanding, but I think it was just a transition in texture, nothing to do with the low or high spot. But the panel's feels a lot better, and I'm just going to end up priming it, and then I'll block it after with guide coat.   Ended up wasting just about all of my filler on this damn door lol  
×
×
  • Create New...