Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

It's pretty much the same as low mounting a GT3582R - everything is pretty much the same as a GT3076R but the compressor housing is larger .70a/r T04S housing instead of .60a/r T04E one - slightly larger outlet

So it will definitely need the intake pipe, spacer plate and probably 2.5 inch intercooler piping and almost certainly another custom dump? And oil and water lines maybe? Is $1200 a decent price for all those? That doesn't include installation obviously

Pretty steep.

I'd want to be paying 200 for lines, 200 for an intake and not more than 500 for the dump and spacer plate. I would also expect these prices to accommodate install whilst on the job.

Those are very 'rounded' numbers, too.

An intake pipe on a skyline with a pod is very simple to make, and unless you want breathers and stuff added then you don't even need to have one made. A simple 90 degree bend with a pod on the end of it can be had. You can also source your line kit from Kando dynamic on eBay for less than I quoted.

Where are you located?

I'm trying to avoid pods as much as possible. I'm trying to keep the standard air box. I'm going for a stealthy as possible look. I've even hacked up the heat shield over the exhaust to make room for the custom 3' dump so if possible I'd like to keep air box heat shield etc. obviously of this is impossible I can do without.

I'm in Sydney; specifically bankstown. Know any good places that can do things like intake pipes etc. ATM I go to pulse racing at Menai for anything I can't do myself and they have been pretty good so far

It's pretty much the same as low mounting a GT3582R - everything is pretty much the same as a GT3076R but the compressor housing is larger .70a/r T04S housing instead of .60a/r T04E one - slightly larger outlet

Not sure if people think it's OT but that T04S compressor housing is a bulky cow of a think and I still have to wonder if it makes that much difference over a T04E one . If you look through the range of FP HTA GT30/35 based turbos most / all have that T04S housing and it makes them look BIG . Correct me if I'm wrong but from 71 to 86mm HTA compressors must have significantly different air flow rates yet all use a modified S housing . Garrett doesn't seem to have problems using the more compact E housing with it's 2" outlet and they seem to get good power out of it . Perhaps the Ford XR6 GT3582R version is good to look at considering it has an even smaller A/R (0.50 vs 0.60) version of the T04E compressor housing and it copes sort of OK for a 4 litre engine .

Lith you may think I'm splitting hairs but I've read quite a few threads where people build up their Skylines and end up going to an aftermarket exhaust manifold and hang something off it with a biggish comp housing ie 3582R or similar outline thing . The applicable plumbing in/out is huge and quite obvious compared to OE RB25DET , they get pulled over for a lid lift and it's game over - take it back to standard inc emissions test . The average Joe is never going to take it back to standard and another Skyline bites the dust .

Lith we both know a 3076R doesn't look standard either but I reckon it looks a bit less lethal and is a bit easier to fit - purely because of it's compressor housing .

People like me want to keep the standard exhaust manifold and air box and we run the return flow intercoolers with 2 inch pipes to keep things looking mostly standard .

Obviously FP aren't stupid and they use these HTA wheels in Mitsy or similar housings on Evo turbos - direct fit ones in Evo 9s .

The last thing I want is a bulky turbo because it's so obvious , I am interested in 71 and 76 HTAs but not with that compressor housing . It's the only thing that lets them down IMO .

A .

When you make out like the T04S monsters the T04E compressor housing, I can't help but think of this turbo line up - features a Garrett GT40R, GT37R, GT35R, GT30R and a Borg Warner S200SX and S300SX to put everything into perspective:

allturbos.jpg

lol the T04S is only a tiny bit larger than the T04E, the outlet size is the biggest change.

Exactly..disco is tripping ballsacks, ive measured them up, theres fark all in it, T04S housings looked big in the 90's..lol

An hour (if that) and some ACL heatshield..and you'll never see see a 3540 comp cover on a standard manifold at all, no matter how hard you look....im pretty sure i posted a photo, just for you in another thread.

its not hard....and you can fit your return flow no worries aswell

cheers

darren

Edited by jet_r31
  • Like 1
  • 3 weeks later...

Silly me - updated the wrong thread, I was meant to post this here :wacko:

A Supra owner in the US has upgraded from their old Borg Warner S467 T4 turbo to a T3 flanged FP Super99HTZ and picked up 15% more power with a huge increase in spool - they run a Powerglide and usually use a transbrake however they are testing for an event this weekend where the class they will be in doesn't allow transbrakes, so they did testing using a foot brake starting at low boost to see how much they could hold back with the foot brake and have already laid down a 8.97 @ 151mph... I suspect when they get to a meet they can use the transbrake and wind up the boost a few eyebrows will be raised - not that running 8s on a T3 based turbo with a Supra isn't pretty unreal as it is!
Here's a dyno vid (unfortunately they only uploaded to FB): https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=194348620749465&set=vb.173984302785897&type=2&theater
Dyno numbers will be a bit messed up due to the loose Powerglide - but a Supra running 8s at >150mph is going to be making north of 900hp to start with, it isn't running NOS and it did it off the foot brake with more boost in it.... so safe to say that it's already a pretty stout result :)

It's pretty much the same as low mounting a GT3582R - everything is pretty much the same as a GT3076R but the compressor housing is larger .70a/r T04S housing instead of .60a/r T04E one - slightly larger outlet

Dat HTA3076 :wub:

f4094b3d-d8d3-4612-8c5d-4526a04234f9_zps

  • Like 1

Still a bit dark about travelling >2000km to Australia to meet some of your clowns and after spending weeks helping deciding on a turbo I never got to hear cam noise or see this thing in the flesh :P

  • 3 weeks later...

Here's a clip of that Supra with the Super99 HTZ doing an 8.95 @ 152mph off the foot brake with a Powerglide (no trans brake use allowed in the street class it was racing in).

It has since done an 8.75 using the transbrake at an event the following weekend - trap speeds aren't much higher, but it is out of gear in the top end so needs a higher final drive to knock the trap speeds up now. Probably worth mentioning the car races on radials too, apparently.

I remember being told a Supra would never go sub 9s with a T3 turbo - I guess they may have been right, this Supra pretty much skipped the 9s and went straight into the 8s ;)

  • 3 weeks later...

In regards to anyone running the FP HTA 3076 on the standard manifold, what kind of wastegate setup would prove to be the hot option? Wastegate pipe welded onto standard manifold or welding a wastegate setup directly onto the turbine housing. Very curious.

Thanks in advance.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...