Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

lolz.....funny topic.

I have only had one issue with a Precision Turbo's from John. I actually charge more to install a Hypergear turbo's due to poor clocking, Banjo fittings being different and the thing being supplied like it was just found in a junk yard.....I also offer NO reduction in costs if the turbo is stuffed within bugger all KM's due to poor oil flow on idle. It's funny how I have no issues with John discussing and getting the right setup. I too have had issues with Hypergear in the past supplying the wrong banjo's (would have been OK for a local job but this job was 300km's away), clocking, resend back to them at my cost due to wastegate problems, long turn arounds and communication.

Precision do 3 types of turbo's:

  • SS1 - $1,250
  • SS2 - $1,250
  • GT30/71r BB internals(the same Turbo Fishing Freak ran 12.2's with in RWD only) - $1,650

IMO the best setup for everyday use was the one I recently put in for Alex(Scott's old one) but that is pricey. If I was to do it all again I would still got with the GT30/71r BB even though the pricing is a little high.....imo its the best of all worlds.

anyway....thats my 2c's worth.

Edited by Jetwreck

Does the 3071 bb go in the oem housings or native with an adaptor?

Goes in the original housings. You do need to modify the outlet to the intercooler though as it will need to be 18-20mm longer. If you are doing a custom intake you will need to take the movement into account as well. It's all pretty easy work.

PS. Motorsport connections has the oil feed lines in stock for either a bush or BB setup. Under the name GARDEED....there about $200. They have an inline filter as well.

actually....if you go BB let me know....I have 2 brand new lines...I'll give you a discount....you will just need to order an inline filter.

Edited by Jetwreck

I'm not overly keen on going with the OEM housings again. I'm am positive the BB 3071 would be much better but still a compromise to a degree.

My boost response with the SS2 Hypergear rev4 is as follows:

1st 2nd 3rd

2000 -.2

3000 1.6 3.7 5.4

4000 5.3 6.8 11

4700 9.7 10.3 19.5

5000 10.3 13.8 19.8

6000 13.7 14.2 19.8

As you can see to get any decent power you have to be travelling at impractible speeds. The stock turbo would be faster in 1st and probably 2nd as well. Average power(low down torque) and transient response are incredibly important to our heavy auto's.

The only turbo that I know will retain these characteristics is the titanium turbined Borg Warner EFR. Either 6258 or 6578 would be my pick.

I'm using one of Johns Precision Turbochargers SS2 profile; recommended by Craig over 3 years ago.

I cannot speak highly enough of John, and the quality of his workmanship. He invited me to his workshop, and was more than happy to explain the theory behind what he builds, and it performed exactly as he said it would.

The guy does excellent work, and shared my excitement when the car pulled a good time at the drags.

This was in stark contrast to the other turbo builders who just wanted me to stop asking questions and start throwing money at them.

Supercharger would fix these low down boost issues :P

It's all about matching the stall converter and turbo, I have no idea where Tao got the idea we all want 300kw on petrol. 250 would be a more realistic figure without going to a 3k stally.

We want a turbo that produces the most amount of average torque between 2500-6500rpm. I'm thinking small turbo high boost or less rotational mass ie: ceramic turbine, Gamma Ti Turbine, Ti alloy.

EVO 9 RS turbocharger CHRA into OEM housings ?

TDO5HRA-16G6C-10.5T (ti alloy turbine, magnesium alloy compressor) Possibly replace the comp wheel for high boost.

I made 272awkw on E85 on my Tommei Mak EVO, response was silly

Pitty these turbo's spin the opposite way....

maybe a titanium compressor wheel that enables 50 plus degree backswept angles. This gives bigger flow for less rotational mass.

www.google.com/patents/US20060067829

Matt

Edited by BoostdR

Scottys old setup with the garret and external gate and 3k stally is the perfect setup

But cost wise is up there cause all custom made

I've been through 4 setups so far

Ss1

Ss2

Gt3071 standard housing

Gtx3071r garret

The torque and response this thing has is bloody awesome sitting at about 330kw with more to improve in the future

  • Like 1

30kw gain with a lag penalty. The torque was through the roof though.

I have since realised the torque gains with the external gate and larger housings is worth more than any dyno can show. At least my gearbox is happy now.

(Edit, remember the GT3071 is a cropped rear wheel compared to the 60mm GTX turbine.)

Once these wagons are on boost the torque curve is incredibly flat, much better than the RB25. Makes for an enjoyable wave of acceleration. I found -4 degrees timing at 6500 rpm helps my trans shift. All other high load cells have +5 degrees on E85, light load/cruise has +8.5

I've also had great success with the EMU auto tune and my innovate LC-2 wideband. Tune is within .2 AFR with no input from me apart from a drive through the hills.

Once I work out how to get a speed input from somewhere I'll also setup launch control..

Do you have a boost curve available scotty? would be good to see. I agree, dyno doesn't show the big picture at all. A boost curve at part throttle would highlight transient response and separate the boys from the men.

[quote name="Boostdr

Once I work out how to get a speed input from somewhere I'll also setup launch control..

There is a speed sensor in the back of yhe dvd rom

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah i found that alot of parts can be wrong or "very" hard to get the real right one. I already bought some brakes years ago on me "old" GT calipers and they were wrong too 😄  I told them too. Even send them pictures...but they said "EBC catalogue has them on my car... So i dont know what their answer will be. I call monday them and let them know that they are really not on my car. If they were they would be already on a car...
    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
×
×
  • Create New...