Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi Sau.

I am fully aware that different dyno's = different power output, and generally you will not get the same result twice, even on the same dyno and same conditions.

My question is this.

I had my 34R tuned (power FC, front pipe/metal cat/3.5 inch exhaust and boost restrictor removed)

On this dyno, it netted me 263 atw on a 4 wheel dyno

I am now getting Garret - 7 turbos, hks evc 5 and a retune at a different workshop.

They have put the car on the dyno for the "Before tune" run, and this came up with only 213awkw on a 4 wheel dyno.

I was expecting a variance of about 10-15kw give or take, but 50kw seems to be huge.

Reading the RB26 dyno thread, the 263awkw power range for my mods seem to be in line with the average 34R owner.

Is it more likely that the new workshop the car is at is a very low reading dyno?

I guess I'll find out once i get the car back :-)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/445780-dyno-variances/
Share on other sites

Thread should get good so I'm in!

The track doesn't lie.

Care to elaborate. Good in what way mate...

As i said in my original post, I am aware of dyno variances, and that dyno operators can change load etc to make a "happy" dyno. That said, as per RB26 dyno thread, with my mods, the majority of GTR owners achieve between 240-260 atw.

For a dyno to throw 213kw is very low.

I guess you're right. Track will separate the men from the boys ey.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/445780-dyno-variances/#findComment-7343101
Share on other sites

I meant good sarcastically.

Missed the smiley ;)

Remember that it's not just inflated high figures, a low initial run is also beneficial for the shop for impressive printouts.

Of course there could have been a reason for your car putting out lower power. Boost leak etc.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/445780-dyno-variances/#findComment-7343119
Share on other sites

^ dyno wars lol.. that's what he meant

Maybe the previous operator ran it in 4th and maybe this one ran it in 5th (being a R34 GT-R, 5th gear is 1:1 as it's a 6 speed).

Mine didn't change power much between different gears, only the torque went through the roof.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/445780-dyno-variances/#findComment-7343126
Share on other sites

I concur with the strapping & wheelspin point.

Face it......losses in the drivetrain are not as large as the difference between flywheel power and wheel power would have you believe. If they were, then the oil would boil in gearboxes and diffs in a single dyno pull (just based on the massive number of kW of energy dumped into those oils). Therefore, the power must be going somewhere. And the tyre/roller interface is the single best candidate. Face it - those things are spinning around really fast, so they are well cooled. They definitely have slip at the interface, and we all can see that the harder you strap the car down the more power it makes, so therefore power is definitely being lost in slip.

And that's before you get to the paranoid android stuff involving workshops doing low reading initial runs to make any mods they do look better.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/445780-dyno-variances/#findComment-7343172
Share on other sites

It's a tad frustrating that there seems to be a culture of automatically assuming that a workshop/dyno/tuner who produces dyno results which read a bit higher than what you are used to the results/tuner are potentially misleading or dishonest and sometimes the info is taken less seriously.

50kw sounds like a LOT to lose, dyno variance or otherwise - you'll certainly be able to tell if the car is as much quicker after the retune as the numbers would indicate.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/445780-dyno-variances/#findComment-7343179
Share on other sites

I was told my car had 330wkw, it was retuned to 260wkw and feels faster, so explain that one!

I think the first run might have been done in RWD, and the second in AWD, but even so, it seems like a huge difference!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/445780-dyno-variances/#findComment-7343233
Share on other sites

Power delivery. What you lost in peak power you may have gained everywhere else

So you think he lost 70rwkw and gained what in the midrange? Makes no sense. Yes power delivery and area under the curve are what counts but come on.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/445780-dyno-variances/#findComment-7343296
Share on other sites

I was told my car had 330wkw, it was retuned to 260wkw and feels faster, so explain that one!

I think the first run might have been done in RWD, and the second in AWD, but even so, it seems like a huge difference!

Feels faster or is faster?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/445780-dyno-variances/#findComment-7343314
Share on other sites

The term of 1HP, is defined by people and more specifically to the people whom builds dyno meters.

There are no obvious concepts proves one's terminology is at mistake, so there will not be an matching dyno reading between two branded dyno meters.

On top of it, there are configurations determined by operator that could alter an precise output, as well as the extend of vehicle setup on particular dyno meters.

Seeking psychological balance as well as for the sake of promoting successful businesses. Owners whom bought a lower reading dyno will likely to argue that their reading stand for the absolute accuracy while others are inflated, While operator with an higher reading dyno might argue the lower reading dynos are poorly calibrated, On the end every one is there to defend for their own investment, While the true focus of a car can only produce so much "HP" with given fuel and given supporting mods at optimum calibration is lost.

Dyno is just a tool. so the quotation of what a specific setup is capable of doing is more accurately served based on past experiences of an likely setup. As I quote the capacity of my turbochargers to relatively common turbochargers which past collection of data is plentiful. Alternatively quote based on a percentage gain based on factory output. That way it is more meaningful then just a number.

Besides, for people whom value the safety of their own and others on road, the maximum potential of a engine is rarely used. It might be worth while for some tuners advertising drive ability and fuel consumption rather then just peek power. Which I prefer if tuners might be able to put some explanations into their work and spend some time educate people how a car should be tuned based on Torque, AFR, Timing, and Fuel maps. That way not only ensures the vehicle is tuned to their maximum potential, and most importantly let customers understand what their maximum potential is, in reference to supporting mods installed.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/445780-dyno-variances/#findComment-7343349
Share on other sites

long story short, dyno a tuning tool to safely determine max torque and load up the motor without snapping out sideways and getting pulled over by cops.

Want to test power? go do a quarter mile.. that never lies (technical constraints apply, such as: tyres, weather, surface temperature, driver ability, not getting kicked off the track because you ran a 10, etc.)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/445780-dyno-variances/#findComment-7343384
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • As discussed in the previous post, the bushes in the 110 needed replacing. I took this opportunity to replace the castor bushes, the front lower control arm, lower the car and get the alignment dialled in with new tyres. I took it down to Alignment Motorsports on the GC to get this work done and also get more out of the Shockworks as I felt like I wasn't getting the full use out of them.  To cut a very long story short, it ended up being the case the passenger side castor arm wouldn't accept the brand new bush as the sleeve had worn badly enough to the point you could push the new bush in by hand and completely through. Trying a pair of TRD bushes didn't fix the issue either (I had originally gone with Hardrace bushes). We needed to urgently source another castor arm, and thankfully this was sourced and the guys at the shop worked on my car until 7pm on a Saturday to get everything done. The car rides a lot nicer now with the suspension dialled in properly. Lowered the car a little as well to suit the lower profile front tyres, and just bring the car down generally. Eternally thankful for the guys down at the shop to get the car sorted, we both pulled big favours from our contacts to get it done on the Saturday.  Also plugged in the new Stedi foglights into the S15, and even from a quick test in the garage I'm keen to see how they look out on the road. I had some concerns about the length of the LED body and whether it'd fit in the foglight housing but it's fine.  I've got a small window coming up next month where I'll likely get a little paint work done on the 110 to remove the rear wing, add a boot wing and roof wing, get the side skirt fixed up and colour match the little panel on the tail lights so that I can install some badges that I've kept in storage. I'm also tempted to put in a new pair of headlights on the 110.  Until then, here's some more pictures from Easter this year. 
    • I would put a fuel pressure gauge between the filter and the fuel rail, see if it's maintaining good fuel pressure at idle going up to the point when it stalls. Do you see any strange behavior in commanded fuel leading up to the point when it stalls? You might have to start going through the service manual and doing a long list of sensor tests if it's not the fuel system for whatever reason.
    • Hi,  Just joined the forum so I could share my "fix" of this problem. Might be of use to someone. Had the same hunting at idle issue on my V36 with VQ35HR engine after swapping the engine because the original one got overheated.  While changing the engine I made the mistake of cleaning the throttle bodies and tried all the tricks i could find to do a throttle relearn with no luck. Gave in and took it to a shop and they couldn't sort it. Then took it to my local Nissan dealership and they couldn't get it to idle properly. They said I'd need to replace the throttle bodies and the ecu probably costing more than the car is worth. So I had the idea of replacing the carbon I cleaned out with a thin layer of super glue and it's back to normal idle now. Bit rough but saved the car from the wreckers 🤣
    • After my last update, I went ahead with cleaning and restoring the entire fuel system. This included removing the tank and cleaning it with the Beyond Balistics solution, power washing it multiple times, drying it thoroughly, rinsing with IPA, drying again with heat gun and compressed air. Also, cleaning out the lines, fuel rail, and replacing the fuel pump with an OEM-style one. During the cleaning process, I replaced several hoses - including the breather hose on the fuel tank, which turned out to be the cause of the earlier fuel leak. This is what the old fuel filter looked like: Fuel tank before cleaning: Dirty Fuel Tank.mp4   Fuel tank after cleaning (some staining remains): Clean Fuel Tank.mp4 Both the OEM 270cc and new DeatschWerks 550cc injectors were cleaned professionally by a shop. Before reassembling everything, I tested the fuel flow by running the pump output into a container at the fuel filter location - flow looked good. I then fitted the new fuel filter and reassembled the rest of the system. Fuel Flow Test.mp4 Test 1 - 550cc injectors Ran the new fuel pump with its supplied diagonal strainer (different from OEM’s flat strainer) and my 550cc injectors using the same resized-injector map I had successfully used before. At first, it idled roughly and stalled when I applied throttle. Checked the spark plugs and found that they were fouled with carbon (likely from the earlier overly rich running when the injectors were clogged). After cleaning the plugs, the car started fine. However, it would only idle for 30–60 seconds before stalling, and while driving it would feel like a “fuel cut” after a few seconds - though it wouldn’t fully stall. Test 2 – Strainer swap Suspecting the diagonal strainer might not be reaching the tank bottom, I swapped it for the original flat strainer and filled the tank with ~45L of fuel. The issue persisted exactly the same. Test 3 – OEM injectors To eliminate tuning variables, I reinstalled the OEM 270cc injectors and reverted to the original map. Cleaned the spark plugs again just in-case. The stalling and “fuel cut” still remained.   At this stage, I suspect an intermittent power or connection fault at the fuel pump hanger, caused during the cleaning process. This has led me to look into getting Frenchy’s fuel hanger and replacing the unit entirely. TL;DR: Cleaned and restored the fuel system (tank, lines, rail, pump). Tested 550cc injectors with the same resized-injector map as before, but the car stalls at idle and experiences what feels like “fuel cut” after a few seconds of driving. Swapped back to OEM injectors with original map to rule out tuning, but the issue persists. Now suspecting an intermittent power or connection fault at the fuel pump hanger, possibly cause by the cleaning process.  
×
×
  • Create New...