Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  On 04/03/2015 at 4:01 AM, Piggaz said:

Get in the Tiida and just rock up.

Take the keys off Jimbo and rip a launch up the street.

Wish it was that easy, after I get the OK I have to get the girls looked after and book a flight to Sydney

You are one sick puppy Paul :spank: nice butt :3some:

I don't think so, said it was the first run ??

It is just about impossible to speak to anyone that knows what is going on and only get info second hand ?

Sure will be glad when it is over :)

I am sure they feel the same way :)

I am not the best at reading graphs but next week I will know how it feels when I have my fat arse on the seat and a 350 Klm drive home, going to use the old Highway to give it some work away from the Freeway :)

I hope there is a heap better graph once the final tune is done :/

  On 07/03/2015 at 2:11 AM, Mick_o said:

Cars gunna be a beast Pete :)

Tell them to give an RPM graph not speed :P

I'll sit down and work out the rpm points tomorrow.... When I'm sober.

Hi Mick-o , I asked that question before and I think they said they cannot do it with their Dyno program, I would think you could make the program do what you want it to ??

  On 07/03/2015 at 3:20 AM, Piggaz said:

Lol.

Well you wouldn't get thirsty chasing a bream around in the river now... ;)

haha, what an arse, that was a secret, my phone did not enjoy it LOL

Needs more boost!!

Good to see it going ( I too cannot understand why some people show mph instead of rpm).

My guess is the final figure will be between 400 and 500 awkw - anywhere in that range should do!

  • Like 1
  On 07/03/2015 at 3:59 AM, KiwiRS4T said:

Needs more boost!!

Good to see it going ( I too cannot understand why some people show mph instead of rpm).

My guess is the final figure will be between 400 and 500 awkw - anywhere in that range should do!

Hi Bob, just want it finished and hopefully give me the responsive results I have worked to get, well paid to get :)

Looking at 400awkw ish on 98 pump. maybe 450 with E85.

Does not matter at this stage, I just want my car back :)

I'd say 5 months is probably ahead of time on a build like this by a professional workshop....

There will be a month or more of a bit of back and forth once delivered to sort any small issues, run in and re-tune etc.

... it's better not to hope for a number on a page, regardless of what the car makes on that dyno on that day on that fuel your allways just a little dissaponted.

... these days I just rock up and go 'it make what it makes'

Cheers

J.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...