Jump to content
SAU Community

Would you become a contributor of SAU?  

102 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

broke-is-expensive.gif

We have started losing money due to a very low advertising climate and need to consider new methods for maintaining the site.

If we were to re-introduce paid contributor plans again, would you be interested?

We're thinking;

  • Yearly 'support' membership
  • Two new-style SAU.com.au stickers (or more?)
  • Ability to edit own posts
  • Increased PM space
  • Removed flood control
  • 'Contributor' bar under username
  • Maybe (!!) access to an un-moderated member area

What do you think?

Let us know via the poll and in the replies.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/453558-want-to-become-an-sau-contributor/
Share on other sites

I'm happy to contribute to a forum that means a lot to me considering it has equally assisted me in many ways over the years.

As long as the contribution is affordable and applied reasonably to the running/maintenance of the website and consequently the number of advertising banners are reduced.

  • Like 3

More than happy to contribute.

Site is beneficial for knowledge, technical info, buy/sell parts, social rants etc....

small banners top and bottom no longer bother me on the PC (part of life on the internet now - no more adds though!)

Serious question. How much does it cost to run a forum board like SAU? Ballpark is fine.

Just the hosting and backups is around $1k per month. Then theres Company costs and taxes, external suppliers we use for things like sending mail etc. Tis expensive. :)

I'm happy to contribute. I've been wanting to for years but the structure hasn't been in place.

I'll contribute in it's current form with the ability to edit posts please! Anything else is bonus.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yep, the closest base tune available was for the GTT, I went with that and made all the logical changes I could find to convert it to Naturally Aspirated. It will rev fine in Neutral to redline but it will be cutting nearly 50% fuel the whole way.  If I let it tune the fuel map to start with that much less fuel it wont run right and has a hard time applying corrections.  These 50% cuts are with a fuel map already about half of what the GTT tune had.  I was having a whole lot of bogging when applying any throttle but seem to have fixed that for no load situations with very aggressive transient throttle settings. I made the corrections to my injectors with data I found for them online, FBCJC100 flowing 306cc.  I'll have to look to see if I can find the Cam section. I have the Bosch 4.9 from Haltech. My manifold pressure when watching it live is always in -5.9 psi/inHg
    • Hi My Tokico BM50 Brake master cylinder has a leak from the hole between the two outlets (M10x1) for brake pipes, I have attached a photo. Can anyone tell me what that hole is and what has failed to allow brake fluid to escape from it, I have looked on line and asked questions on UK forums but can not find the answer, if anyone can enlighten me I would be most grateful.
    • It will be a software setting. I don't believe many on here ever used AEM. And they're now a discontinued product,that's really hard to find any easy answers on. If it were Link or Haltech, someone would be able to just send you a ECU file though.
    • Yes sir am asking is there possible way from aem tuner from wiring pins 
    • Have you checked cam to crank timing and confirmed balancer marks are correct?
×
×
  • Create New...