Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Personally I use JE/Nitto

Your topic may start discussion but wont provide a unanimous outcome.

I'm not aware of a comparison across the range.

Consider your build holistically !

against your goals, your capabilities and the depth of your wallet

I just found this, I wonder if mahle are the same as cosworth material composition.

I believe all CP pistons are made from 2618 alloy and Cosworth's Subaru pistons from 4032. 4032 is a high silicon alloy and the high silicon content provides a more durable wear surface and reduced expansion rate. 2618 is a denser alloy with higher tensile strength and a higher heat transfer rate.

4032 is a better option for a street application where low wear, long life, and reduced noise is of primary importance.

2618 is a better option for a race-specific application between the piston crown will run a little cooler and the piston will withstand detonation a little bit better than 4032. But the piston has less wear resistance and actually less stiffness.

However, Cosworth pistons use a boxed bridge design developed in F1. If you look at the back of the piston the pin bosses are reinforced with additional cross-struts and the pin itself is quite short. The bending loads on the pin bosses are reduced and overall the piston, skirt, and crown have greater rigidity. I don't think the Cosworth piston gives up anything in terms of overall strength compared to CP.

Cosworth pistons use a pin offset for reduced piston slap noise. CP pistons have no pin offset which is why they are not directional. Another reason for a very low noise level from Cosworth pistons.

Cosworth pistons have a polished crown which supposedly reduces carbon build up over time....probably another plus for a street application.

Theres a piston thread in the RB30 section, I think the wiseco are a good choice cause of tighter clearances possible but depends on power goals etc.. I chose to go with stock unopened bottom end cause its a pain and expensive to stuff around with engine builders that might stuff it up anyway... have faith in the OEM lol... nearly 30year old but yeah haha

So much potential for awesomeness. But to take it seriously before it reaches its inevitable train wreck of a conclusion.... Nah.

Carillo rods cause a bloke called Fred someone once used them in a race car which crashed into a wall and won a race. Must be awesome then.

Pistons. Well actually who cares. The most important thing about the piston in an rb26 is the rings and gettting a good seal. The rest of it doesnt matter. So best piston is a stock Nissan one. Take the Nissan out and you get oil puke unless you are really picky with your selection and run in.

CSB.

On the topic of rods, the weak point on H beams is usually the bolts anyway. I had to cough up an extra few hundred to get the ARP 625+ rod bolts in my Evo stroker kit.

Pistons... Well my stock Nissan VQ pistons have taken 40psi at the track many times, so have the rods. All I did to the stock engine was bolt the heads down harder with L19's after they lifted. As long as you keep the combustion temps under control the stock pistons would do fine.

  • Like 2

Tomei? My Tomei's are slight on startup. No piston slap and no blow by.

Its more of the engineering job that will make the most difference.

Make sure you use a good/the best engineer you can and whatever forged piston you use should do the job.

Depends on what you intend to do, there is no 1 rod or piston that's best for all situations everything is a compromise in certain directions.

Pistons can vary depending on what the build is, you wont build a high revving drag engine with the heaviest pistons with long skirts and you wont get far building a daily or long distance race engine with the lightest short skirt pistons.

Same deal on the rods, pins, rings etc.

Many people overlook the design aspect of parts and just see a brand name, put focus on the build purpose and then look at a piston or rod design to suit the application.

Basics like assembly weight which you want to keep low in high revving applications or highish to allow longevity through support and material strength for longer lasting lower RPM builds as some other basics to consider.

Its like comparing a Mahle and JE piston, 2 totally different designs from many points of view.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Kapr Haha yeah thats the one. I missed that you had a built up engine, I wouldn't want to run it on there either then. It was good in my situation just to replace the original turbo on a stock engine. @MBS206Yep definitely not a replacement for anything name brand
    • You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
×
×
  • Create New...