Jump to content
SAU Community

Vic Wasteland Thread - 15.0

R31Nismoid

By R31Nismoid,
in Victoria

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 18.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Birds

    3388

  • joeyjoejoejuniorshabadoo

    2307

  • Leroy Peterson

    2241

  • UNR33L

    1870

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

blah_blah
blah_blah

This is where the cost of a Tax accountant that knows what they are doing outweighs the costs   FYI $300/h

Mohsen
Mohsen

this has been covered many times before on this forum, please use the search function.

Mohsen
Mohsen

tokyo is so f**king cool.

Posted Images

emts Grand Master

emts

Posted
Posted

not sure it a secret

Nah

Mine is a 26/30

He did tell me about that one though

Dropped in on him today to give him a push, fkin busier than ever. If you say tall guy from the east with the blonde gf he'll know who you're talking about...

Birds Grand Master

Birds

Posted
Posted

I don't care about the top end just yet and the car came with GT-SS...a top end that dies off at 400awkw is still a fast car. Is it fast enough so we can fly away? I don't know.

Everyone goes for 11ty unusable gearbox breaking kw in their GTR...rather do something cheaper, different and friendlier for the street. Acceleration in any gear at any rpm, that's the plan.

Kinkstaah Grand Master

Kinkstaah

Posted
Posted

Tbh my car fell apart with a GTX3076R which maxes out at 400rwkw (on manual) because it was too responsive. Having to set a rev limit at 5900 rpm is kind of lol.

Would suspect same issue with GTSS-s and a RB30, but maybe not. You gotta give it a go, and the turbos are already with the car so f**kit why not?

I had other issues relating to dat dere 14s pass :P

joeyjoejoejuniorshabadoo Grand Master

joeyjoejoejuniorshabadoo

Posted
Posted

It's just a preference i hold for runing through revs.

For example, I preferred my car to Al's. Both 330rwkw but his was on it by 2k and over by 6k whereas mine was 3k to 7.5k

Both massive fun... very different animals though

blah_blah Grand Master

blah_blah

Posted
Posted

Tbh my car fell apart with a GTX3076R which maxes out at 400rwkw (on manual) because it was too responsive. Having to set a rev limit at 5900 rpm is kind of lol.

Would suspect same issue with GTSS-s and a RB30, but maybe not. You gotta give it a go, and the turbos are already with the car so f**kit why not?

I had other issues relating to dat dere 14s pass :P

And yours is only a 2.8L as well!

I thought it reached max power well before 5.9k rpm?

UNR33L Grand Master

UNR33L

Posted
Posted (edited)

It's just a preference i hold for runing through revs.

For example, I preferred my car to Al's. Both 330hub kw but his was on it by 2k and over by 6k whereas mine was 3k to 7.5k

Both massive fun... very different animals though

fyp

Edited by UNR33L
Birds Grand Master

Birds

Posted
Posted

Swapping down the track isn't too difficult...GT-SS hold their value well and usually worth a little more than -5, so I'm looking at the cost of a turbo swap and a retune for bigger turbos if I want more power. I love my responsive GTS-T though and would want a similar set up in the R.

Only need to put low boost through a 30 to get big numbers, plus it'll be E85 after the 98 tune.

Birds Grand Master

Birds

Posted
Posted

You really think youll hit 400awkw? Thats more than just a decent motor to get that far

Barry believes it, with E85. RB26s with 98 make about 340-350 with GT-SS.

joeyjoejoejuniorshabadoo Grand Master

joeyjoejoejuniorshabadoo

Posted
Posted

Swapping down the track isn't too difficult...GT-SS hold their value well and usually worth a little more than -5, so I'm looking at the cost of a turbo swap and a retune for bigger turbos if I want more power. I love my responsive GTS-T though and would want a similar set up in the R.

Only need to put low boost through a 30 to get big numbers, plus it'll be E85 after the 98 tune.

have you driven a 3.0 RB?

the difference the displacement makes is a lot more than you would expect.

it should be a fair whack more responsive than your gtst

Al's car is like a freaking V8

blah_blah Grand Master

blah_blah

Posted
Posted

Barry believes it, with E85. RB26s with 98 make about 340-350 with GT-SS.

Interesting

Steve 34R aka R8TED only made 317kw on the racepace dyno on e85 and -9's. Not sure what the norm is, maybe Matt Borci will throw in his 2 cents

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Kinkstaah
      RB25DE NEO with Haltech ECU

      By Kinkstaah · Posted

      @Haggerty this is your red flag. In MAP based ECU's the Manifold pressure X RPM calculation is how the engine knows it is actually...running/going through ANY load. You are confusing the term 'base map' with your base VE/Fuel table. When most people say 'base map' they mean the stock entire tune shipped with the ECU, hopefully aimed at a specific car/setup to use as a base for beginning to tune your specific car. Haltech has a lot of documentation (or at least they used to, I expect it to be better now). Read it voraciously.
    • GTSBoy
      RB25DE NEO with Haltech ECU

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      I saw you mention this earlier and it raised a red flag, but I couldn't believe it was real. Yes, the vacuum signal should vary. It is the one and only load signal from the engine to the ECU, and it MUST vary. It is either not connected or is badly f**ked up in some way.
    • Murray_Calavera
      RB25DE NEO with Haltech ECU

      By Murray_Calavera · Posted

      @Haggerty you still haven't answered my question.  Many things you are saying do not make sense for someone who can tune, yet I would not expect someone who cannot tune to be playing with the things in the ECU that you are.  This process would be a lot quicker to figure out if we can remove user error from the equation. 
    • MBS206
      R32 GTS (RB20DE) Injectors Replacement

      By MBS206 · Posted

      If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • Haggerty
      RB25DE NEO with Haltech ECU

      By Haggerty · Posted

      I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
×
×
  • Create New...