Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • 1 month later...

Not too much in the way of updates as I've been working remote a bit lately.

Have had the driveshaft's overhauled and had it back on the dyno chasing more midrange which was successful.

Now just trying to enjoy her for the moment, a few pics from the weekend taken by a mate.

IMG_5479.JPG

IMG_5480.JPG

  • Like 3
  • 2 months later...
  • 2 weeks later...

Added another car to the stable...a Sil80.

Will use this for doing the things I'm now too soft to do in the GTR :blush:

Needs a bit of work but couldn't knock it back for the $$$ already has blacktop SR20, R32 GTR brakes (5 stud) etc...

IMG_6001.JPG

IMG_6002.JPG

IMG_6003.JPG

  • Like 3
On ‎23‎/‎06‎/‎2016 at 2:02 PM, mr_rbman said:

5 - Removed my front Bilstiens as one had begun to leak and have sent them off to Quadrant suspensions in Victoria for a rebuild (significantly cheaper than anyone here in Adelaide :()

post-16187-0-16481400-1466661234_thumb.jpg

 

 

Just out of interest what is the model number of the Bilsteins and how long is the shock body?

  • 3 weeks later...
On ‎7‎/‎11‎/‎2016 at 3:42 PM, djr81 said:

Just out of interest what is the model number of the Bilsteins and how long is the shock body?

I'll suss it out for you next time they're out the car.

have just entered a tarmac rally event and may pull them out prior time pending....

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

Picked up some Enkei RPF01's in exact same sizes as my Rays Impul RSII's (18 x 9.5" +15 all round), bit of an impulse buy.

Love my other rims in the flesh but black on grey doesn't look the best in photos, Love the gold enkei's in photos but unsure about them in the flesh, mmmmmm.

Put my other rims up for sale but probably won't be too disappointed if they don't sell.

 

IMG_6296.JPG

IMG_6298.JPG

IMG_6304.PNG

IMG_6307.JPG

  • Like 1
11 hours ago, okooko said:

ive got the same in matte black - those are the best straight up fit for the r32

love the offsetting colors

what rubber you got on those?

They came with some plain almost brand new Achilles ATR sports but I'm trying to move them on and have ordered some Nankang NS-2R semi slicks, the reviews they get seem to be hard to go past for a weekend warrior which sees the odd hillclimb for <$150 a corner.

1 hour ago, GH05T said:

LOVE THE WHEELS MAN, SUCH A GOOD SIMPLE DESIGN WHICH FITS THE 32

 

 

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH sorry caps :P

Cheers Glyn, a few gunmetal grey 32 GTR's getting round Adelaide at the moment, think we need to have just a gunmetal meet up soon :1_grinning:

  • Like 1
  • 3 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...