Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, s2d4 said:

Hopefully people will start posting turbo speed, since it's absolutely crucial for these EFR's

Nicks has the speed sensor installed but the road rage gauge was faulty. If it doesn't get fixed soon the speed sensor will go straight back to the ECU.

  • Like 1
17 hours ago, Nismo 3.2ish said:

Someone had to start it again, lets hope it does not get bogged down with BS ?

But it is hard to find info on the EFRs ?

I think because there are so many build types for Skylines now ranging from stock  to over 3.2Lt , it is also hard to have back to back comparisons.

But from what I can find out,  the EFR8374 will get me going quicker, with a much better transient response and roughly to the same top HP as my PT6266 Gen 2 ?

Hopefully some back to back comparisons :)

So put it on already

8 hours ago, usmair said:

I might do the speed sensor in the next couple of weeks

Can you do a little test for me? 4th gear flat road, low rpm, load it up and see when you hit 15psi?

PS. Very nice result, I'm guessing it's going to be awesome to drive

Edited by SimonR32
  • Like 1
3 hours ago, SimonR32 said:

Can you do a little test for me? 4th gear flat road, low rpm, load it up and see when you hit 15psi?

PS. Very nice result, I'm guessing it's going to be awesome to drive

will give it a go on the weekend.... what i've found from with this turbo is that it goes from 10 to 30 very quicky so trying to find exactly when 15 comes will be tricky

As promised

6262 vs 8374

Both stock rb26 on e85 with relatively small cams (i think my brother has 260s and i've got 256s)

6262 made that power on 32 psi by memory. 8374 is on 30psi. 6262 can probably go to 480kw where as my EFR can probably stretch to 550kw if pushed so there is more top end with the Borg Warner

The difference in torque is immense! (not sure if those are just weird dyno numbers though).

Both cars are making 90-100kw around 3900rpm. At 4700RPM the 6262 is around 275kw whereas the BW is making just over 300kw. After that its a walk over and the BW just takes it.

At 5500 Rpm the 6262 is at 370kw where as the BW is around 440kw

The 6262 is on a r34 whereas mine is a r33 so the 6 speed gearing may also be having an impact (it should be helping with response on the 6262 right???)

Very very interesting.

 

 

 

6262 vs 8374.jpg

Edited by usmair

Strong results on the 8374! Any clue what it made on 18-19 psi range? Trying to estimate what i should expect as gains when i move to E85 and 30+ psi.

Just now, HarrisRacing said:

Strong results on the 8374! Any clue what it made on 18-19 psi range? Trying to estimate what i should expect as gains when i move to E85 and 30+ psi.

my gate pressure is around 20psi and it made 380-390kw on e85

  • Like 1
my gate pressure is around 20psi and it made 380-390kw on e85


Then I'm right on target. 93 pump and 17-18 psi was 464 whp for me. (Your results convert to 510-523 whp). I'm probably 500 wheel now at 20 psi (haven't dyno'd). So I am now more motivated than ever to make the move and crank the boost up!

Thanks!
6 hours ago, usmair said:

As promised

6262 vs 8374

Both stock rb26 on e85 with relatively small cams (i think my brother has 260s and i've got 256s)

6262 made that power on 32 psi by memory. 8374 is on 30psi. 6262 can probably go to 480kw where as my EFR can probably stretch to 550kw if pushed so there is more top end with the Borg Warner

The difference in torque is immense! (not sure if those are just weird dyno numbers though).

Both cars are making 90-100kw around 3900rpm. At 4700RPM the 6262 is around 275kw whereas the BW is making just over 300kw. After that its a walk over and the BW just takes it.

At 5500 Rpm the 6262 is at 370kw where as the BW is around 440kw

The 6262 is on a r34 whereas mine is a r33 so the 6 speed gearing may also be having an impact (it should be helping with response on the 6262 right???)

Very very interesting.

 

 

 

6262 vs 8374.jpg

How do they drive? Which one "stands up" quicker?

7 hours ago, usmair said:

As promised

6262 vs 8374

Both stock rb26 on e85 with relatively small cams (i think my brother has 260s and i've got 256s)

6262 made that power on 32 psi by memory. 8374 is on 30psi. 6262 can probably go to 480kw where as my EFR can probably stretch to 550kw if pushed so there is more top end with the Borg Warner

The difference in torque is immense! (not sure if those are just weird dyno numbers though).

Both cars are making 90-100kw around 3900rpm. At 4700RPM the 6262 is around 275kw whereas the BW is making just over 300kw. After that its a walk over and the BW just takes it.

At 5500 Rpm the 6262 is at 370kw where as the BW is around 440kw

The 6262 is on a r34 whereas mine is a r33 so the 6 speed gearing may also be having an impact (it should be helping with response on the 6262 right???)

Very very interesting.

 

Thanks good to get something solid for comparisons, but It would have been a little better comparison if the PT6266 CEA Gen 2 (800BHP) was used instead of the 6262 CEA (705BHP) as the 8374 & 6266 are rated at 800BHP if you are looking for a bottom and top end HP comparisons, I think :)

1 hour ago, Nismo 3.2ish said:

Thanks good to get something solid for comparisons, but It would have been a little better comparison if the PT6266 CEA Gen 2 (800BHP) was used instead of the 6262 CEA (705BHP) as the 8374 & 6266 are rated at 800BHP if you are looking for a bottom and top end HP comparisons, I think :)

Can only work with what we've got.......

2 hours ago, Nismo 3.2ish said:

Thanks good to get something solid for comparisons, but It would have been a little better comparison if the PT6266 CEA Gen 2 (800BHP) was used instead of the 6262 CEA (705BHP) as the 8374 & 6266 are rated at 800BHP if you are looking for a bottom and top end HP comparisons, I think :)

Pretty fair to say you're on a winner with an 8374 then Pete if a little 6262 with .84 rear is making similar power down low as a larger turbo with a much bigger turbine housing ?

So your manifold is single gate Usmair? Does your brother run the same manifold? 

Are they both single gate setups? 

I think there is a little more to be had with a proper twin scroll twin gate setup ☺

Thanks for sharing some data too mate. 

I think you should give us a drive review between the 2 also ?

Edited by Mick_o
  • Like 1
6 minutes ago, Mick_o said:

Pretty fair to say you're on a winner with an 8374 then Pete if a little 6262 with .84 rear is making similar power down low as a larger turbo with a much bigger turbine housing ?

So your manifold is single gate Usmair? Does your brother run the same manifold? 

Are they both single gate setups? 

I think there is a little more to be had with a proper twin scroll twin gate setup ☺

Thanks for sharing some data too mate. 

I think you should give us a drive review between the 2 also ?

that is a good point actually.... my manifold is a split pulse but its single gate. My brothers is a split pulse twin gate setup so there is probably a little bit more response to be had out of the twin gate BW setup.

I'll try to take them both for a spin back to back on the weekend.

Usmair, I asked in another thread but you prob didn't see it. Why are the dyno runs done in 3rd on your R33 and in 4th in the r34?? Reason I ask is I tried comparing it to my old graph and realized they were different speeds.

Does this make a difference in response and power reading on a graph or would it be same shit.

I love the response I have at the moment but I'd like more top end too, I really don't wanna upgrade to something that'll make it too much laggier.

I'm gathering as much info atm on these turbos, they look like a dream!!

3 hours ago, Piggaz said:

Are the gates plumbed in or VTA, Usmair?

VTA

2 hours ago, Buraz said:

Usmair, I asked in another thread but you prob didn't see it. Why are the dyno runs done in 3rd on your R33 and in 4th in the r34?? Reason I ask is I tried comparing it to my old graph and realized they were different speeds.

Does this make a difference in response and power reading on a graph or would it be same shit.

I love the response I have at the moment but I'd like more top end too, I really don't wanna upgrade to something that'll make it too much laggier.

I'm gathering as much info atm on these turbos, they look like a dream!!

no idea why it was done in 3rd.... but i doubt it will make much of a difference as Paul mentioned.

Next dyno day that pops up I will throw it on to see how it comes on a different dyno.

For sh!ts and giggles more than anything else.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I thought that might be the case, thats what I'll start saving for. Thanks for the info 
    • Ps i found the below forum and it seems to be the same scenario Im dealing with. Going to check my ECU coolant temp wire tomorrow    From NICOclub forum: s1 RB25det flooding at start up Thu Apr 11, 2013 7:23 am I am completely lost on this. Car ran perfectly fine when I parked it at the end of the year. I took the engine out and painted the engine bay, and put a fuel cell with an inline walbro 255 instead of the in tank unit I had last year. After reinstalling everything, the engine floods when the fuel pump primes. if i pull the fuel pump fuse it'll start, and as soon as I put the fuse back in it starts running ridiculously rich. I checked the tps voltage, and its fine. Cleaned the maf as it had some dust from sitting on a shelf all winter, fuel pressure is correct while running, but wont fire until there is less than 5psi in the lines. The fuel lines are run correctly. I have found a few threads with the same problem but no actual explanation of what fixed it, the threads just ended. Any help would be appreciated. Rb25det s1 walbro255 fuel pump nismo fpr holset hx35 turbo fmic 3" exhaust freddy intake manifold q45tb q45 maf   Re: s1 RB25det flooding at start up Fri Apr 12, 2013 5:07 am No, I didn't. I found the problem though. There was a break in one of the ecu coolant temp sensor wires. Once it was repaired it fired right up with no problems. I would have never thought a non working coolant temp sensor would have caused such an issue.
    • Hi sorry late reply I didnt get a chance to take any pics (my mechanics on the other side of the city) but the plugs were fouled from being too rich. I noticed the MAF wasn't genuine, so I replaced it with a genuine green label unit. I also swapped in a different ignitor, but the issue remains. I've narrowed it down a bit now: - If I unplug and reconnect the fuel lines and install fresh spark plugs, the car starts right up and runs perfectly. Took it around the block with no issues - As soon as I shut it off and try to restart, it won't start again - Fuel pressure while cranking is steady around 40 psi, injectors have good spray, return line is clear, and the FPR vacuum is working. It just seems like it's getting flooded after the first start I unplugged coolant sensors to see if its related to ECU flooding but that didnt make a difference. Im thinking its related to this because this issue only started happening after fixing coolant leaks and replacing the bottom part of the stock manifolds coolant pipe. My mechanic took off the inlet to get to get to do these repairs. My mechanics actually just an old mate who's retired now so ill be taking it to a different mechanic who i know has exp with RBs to see if they find anything. If you have any ideas please send em lll give it a try. Ive tried other things like swapping the injectors, fuel rail, different fuel pressure regs, different ignitor, spark plugs, comp test and MAF but the same issue persists.
    • My return flow is custom and puts the return behind the reo, instead of at the bottom. All my core is in the air flow, rather than losing some of it up behind the reo. I realise that the core really acts more as a spiky heatsink than as a constant rate heat exchanger, and that therefore size is important.... but mine fits everything I needed and wanted without having to cut anything, and that's worth something too. And there won't be a hot patch of core up behind the reo after every hit, releasing heat back into the intake air.
    • There is a really fun solution to this problem, buy a Haltech (or ECU of your choice) and put the MAF in the bin.  I'm assuming your going to want more power in future, so you'll need to get the ECU at some stage. I'd put the new MAF money towards the new ECU. 
×
×
  • Create New...