Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, usmair said:

Can only work with what we've got.......

Umair , it was great to get your info, what I meant , if it had been the 6266 it would have made the 8374 low end response look even better , but I think the top end would be pretty close with both turbos

Umair,

I took the liberty of converting your results to excel and graphing them vs my pumpgas results (including corresponding boost curves). Looks like my combo of stock-bore 79mm stroker (2.75L) and/or the .92 IWG housing turbo is making a bit more bottom end than yours (below 4500 rpms), but obviously with higher boost and E85 you're crushing me anywhere over that. The boost is x10 for scaling purposes (ie 100 = 10 psi, 200 = 20 psi, etc). I'm willing to bet when converted to E85 and when I start pouring on the boost that I will make more power lower in the rpms, but not significantly so (maybe 250-300 rpms sooner), and with the increased backpressure of the .92 housing I'd bet I'll start dropping sooner as well.

Good looking dyno! :1311_thumbsup_tone2:

 

Dyno comparison to Umair.JPG

  • Like 2
Not really surprised there though. Bigger engine making more grunt down low.

How long till you put it on E85, Harris? 

Station is targeting completion in november. I'm hoping to have fuel pumps, 3.5" exhaust, and mega huge injectors done by then. I'm still on stock fmic so we will see what it can flow!

will need 100m cooler. the stockies have been known to hold power back over 400kw.

3.5" will do the job. Mine is 3.5". 4" only if you know you are going to aim for even bigger power in the future.

My injectors are 2000cc. I was told that even 1600cc on e85 wont cut the mustard for 500kw. Makes it a little harder to fine tune but its not noticeable in day to day drive.

thanks for mapping the dynos. interesting stuff!

  • Like 1

If anyone is interested, I'm maybe going to the SAU cruise to the Gosford car museum on Sunday.

Happy to take anyone for a spin so they can feel the setup for themselves.

Edited by usmair
if you need pricing on Plazmaman coolers @usmair give me a holla [emoji4]


What about me? Sounds like he's got a cooler.

I'm almost tapped on money these days (oilfield sucks here lately). I need a sponsor!
43 minutes ago, HarrisRacing said:


What about me? Sounds like he's got a cooler.

I'm almost tapped on money these days (oilfield sucks here lately). I need a sponsor!

haha but you're in the US.. shipping won't be cheap.. however happy to help out - flick me a PM on which size cooler your after, and if polished/black/raw etc..

What range of mph would you expect to get from 500kw 

 

138-140mph??

I would hope! Thats a ton of power. I ran 120 mph on 464 whp and you've got way more midrange.

On 9/3/2016 at 11:53 PM, Piggaz said:

Borg Warner EFR Series Turbo's V 2.0

 

Link to the first attempt. A wealth of knowledge in it. 

annnnd go!

We gonna be factual on this or its gonna b like the last one >_<

What wasn't factual in there? 

You must have some EFR experience to share with us if you know there was nothing factual in there? 

 

 

Edited by Mick_o
  • Like 2
On 9/10/2016 at 10:00 PM, Mick_o said:

What wasn't factual in there? 

You must have some EFR experience to share with us if you know there was nothing factual in there? 

 

 

at the end of the thread which got it locked . 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • If you take the top half of the intake off you can unbolt the flap off the shaft and leave the shaft in there blocking the hole. Then you can remove the little vacuum canister off from under the manifold and get a spare vacuum line to run to the ECU. I can take some photos of it later. Probably best to get the vacuum source to the ECU sorted first though. Mine all worked mint with the base map from the GTT an I've pretty much let the closed loop sort the fueling and took 1 degree out of the whole timing map.
    • This IS something you also have to configure in Haltech (or at least I did in the past when going from onboard-to-ECU map sensor and an external MAP sensor in haltech land).
    • I'm hoping it's something as simple as the ECU is looking for an external MAP sensor, but he is trying to use the onboard MAP sensor.
    • You won't need to do that if your happy to learn to tune it yourself. You 100% do not need to do that. It is not part of the learning process. It's not like driving on track and 'finding the limit by stepping over the limit'. You should not ever accidently blow up an engine and you should have setup the ECU's engine protection to save you from yourself while you are learning anyway. Plenty of us have tuned their own cars, myself included. We still come here for advice/guidance/new ideas etc.  What have you been doing so far to learn how to tune?
    • Put the ECU's MAP line in your mouth. Blow as hard as you can. You should be able to see about 10 kPa, maybe 15 kPa positive pressure. Suck on it. You should be able to generate a decent vacuum to about the same level also. Note that this is only ~2 psi either way. If the MAP is reading -5 psi all the time, ignition on, engine running or not, driving around or not, then it is severely f**ked. Also, you SHOULD NOT BE DRIVING IT WITHOUT A LOAD REFERENCE. You will break the engine. Badly.
×
×
  • Create New...