Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Well I'll give you one thing, you;re not wasting any time.

I don't think new turbos need a break in period, they either work or they dont. 

Post results when you have them :)

 

What Dan said^^^ 

Turbo's dont need a run in. Just make sure you unplug your coil packs and turn the motor over for a while to push the oil through to the bearings so they don't spin up dry when the car is started ?

  • 2 weeks later...

presetting aem

sard 800cc
1.7 = inj duty 64% (hks 2510)  1bar (34%)
1.2 = inj duty 80% (gtx2860) 1bar (45%)

gtx2860
2500 0.22 
3000 0.36 
3500 0.56 
4000 0.76 
4500 0.9 
5000 1.07 
5500 1.15 
5600 1.2 
6000 1.2 
6000 1.26 

hks 2510
2800 0.3 
3400 0.5 
4000 0.7 
4500 1 
5300 1.5 
6100 1.7

slightly larger lag on sensations
Need a slit gear that reduces the lag
  advance intake and exhaust => more low-RPM power, less high-RPM power

I thought it was by now ancient history , the GTRS was a better replacement for the "GT2540R" and ditto the GTSS (-9) for the "GT2510R" . None of these are perfect but the -9 sounds pretty good for the power it was intended for .

The inaptly named GT2530R is really what's now known as a GT2860R with a specific 63 trim compressor wheel .

GTR twins are a PITA with late GTX compressor wheels because they were designed to work with a port shrouded compressor housing . 

The Holy Grail is probably a single twin scroll EFR and at a guess the 7670 would please most sane users .

Has anyone ever used one on the rare HKS cast low mount 26 manifold ? 

  • Like 1
11 hours ago, discopotato03 said:

I thought it was by now ancient history , the GTRS was a better replacement for the "GT2540R" and ditto the GTSS (-9) for the "GT2510R" . None of these are perfect but the -9 sounds pretty good for the power it was intended for .

The inaptly named GT2530R is really what's now known as a GT2860R with a specific 63 trim compressor wheel .

GTR twins are a PITA with late GTX compressor wheels because they were designed to work with a port shrouded compressor housing . 

The Holy Grail is probably a single twin scroll EFR and at a guess the 7670 would please most sane users .

Has anyone ever used one on the rare HKS cast low mount 26 manifold ? 

Not that I know of, however a lad I know is currently doing an EFR7670 with the .92a/r twin scroll hotside on a tubular twin scroll manifold on an RB26 with basic cam upgrade... was running N1 turbos previously.

The only time I think twins would truly work is if they were both mounted on proper manifolds, externally gated x2, intercooler x2, plenum x2 (1-3 & 4-6). That way there's no turbulence or turbos "fighting" to push into one cooler pipe/core.

By that time, effort and money you're better off with a big fat modern twin scroll single.

-5s! while there maybe some newer tech out there these are proven too work well, 330-370 dependent on health and supporting mods
had them on 34 gtr, no real lag (as reving past 5k was always the case ;)

What is your goal?

The turbo combo had already made the car a little more laggy.

Adding big cams will make that worse, and to be clear 272 cams on a stock 2.6L is a big cam.

Testing shows nothing beats the stock cams for response (248) but that you can gain a bit of midrange without sacrificing too much response with Tomei type R or type A (250 and 256).

Duration is only a small part of it though, lift will help response and bigger lift needs valve springs. Ramp rate will also help it feel not as lazy, but aggressive ramp needs valve springs as well.

I used Kelford 264 after reading lots of reviews about the Tomei having soft ramp rates.

I've got strong torque from just under 4k rpm to redline, but my car has a few other mods to help and I run e85.

I'd suggest you talk to Kelford Cams, Camtech or Clive Cams about your whole setup, current results and your desired goals.

solenoid rsp 100%, ofs 100% (Full boost)

3000, os 12.6, boost 0.3, ign 35
3500, os 12.12, boost 0.5, ign 32
4000, os 12.24 boost 0.7, ign 27
4500, os 11.44 boost 0.84, ign 25
5000, os 11.44, boost 1.01, ign 23
5500, os 11.55, boost 1.17, ign 21
6000, os 11.27, boost 1.26, ign 20
6500, os 10.75, boost 1.29, ign 18
7000, os 10.35, boost 1.25, ign 19
7300, os 9.8, boost 1.33, ign 18

rb26 can not rotate these turbines anymore. What can I do to fix this?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Forgot to include this but this is the mid section of my steering rack that looks like it has a thread/can be turned with that notch mentioned in the post:
    • Hey everyone, Wanted to pick some brains about this issue I'm having with rebuilding my 33 rack (PN is 49001-19U05). All of the tutorials/videos I've seen online are either R34 or S Chassis racks which seem to be pretty straightforward to disassemble but this process doesnt carry over to my rack. Few of the key differences that I've noted The pinion shaft on the other racks bolt on with 3 torx bolts: Whereas my rack bolts on with 2 allen head bolts: These changes are pretty inconsequential but the main difference is how you pull the actual rack out of the housing. The other skyline/s chassis racks can be taken out by tapping the rack out of the body with a socket and it just slides right out. I'm unable to do that with my rack because there's a hard stop at the end that doesn't let the seal/shaft be tapped out. Can also see a difference in the other end of the rack where mine has a notch that looks like you're able to use a big wrench to unthread 2 halves of the rack whereas the other racks are just kinda set in with a punch. My rack: Other racks: TLDR; Wanted to know if anyone has rebuilt this specific model of steering rack for the R33 and if there were any steps to getting it done easier or if I should just give this to a professional to get done. Sorry if this post is a bit messy, first one I've done.
    • I would just put EBC back on the "I would not use their stuff" pile and move on.
    • Can I suggest you try EBC directly again and link them to as many competitor catalogues as you can to show their listing is incorrect, eg https://dba.com.au/product/front-4000-series-hd-brake-rotor-dba42304/ If you have access to an R33 GTST VIN and your VIN, you could also use a Nissan Parts lookup like Amayama to show them the part number is different between 33 GTST and 34 GTT which may get their attention
    • So i got reply from EBC and they just this site where you can clearly see those 296mm fronts on R34 GTT. I send them photos and "quotes" that 296mm are not for 34 GTT and they are too small. But it will be very hard to return them cuz nobody here knows 100% and they just copy those EBC catalogue :-D https://ebcbrakesdirect.com/automotive/nissan/skyline-r34
×
×
  • Create New...