Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Lots of negative here, if you don't like a sequential then fine but plenty of race pros prefer them and when watching in car videos you can see why. Depending on driver skill then the syncros will  be a serviceable item just like the dogs are in a dog box. 

Phil in the mighty 280ZX with a Quaife sequential dog box.

 

Edited by 260DET

What has a H pattern got anything to do with it, all depends on the driver. With a dog box the shifts have to be hard and fast as the video above showed, with a syncro box it's easier on the syncros if the shift is made a bit slower which can be done using that sequential conversion. Drivers bang through shifts on a H pattern box all the time, the syncros don't care which pattern the shifter is.

Too much bandwagoning and not enough thinking going on here.

Edited by 260DET
  • Like 2

Either way you have to wait for the synchro’s.... well to match speed.

Sick. So you have a mad looking shifter that goes backwards and forwards.... slowly. 

You cant set up a fancy nob to ignition cut for a quick change like a real sequential box.... so what’s the point. Well I suppose you could but the shift won’t be any quicker because of the synchro’s. *ignition cut..... cutting..... cutting...sweet they’re matched now”. To do that you’ll need a fancy nob ($1000-$1600 depending on what one you choose) and an ECU that can do that so that rules out a Power FC.

“Farrrrkk, you got a sequential bro?”

”Nah man, still a factory box but it looks like I do. Sick hey!. Can you like my car on Insta and Facetube?”

?.

Take the money and put something decent on the car! It’s junk and belongs in the dumpster!

 

Sequential would be rubbish in traffic but for a  bit of track time for someone who likes a sequential this Bremer shifter makes a lot of sense. A dog box sequential is something else again, in outlay and in use, it certainly would be more awkward to use in traffic. Don't know about Nissan boxes but for Tremecs there are shift enhancements available including carbon fibre syncro rings so box life with them should be good. 

There is nothing fake here, it's an option which would make sense for some.

 

 

17 hours ago, mlracing said:

Ikeya Formula have been doing this for years. Presumably you still need to use the clutch like you do with the Ikeya one

and they're shit.. that sequential shifter is also shit.. you forget to clutch and boom!

A proper sequential box, with strain gauge to cut ignition/rpm and/or shut your TB via DBW is the only way.

You can't just throw loads of RPM and torque in between gears, even DSG cuts torque via a torque management strategy - thus the farts and pops.

  • Haha 1

Just because you have a sequential shift like this one does not mean the car has to be driven like it's a big dollar race box, it can be shifted at the same speed as usual. Sure shifting will require a bit of learning but so does double declutching  which plenty of drivers can't do well yet still manage to do decent times without wrecking gearboxes. A strain gauge setup could be fitted but I don't think that anyone is claiming  that for a full on race use this is the best shifter.

Yet to see any coherent argument that this sequential would not suit someone who particularly wants a sequential shift but realises this one's limitations. Because it will work within those limitations.

Sequential shift, but you still need to use the clutch and make sure you lift off the accelerator... quite pointless and being Nissan, the FS5W30A gearset, they don't like to be shifted fast and at super high RPM.

All these negative comments I could understand if you were going from an actual sequential gearbox with all the bells and whistes, to a standard box with this kit on it.

Anyone who is only used to the ol' H-pattern on the track is still going to have clutch on accel off muscle memory and an idea of their rev range, unless they are literally retarded.

The benefits I can see are: 

  • the shifter location, i.e. closer to the steering wheel for those who aren't sick leb dream boats that drive with one hand on the gearknob at all times for that phallic sensation.
  • reinforces the practice of downshifting through the gears, rather than say from 4 to 2,
  • minimises the memory requirement of the current gear, especially when you're mixing it up, trying 2nd instead of 3rd at a slower corner to keep the revs up for example, and the gearknob is some 10 to 15cm south west of where you thought it was

of course all this still requires the driver to be actively thinking about what they're doing, which to be quite honest, that's literally your one job while driving, is to think about driving.

So for my shitty track car worth <$5k am I going to spend $20+k on a sequential? hell no, $1.5k on a lever? much more likely

  • 5 years later...

Hi all, thread revamp 

Im looking to buy one of the new Speedtek dog gearsets (i know the history) and was wondering if one of the sequential conversions above would work, noting the concerns re normal syncros.

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hope you aren't too sore after that one, might take a day or 2 to notice yet and I guess it is a loooooong drive home. On the bright side, tube frame front end is a thing at superlap, right?
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/p/18rmVb1SKB/ 
    • The chart of front pressure to rear pressure (with one being on the x axis and the other being on the y axis) is not a straight line on a typical proportioning valve. At lower pressures there is a straight line with one slope, and at higher pressures that changes to a lower slope. That creates a bend in the line at that pressure, called the knee point. If you do not change the proportionng as the pressure gets higher, you will suffer excessive pressure (at one end of the car or the other, depending on which way you look at the proportioning action) and then get lockups at that end. The HFM BM57, from my memory of previous discussions, is based on the BM57 from a different car (to a Skyline), with a different requirement for the location of the knee point and the distribution of pressure front to rear, and so is not a good choice for an upgrade on a Skyline. Here's a couple of links to some old posts, one from here, one from elsewhere. A lot of it pertains to adjustable prop valves, but the idea is the same. There are plenty of discussions on here about this issue from al the many years of people wanting a cheap/accessible option. https://grassrootsmotorsports.com/forum/grm/learn-me-brake-proportioning-valves/236880/page1/ https://grassrootsmotorsports.com/forum/grm/learn-me-brake-proportioning-valves/236880/page1/  
    • Yeah dunno why johhny posted that here with no context, just post on FB/insta bro where he put it up?  Laine had an off at T4 during Thurs prac, he's ok, car is less than perfect, they are done for the weekend, he can fill in the rest. Bando also binned it like 100m up the road.   
    • I feel there must have been a FB/insta post and the weekend did not start well at all I hope everyone is all okay
×
×
  • Create New...