Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey, as usual, I’ve tried looking for answers on my specific problem, but haven’t found one, yet. 
 

I’ve had my R32 for just over 7 months and it has terrible fuel economy. My tank is nearly empty after only about 170km. When I first got the car, it had misfires; and I did everything I could to fix any issue that would have affected my fuel economy, except for buying new fuel injectors.
 

My car runs rich. I suspected a fuel leak or an exhaust leak somewhere, but my mechanic assured me my car was fine. I even got a new tune for better fuel-to-air ratio and I am still having to fill up everyone 150-175km. Also, my fuel gauge fluctuates. 
 

I’m stumped. 

47CDD755-8014-4095-B9AC-91BAAE461DD9.jpeg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/479767-r32-gt-r-fuel-economy/
Share on other sites

A few things, it's really hard to use KM per 'tank' as a measure of economy. No one runs the tank to completely empty then fills up again so the number is subjective. Please give us the L per 100 KM figure. 

You mention you got your car tuned for a better AFR, what ECU and mods do you have? 

Have you fixed the misfire? 

What do you mean your fuel gauge fluctuates?

As above you need to be a bit more scientific. Clearly you can't rely on your fuel gauge so you need to fill your tank to the top, record the km and then next time you fill it calculate the litres per 100km. What are all the things you did to improve economy? New spark plugs and coils? Check brakes for binding? Check timing?  Did the mechanic put an AFR meter on and if so what were the numbers (or do you have a wide band installed)?

On 2/16/2020 at 12:23 AM, blind_elk said:

Worst thing for fuel economy in a GT-R is the enormous lump of lead at the end of your right leg. Lighten it off a bit. No need to be red-lining from every set of traffic lights.

Has anyone actually done a BSFC map of the RB26? I'm sure it's going to be ugly but curious to know what the ideal operating points are.

My Stagea with an RB30 and GT3540 would do 8-9 L/100km on a trip. Round town it would vary from 12 to 14L /100 depending on where I was going and how I was driving. RBs are not for economy runs!

  • 1 year later...

Sorry for the super late response. A lot of things went wrong with the car all at once and had to make changes/upgrades to it. Since then, I have upgrades to a high-flow Nismo fuel pump, NZEFI 1000cc injectors, GT2860r-5 twins, stock rail and FPR, R35 Coils and Haltech Platinum Pro ECU.

The car has been my daily for the last four months, so I can’t afford to do pulls and risk something breaking. Around the time of this post, I had a Djetro Apexi ECU, and when I installed the R35 coils and 1000cc injectors, I had decently good fuel economy. But when I changed to the Haltech ECU, my fuel economy went downhill. I’ve been tuning the basemap to my application, but no matter what I tinker with, I can’t improve fuel economy. I’ve tuned the injector flow rates, injector dead times, dwell times, target AFR, base fuel map, coolant temp corrections, Idle duty cycle, transient throttle (throttle pump). My wideband reads 14.2 at idle and 13.8-14.1 cruising (2000-3000rpm). I get constant rich bank warnings while idling at 14.2 AFR. It’s probably a timing issue but I don’t understand that kind of stuff enough to be tuning it, so I’m not touching that. 
 

I understand that GTRs are not the most economical cars, but I’m pretty sure mine is way below any of your guys’ cars. That’s why I’m concerned. Everyone here seems to average 14L/100km, but I burn about, what seems like, 14L/25-50km. 

Even 14 L/100km is pretty awful, I get about 11L/100km, 9.5-10 L/100km should be achievable purely doing motorway driving. I'm pretty sure your problem is your ECU tune. You should be able to command lambda 1 and get lambda 1, it's really that simple. If it isn't happening something is wrong with the modeling of your engine in the tune. Feel free to post some logs from idle/cruise.

I attached a datalog from a couple nights ago. If you have the haltech ECU manager and you can view it, let me know what you see. I'm not experienced in the tuning scene. I'm learning as I go. There are a couple of lean spots from rough take-offs at stop lights. You'll probably see that.  

Usual Route Data Log - Haltech Plat Pro - BNR32 GTR.csv

Edited by BourneToLive
On 12/31/2021 at 11:19 PM, BourneToLive said:

I attached a datalog from a couple nights ago. If you have the haltech ECU manager and you can view it, let me know what you see. I'm not experienced in the tuning scene. I'm learning as I go. There are a couple of lean spots from rough take-offs at stop lights. You'll probably see that.  

Usual Route Data Log - Haltech Plat Pro - BNR32 GTR.csv 2.59 MB · 1 download

I'm not going to pretend I'm some expert here and without your ECU map in addition to the logs it's hard to figure out exactly what the ECU is "thinking" when certain things occur. At 4:09 in this log I think what I'm seeing is bad transient throttle mapping, there's a sharp lean-out followed by a sudden rush of fuel too late as it enriches. That is purely in the synchronous fuel enrichment tables. The one time you do a bit of a pull to 3500 RPM at 7:53 in the log goes pretty rich, 0.8 lambda when it commands 0.91 lambda. I'm not sure if it should be that rich and it goes very rich too, seemingly just from the 23-26 percent TPS percent change. I'm also not sure why the target AFR is 0.97 lambda almost everywhere. If you want lambda 1 you should be setting that in the target AFR tables. Also I think your after-start enrichment when the coolant temp is warm seems really extreme, you're at like 0.75 lambda at idle which is just a ton of fuel to be dumping for a warm start. I think this picture sums up the issue pretty well, I think:

image.thumb.png.45b79bc01cb739ce8a557707e4d7dc4a.png

Also, why is ignition timing -27 degrees at 6:20? Something seems broken there, likely an electrical fault. Your ignition timing maybe looks fine, I have the OEM timing and fuel tables but it's really hard to translate it to a kPa load, I'd need to know the actual cylinder filling based upon that load which is not truly linear. There might be a bit more timing in there but without more testing it's kind of hard to say.

The other thing is that I notice you don't have DFCO enabled. Once you get map development figured out I would start using it so your fuel economy gets a lot better. Honestly speaking your situation is one I'm hoping to avoid in my own tuning, my current plan is to use MAF-based tuning in Haltech's ECU tuning setup to hopefully be able to replicate the OEM maps so the car is driving properly from the start and I can go from there. If you still have the MAF sensors and your setup is mostly OEM then I might be able to help you get going. I'm not a professional tuner though, strong emphasis on this basically being "blind leading the blind". I can only help with getting your base map into a better place, it's no replacement for actually getting a dyno tune to optimize ignition timing/AFR at higher RPMs. The big unknown I need to figure out myself is transients, with MAFs it's much harder compared to the MAP/TPS blend you see in the Haltech base map.

On 1/3/2022 at 7:12 PM, joshuaho96 said:

I'm not going to pretend I'm some expert here and without your ECU map in addition to the logs it's hard to figure out exactly what the ECU is "thinking" when certain things occur. At 4:09 in this log I think what I'm seeing is bad transient throttle mapping, there's a sharp lean-out followed by a sudden rush of fuel too late as it enriches. That is purely in the synchronous fuel enrichment tables. The one time you do a bit of a pull to 3500 RPM at 7:53 in the log goes pretty rich, 0.8 lambda when it commands 0.91 lambda. I'm not sure if it should be that rich and it goes very rich too, seemingly just from the 23-26 percent TPS percent change. I'm also not sure why the target AFR is 0.97 lambda almost everywhere. If you want lambda 1 you should be setting that in the target AFR tables. Also I think your after-start enrichment when the coolant temp is warm seems really extreme, you're at like 0.75 lambda at idle which is just a ton of fuel to be dumping for a warm start. I think this picture sums up the issue pretty well, I think:

image.thumb.png.45b79bc01cb739ce8a557707e4d7dc4a.png

Also, why is ignition timing -27 degrees at 6:20? Something seems broken there, likely an electrical fault. Your ignition timing maybe looks fine, I have the OEM timing and fuel tables but it's really hard to translate it to a kPa load, I'd need to know the actual cylinder filling based upon that load which is not truly linear. There might be a bit more timing in there but without more testing it's kind of hard to say.

The other thing is that I notice you don't have DFCO enabled. Once you get map development figured out I would start using it so your fuel economy gets a lot better. Honestly speaking your situation is one I'm hoping to avoid in my own tuning, my current plan is to use MAF-based tuning in Haltech's ECU tuning setup to hopefully be able to replicate the OEM maps so the car is driving properly from the start and I can go from there. If you still have the MAF sensors and your setup is mostly OEM then I might be able to help you get going. I'm not a professional tuner though, strong emphasis on this basically being "blind leading the blind". I can only help with getting your base map into a better place, it's no replacement for actually getting a dyno tune to optimize ignition timing/AFR at higher RPMs. The big unknown I need to figure out myself is transients, with MAFs it's much harder compared to the MAP/TPS blend you see in the Haltech base map.

Thanks for looking at the log. So, if you want, I can send you the map I’m using. It’s a Haltech base map that I’ve been tuning. For the rich post-start when warm, that’s the setting that doesn’t make my AFR go extremely lean. It wasn’t that rich originally, but my AFR was at 20+. Even with the current post start settings, it goes to 15.5 AFR. This is only on warm starts. 
 

For transient throttle, I’m still messing with that. I’ll give DFCO a try. A lot of the settings here I haven’t messed with because I don’t understand them. I deleted the MAFs because they were on the way out and it was cheaper to use a MAP sensor than buy new MAFs. As for the timing, I have no clue. I haven’t touched that part of the map. Lol 

Also, I try keeping my idle AFR at 14.2 and cruise at 14.1. 

 

Edited by BourneToLive
On 1/3/2022 at 3:07 AM, BourneToLive said:

Thanks for looking at the log. So, if you want, I can send you the map I’m using. It’s a Haltech base map that I’ve been tuning. For the rich post-start when warm, that’s the setting that doesn’t make my AFR go extremely lean. It wasn’t that rich originally, but my AFR was at 20+. Even with the current post start settings, it goes to 15.5 AFR. This is only on warm starts. 
 

For transient throttle, I’m still messing with that. I’ll give DFCO a try. A lot of the settings here I haven’t messed with because I don’t understand them. I deleted the MAFs because they were on the way out and it was cheaper to use a MAP sensor than buy new MAFs. As for the timing, I have no clue. I haven’t touched that part of the map. Lol 

Also, I try keeping my idle AFR at 14.2 and cruise at 14.1. 

 

If you have a catalytic converter you're going to melt it if you keep running it rich like that. Also you're just wasting fuel for no real reason. The factory ECU idles a touch lean I believe and cruises at lambda 1 until you hit boost.

On 04/01/2022 at 6:30 AM, joshuaho96 said:

If you have a catalytic converter you're going to melt it if you keep running it rich like that

On the contrary, running rich actually cools everything down.

 

I don’t use a cat. I have a test pipe with my wideband O2 sensor on it and I disabled my OEM narrowband sensors that are on the turbo outlet pipes. Funny thing that happened recently, I did the same thing with my MAFs in Haltech’s ECU Manager, but I left them plugged it up until three days ago. When I unplugged them, I put about 4000yen worth of high octane gas (65AUD), and it seemed to have been the problem to my fuel economy issue after the new ECU install. After three days, I’ve driven about 60km on it and my fuel gauge moved only about a millimeter or two. I left my OEM sensors plugged in as well after disabling them. I wonder if that’s messing with my AFR readings. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • So, that is it! It is a pretty expensive process with the ATF costing 50-100 per 5 litres, and a mechanic will probably charge plenty because they don't want to do it. Still, considering how dirty my fluid was at 120,000klm I think it would be worth doing more like every 80,000 to keep the trans happy, they are very expensive to replace. The job is not that hard if you have the specialist tools so you can save a bit of money and do it yourself!
    • OK, onto filling. So I don't really have any pics, but will describe the process as best I can. The USDM workshop manual also covers it from TM-285 onwards. First, make sure the drain plug (17mm) is snug. Not too tight yet because it is coming off again. Note it does have a copper washer that you could replace or anneal (heat up with a blow torch) to seal nicely. Remove the fill plug, which has an inhex (I think it was 6mm but didn't check). Then, screw in the fill fitting, making sure it has a suitable o-ring (mine came without but I think it is meant to be supplied). It is important that you only screw it in hand tight. I didn't get a good pic of it, but the fill plug leads to a tube about 70mm long inside the transmission. This sets the factory level for fluid in the trans (above the join line for the pan!) and will take about 3l to fill. You then need to connect your fluid pump to the fitting via a hose, and pump in whatever amount of fluid you removed (maybe 3 litres, in my case 7 litres). If you put in more than 3l, it will spill out when you remove the fitting, so do quickly and with a drain pan underneath. Once you have pumped in the required amount of clean ATF, you start the engine and run it for 3 minutes to let the fluid circulate. Don't run it longer and if possible check the fluid temp is under 40oC (Ecutek shows Auto Trans Fluid temp now, or you could use an infrared temp gun on the bottom of the pan). The manual stresses the bit about fluid temperature because it expands when hot an might result in an underfil. So from here, the factory manual says to do the "spill and fill" again, and I did. That is, put an oil pan under the drain plug and undo it with a 17mm spanner, then watch your expensive fluid fall back out again, you should get about 3 litres.  Then, put the drain plug back in, pump 3 litres back in through the fill plug with the fitting and pump, disconnect the fill fitting and replace the fill plug, start the car and run for another 3 minutes (making sure the temp is still under 40oC). The manual then asks for a 3rd "spill and fill" just like above. I also did that and so had put 13l in by now.  This time they want you to keep the engine running and run the transmission through R and D (I hope the wheels are still off the ground!) for a while, and allow the trans temp to get to 40oC, then engine off. Finally, back under the car and undo the fill plug to let the overfill drain out; it will stop running when fluid is at the top of the levelling tube. According to the factory, that is job done! Post that, I reconnected the fill fitting and pumped in an extra 0.5l. AMS says 1.5l overfill is safe, but I started with less to see how it goes, I will add another 1.0 litres later if I'm still not happy with the hot shifts.
    • OK, so regardless of whether you did Step 1 - Spill Step 2 - Trans pan removal Step 3 - TCM removal we are on to the clean and refill. First, have a good look at the oil pan. While you might see dirty oil and some carbony build up (I did), what you don't want to see is any metal particles on the magnets, or sparkles in the oil (thankfully not). Give it all a good clean, particularly the magnets, and put the new gasket on if you have one (or, just cross your fingers) Replacement of the Valve body (if you removed it) is the "reverse of assembly". Thread the electrical socket back up through the trans case, hold the valve body up and put in the bolts you removed, with the correct lengths in the correct locations Torque for the bolts in 8Nm only so I hope you have that torque wrench handy (it feels really loose). Plug the output speed sensor back in and clip the wiring into the 2 clips, replace the spring clip on the TCM socket and plug it back into the car loom. For the pan, the workshop manual states the following order: Again, the torque is 8Nm only.
    • One other thing to mention from my car before we reassemble and refill. Per that earlier diagram,   There should be 2x B length (40mm) and 6x C length (54mm). So I had incorrectly removed one extra bolt, which I assume was 40mm, but even so I have 4x B and 5x C.  Either, the factory made an assembly error (very unlikely), or someone had been in there before me. I vote for the latter because the TCM part number doesn't match my build date, I suspect the TCM was changed under warranty. This indeed led to much unbolting, rebolting, checking, measuring and swearing under the car.... In the end I left out 1x B bolt and put in a 54mm M6 bolt I already had to make sure it was all correct
    • A couple of notes about the TCM. Firstly, it is integrated into the valve body. If you need to replace the TCM for any reason you are following the procedure above The seppos say these fail all the time. I haven't seen or heard of one on here or locally, but that doesn't mean it can't happen. Finally, Ecutek are now offering tuning for the 7 speed TCM. It is basically like ECU tuning in that you have to buy a license for the computer, and then known parameters can be reset. This is all very new and at the moment they are focussing on more aggressive gear holding in sports or sports+ mode, 2 gear launches for drag racing etc. It doesn't seem to affect shift speed like you can on some transmissions. Importantly for me, by having controllable shift points you can now raise the shift point as well as the ECU rev limit, together allowing it to rev a little higher when that is useful. In manual mode, my car shifts up automatically regardless of what I do which is good (because I don't have to worry about it) but bad (because I can't choose to rev a little higher when convenient).  TCMs can only be tuned from late 2016 onwards, and mine is apparently not one of those although the car build date was August 2016 (presumably a batch of ADM cars were done together, so this will probably be the situation for most ADM cars). No idea about JDM cars, and I'm looking into importing a later model valve body I can swap in. This is the top of my TCM A couple of numbers but no part number. Amayama can't find my specific car but it does say the following for Asia-RHD (interestingly, all out of stock....): So it looks like programable TCM are probably post September 2018 for "Asia RHD". When I read my part number out from Ecutek it was 31705-75X6D which did not match Amayama for my build date (Aug-2016)
×
×
  • Create New...