Jump to content
SAU Community

Another BK R32 GTR money pit...


BK
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hi mate, my point was more that reluctors are generally very reliable; probably more than hall sensors particularly with high tooth counts. With that in mind I would suggest that your issue is likely to be wiring/setup based rather than a fault with the reluctor itself.

As rpm/triggers increase so does the amplitude of the waveform from the reluctor but as you've pointed out the voltages can be very low at cranking RPM. I think once you run a ref/sync trace on it you'll know what the problem is and how to address it.

With respect to tooth counts on crank triggers, I would prefer to run a missing tooth configuration if I'm spending the money anyway so I wasn't happy with the standard 12 tooth from Ross. They make nice gear though, I've got their dry sump setup and it's very well made.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Komdotkom said:

Hi mate, my point was more that reluctors are generally very reliable; probably more than hall sensors particularly with high tooth counts. With that in mind I would suggest that your issue is likely to be wiring/setup based rather than a fault with the reluctor itself.

As rpm/triggers increase so does the amplitude of the waveform from the reluctor but as you've pointed out the voltages can be very low at cranking RPM. I think once you run a ref/sync trace on it you'll know what the problem is and how to address it.

With respect to tooth counts on crank triggers, I would prefer to run a missing tooth configuration if I'm spending the money anyway so I wasn't happy with the standard 12 tooth from Ross. They make nice gear though, I've got their dry sump setup and it's very well made.

Yeah I completely agree with everything, but I will reinforce reluctors definitely require very small sensor to tooth height gaps ideally well under 0.5mm. Ross do also have the 36-2 missing tooth count versions which work with hall effect for more resolution over the 12t, but yeah if you want to run something like a 60 tooth a reluctor seems to be the only option there as you mentioned. For the single tooth cam home signal though a reluctor really offers no advantages over a hall effect.

On another note I think I made progress last night with the cam trigger setup though. I will elaborate later, but it seems to be more related overfuelling on cranking at over 70c.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

Maybe just for the sake of it, update your firmware.

I noticed you're using not the latest firmware.

On the Nexus 3 firmware and NSP software now. Can you post your fuel prime pulse and fuel cranking tables for me ? I think this thing has been massively over fuelling on crank at over 70c as I've had to dramatically reduce both of the tables, more so than I would expect to be normal.

In the wiring department the ground has been changed back to the cas pin 4 wire and signal ground B14 pin. The signal + was changed to cas pin 2 wire and terminated at B1 Trigger + too just to rule out the signal + wire fault.

I'm really starting to think I haven't been chasing an electrical signal fault at all and the overfuelling at 70c + has been stalling the engine creating inconsistent cranking in turn upsetting the low cranking voltage signal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

Still needs work, but on a 15 degree day it starts by the 2nd crank

image.thumb.png.0d2efd263022e20311bd8fa236beaa08.png

image.thumb.png.24bcca39ead409fe2cb952fd4e9b1905.png

image.thumb.png.4849810ee616f838e36fc37bbd804926.png

 

Cheers dude. Yeah that looks a little closer to my blue 32 sort of coolant temp vs fuel decrease, but on this car with the cranking and prime pulse I'm having to drop this shit down into the 30 - 40% region after 70c to not flood the engine. At 80% even it seems to start to stall the engine cranking speed. It seems like a fairly dramitic reduction to me to have to do. Haven't really needed to touch post start as once the engine fires all is well.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

How is your base fuel map too? I've been told that needs to be dialled in properly as well (a bit hard trying to dial in fuel for a motor that's not running).

This is my base fuel table, noting that I didn't not use a ethanol 4th dimension and relying on the calculations by the Haltech's inbuilt flex fuel table.

Ignore the big dip around the idle area, I enabled VCT from idle and also pulled out heaps of timing to give it a silly brap idle lolololol.

image.thumb.png.9352db3cd96e6ad01fcd20d75b7ca908.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

How is your base fuel map too? I've been told that needs to be dialled in properly as well (a bit hard trying to dial in fuel for a motor that's not running).

This is my base fuel table, noting that I didn't not use a ethanol 4th dimension and relying on the calculations by the Haltech's inbuilt flex fuel table.

Ignore the big dip around the idle area, I enabled VCT from idle and also pulled out heaps of timing to give it a silly brap idle lolololol.

image.thumb.png.9352db3cd96e6ad01fcd20d75b7ca908.png

Been letting the ltft sort out the low load low rpm stuff and applying as necessary. Base fuel map though should have nothing to do with fuel at cranking as that's what the prime pulse and cranking tables are supposed to be for. They are not correction tables - they are the cranking fuel references.

Are you finding the base table affecting cranking fuel ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, BK said:

Been letting the ltft sort out the low load low rpm stuff and applying as necessary. Base fuel map though should have nothing to do with fuel at cranking as that's what the prime pulse and cranking tables are supposed to be for. They are not correction tables - they are the cranking fuel references.

I thought this too, until I read this:

https://www.hpacademy.com/technical-articles/cold-starting/

Scroll down a bit to the Elite 2500 screenshots.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Base fuel has to be right.
All cranking, IAT, ECT are all corrections or multipliers of the base fuel map. This goes for Ignition and boost tables too 

I thought with my trigger kit there was issues on cold start/cranking rpm but was Cranking and Prime fuel tables being off between 10-30C
 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, robbo_rb180 said:

Base fuel has to be right.
All cranking, IAT, ECT are all corrections or multipliers of the base fuel map. This goes for Ignition and boost tables too 

I thought with my trigger kit there was issues on cold start/cranking rpm but was Cranking and Prime fuel tables being off between 10-30C
 

Yeah well mines been the other way around with off values at 70+, no dramas cold.The strangest shit is happening here right now on the NSP, the Nexus 3.7.1 firmware has changed everything. I'm finding me going back to nearly the same starting point values on cranking, pulse prime and base fuel map when on the older software. Msybe it has been a firmware problem all along which was screwing with my hot cranking values

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • This morning I carefully reinstalled the manifold and started looking at a couple of things I need to do.  Heat wrap arrived sometime today so I popped into the shed with the missus dishwashing gloves and started wrapping the first half of the dump and the screamer/plumb back.  Once I do the second half I'll be able to final fit the turbo and exhaust up.  Also pulled the harness out today and started terminating it at the ECU end. A connector is done, just need to run the remaining wires that arent in the harness - 12v, gnd and couple I/O
    • A31 is pretty much the same thing without HiAIDS I mean CAS, no improvement lol. Not to late to send it.
    • Thanks for all the replies! I also wanted to ask if wheels that were fitted on Ford Falcons would fit the 350GTs as well? In the area I'm at there aren't that many options for secondhand wheels and new ones here are way out of my budget. From what I've seen, most of the wheels that are available that were fitted on Ford Falcons have an offset of +33 to +36, with a centre bore of 70.5mm whereas the stock 350GT's ones are 66mm, can't seem to find any hubcentric rings that fit that difference though. 
    • 215/45/18 tyres are probably a little on the low side compared to the factory tyre, it should be closer to a 245/45/19, which will get you about an extra 11mm of height, and should make you speedo read a bit closer to reality. 245/45/19s will be a bit too far the other way and you risk a speeding ticket as your speedo might read slower than your actual speed.  245/40/19s would be correct if you are going to 19in rims, they will give you a similar total diameter to the 245/45/18 tyres.  
    • That's something I forgot to put in my list. The aggressive anti-squat in R32 is a f**king menace. I still need to decide if I'm going to drag the subframe out of my car and weld in the GKTech corrector kit. The main reason to dither is the need to switch to spherical joints in the lower arm to account for the twist induced in the rear pivot caused by lowering the front pivot. And yes...we do put better subframes in R32s, and I wish I'd gotten an S14 one instead of an A31 when I did the "take off and nuke it from orbit" HICAS delete all those years ago.
×
×
  • Create New...