Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I drive mine weekly(when its working haha) and sometimes to work. The loud car in the carpark is already a thing, idling it would be the next amusement for people. Also who wants to stay at work longer than they have to. 

 

*off to understand oil pre-heaters ....google time. 

On 23/7/2022 at 12:57 PM, joshuaho96 said:

I can't imagine idling a car for 10 minutes any time I want to go somewhere but I'm not really the target audience for a billet block anyways.

It’s not that hard to waste 10 minutes. Start the car, open the garage, move the car that’s in front of it, remove bollards, check oil temperature gauge and you’ll be pretty close 

Sooooo I re-watched this video and I have questions ....

 

On a second watch this really does look like a video beat up of N1 and sales pitch for braces.

 

The N1 block is claimed (my understanding)

>Have 1mm thicker deck - Confirmed in video

>Have higher Nickel content ... not addressed

>Be stronger around cylinder 3 and 4 - not addressed other than visual inspection 

>Have modified internal water and oil passages for better flow - not addressed other than visual inspection

 

The video did claim it was less hard, which I thought would suggest it has nickel, as nickel is less hard than cast steel ?

Does hardness really stop a block cracking ?  or is metallurgy a thing here ?

I would of thought a hardness test of a billet block would be 30% less than a cast ?

 

Also not aware that N1 was ever supposed to be thicker cylinder walls, so that is expected to be the same.

 

THOUGHTS ???

 

 

 

On 7/26/2022 at 2:53 PM, Butters said:

The video did claim it was less hard, which I thought would suggest it has nickel, as nickel is less hard than cast steel ?

Hardness is really not an indicator of compressive or tensile strength. It is somewhat inversely proportional to toughness in that harder materials are usually more brittle. This is one of the key complaints I have with the idea of hardness testing cast iron blocks to determine how "good" they are.

Further, just because there is a different proportion of a given element in a cast iron (yes, iron, not steel) doesn't necessarily mean that any of the mechanical properties of the resulting cast iron will scale up and down in the same direction as the mechanical properties of the element. One of the whole points of alloys is that the alloying elements often to interesting and unexpected things when combined into the crystal matrix. Nevertheless, pure metallic nickel is about 1000 Brinell and typical grey cast irons are about 250 Brinell. So, Ni is not softer than cast iron. Addition of nickel can close on double the hardness of cast irons - if hardness is what you are after. The problem is that nickel is also used to increase high temperature resistance of cast irons, and when you do so, it tends to decrease the hardness. So ask yourself....why would Nissan add more Ni to the cast iron spec for the N1 block?

I would suggest that hardness is not necessarily the most desirable property of a cast iron in an engine block application. Tensile strength and toughness would be higher on the list. Tensile strength only inasmuch as it contributes to the stiffness of the finished casting. The properties relating to castability (how it flows, etc) would likely also be higher. Vibration resistance is an inherent property of cast iron that you would not likely choose to reduce.

On 7/26/2022 at 2:53 PM, Butters said:

I would of thought a hardness test of a billet block would be 30% less than a cast ?

Well, with a billet block being made from aluminium alloys, like 6061, which is only around 100 Brinell. So....

On 7/26/2022 at 1:23 PM, Butters said:

Sooooo I re-watched this video and I have questions ....

 

On a second watch this really does look like a video beat up of N1 and sales pitch for braces.

 

The N1 block is claimed (my understanding)

>Have 1mm thicker deck - Confirmed in video

>Have higher Nickel content ... not addressed

>Be stronger around cylinder 3 and 4 - not addressed other than visual inspection 

>Have modified internal water and oil passages for better flow - not addressed other than visual inspection

 

The video did claim it was less hard, which I thought would suggest it has nickel, as nickel is less hard than cast steel ?

Does hardness really stop a block cracking ?  or is metallurgy a thing here ?

I would of thought a hardness test of a billet block would be 30% less than a cast ?

 

Also not aware that N1 was ever supposed to be thicker cylinder walls, so that is expected to be the same.

 

THOUGHTS ???

 

 

 

At one point Mr Dodge made a comment on his page saying that the N1 blocks are worst than 05U's. 

I asked an open question simply from curiosity and wanting to learn, for every handful of N1's or 05U's how many of them crack he got angry and messaged me in a split second demanding I don't ask baited questions 

The N1 block was made for cars competing in the N1 Endurance racing series, with a budget to go top level racing so surely some thought went into it regarding what material to use or input of someone clued up. 

If you goto a place that has build hundreds of 26's and you want high power likely they spec an N1 block.   

There are a few guys who have had a PRP brace on 05U's and ended up with exterior cracks, how well the brace helps a brand new 05U block though, perhaps there's some merit to it.  When I went to build my engine, given an 05U $3500 plus $1500 Brace plus machining plus shop labour, fitting your not really too far off a N1 block price.  

 

Edited by RB335
  • Like 1

Yes @GTSBoy iron, sorry not sure what was going on in my brain.  Thanks for your reply, good info. 

I thought iron was 4.5 on Mohs and Nickel 4, making it slightly less hard. Appreciate that is considered a less reliable way of measuring hardness. 

On 7/26/2022 at 9:26 PM, khezz said:

The main lesson in that video is that RB30 is king. $500 a through. Stronger, harder, stiffer and there is no replacement for displacement. 

Yes there is ! Its called money.

I used to think that the "there is no replacement for displacement" was a groovy statement in the day but then I got exposed to the F1 Honda engines of the mid to late 80s.

Changed the way I thought a lot !

  • Like 1
On 27/7/2022 at 4:44 AM, PLYNX said:

Yes there is ! Its called money.

I used to think that the "there is no replacement for displacement" was a groovy statement in the day but then I got exposed to the F1 Honda engines of the mid to late 80s.

Changed the way I thought a lot !

Love those old F1 videos. Those drivers had balls. 
 

displacement is still king. All 3 of the 6 second gtrs in Australia use 3.2l engines not 2.6l

Don’t know about money. It’s just easier with a 3.2. Look at top fuellers. They use the biggest displacement allowed. No shortage of cash there or brains. But it’s just easier with a bigger motor. 

  • 6 months later...

So this was a fun watch.

Seems a lot of value in an N1 block over a standard, specially for the power levels that are not going to split bores(1200 + ?) .

It does make you really question the value of a brace.

 

 

He stated the bores are still the problem in the n1 block, it’s the deck and the cracking above the turbo oil feed that’s been improved, also the brace is to stop the main girdle from walking 

23 minutes ago, r32-25t said:

He stated the bores are still the problem in the n1 block, it’s the deck and the cracking above the turbo oil feed that’s been improved, also the brace is to stop the main girdle from walking 

He has stated in previous video that the brace was built for 4wd adaptions. Then they noticed blocks crack less. Yes walk is it's feature but also this from the PRP site. 

"Aftermarket diffs crack blocks! it’s a fact, the Platinum Block brace will not only stop block twist, but stops the diff snapping the block under load, energy is dissipated through your 40mm thick integrated and webbed brace, blocks cracking and snapping become a thing of the past!"

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I'd be very surprised if you can buy new OEM mats. But if you can, I want some too!  Do you have links to the variations you found? Also, where are you located? I found that Nengun is happy to list items to purchase but when you do buy them you'll get an email that it's actually discontinued. As far as I know the variations in floor mats are different colour schemes as well as automatic and manual having a slightly different shape. The automatic ones fit into a manual car without issues, but I think you'd have trouble fitting the other way around. I have photos that show the shape difference if you care. FWIW I bought sets of used floor mats in decent condition at yahoo auctions.
    • Hi 🙋‍♂️. Just bought my Unicorn but the interior need some minor work so it would match my expectations ;). I noticed it is hard to get used oem floor mats in good condition so i started to dig if there's any chance to buy set of new ones. I found two websites - nengun and amayama and it looks like one can still buy factory new floor mats in Japan, but thers a small issue. Some mats (i assume genuine, oem ones) are marked as G4900 and these are "discontinued". The ones you can buy are marked as G4911 but i have no idea if these are also oem, made by other producer or some lower quality replacements that looks entirely different. Can anyone help? 😃  P.s. there is also some strange indication - 0V005, 0V015 and 0V505. Any idea what does it mean? Would appreciate any help with this 🙏
    • Hi, Marek here 🙋‍♂️. I finally fulfilled my longtime dream - recently bought Stagea and now waiting for it to arrive in Poland. There's only few of these in my country, and one of the owners  recommended mi this forum as a source of all the info i'd need since now i own one  so here i am.  
    • Version 1 aluminium airbox is.......not acceptable No pics as I "didn't like the look.....alot" Even after all my "CAD", and measurements, the leg near the fusebox just didn't sit right as it ended up about 10mm long and made the angle of the dangle look wrong, the height was a little short as well, meh, I wasn't that confident that Version 1 was going to be an instant winner I might give Version 2 another go, there's plenty of aluminium at work, but, after having in on and off a few times, and laying in the old OEM airbox without the new pod filter and MAF, there may be an option to modify the OEM air box and still use the Autoexe front cover and filter.... maybe This >  Needs to fit in here, but using the panel, and not the pod, the MAF will need to fit in the airbox though> I'm thinking as the old OEM box and Autoexe cover that is sitting in the shed is just sitting around doing nothing, and they are relatively abundant and cheap to replace if I mess it up and need another, it may well fit with some modifications to how the Autoexe brackets mounts to the rad support, and some dremiling to move it get in there, should give me some more room for activities, as I don't want to move the MAF and affect the tune Sealing the hole it requires to stick it in the air box is simple, a tight fit and some pinch weld will seal it up tight  I am calling this a later problem though
    • and it ends up being already priced in as though you're just on 91RON without any ethanol. Car will lose a bit of economy as the short and long term fuel trims bring down the AFR back to stoich or whatever it is for cruise/idle for the engine.  
×
×
  • Create New...