Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I need to pull my engine when I fit a new gearbox and will change over my head drain (Spool) to something nicer and get the plumbing to the dry sump tidied up. I was doing some googling to see what was around and came across this product, according to the video it removes water from the back of the head where it gets hot.

https://www.platinumracingproducts.com/products/rb-double-head-drain-oil-coolant

I'm not aware of this issue with RB's, is this just PRP selling us something we don't need because it looks great? 

 

It does mention grout filled blocks, so maybe it's applicable to those setups?

Plenty of SAU guys race their cars from grassroots motorsports (me) all the way to competition level ( @Duncan @34GeeTeeTee etc.) and we all don't have issues with water cooling or flow, it's more so keeping oil temps within its working parameters.

  • Like 1

I suspect that's who it's aimed at. Just to be clear, I don't have any cooling issues; I've spent plenty of time and money on the cooling system and it's got a 3 pass radiator, swirl pot and header tank which bleeds the system of air. 

I'd be interested to see if there was a temperature difference across the head significant enough to impact mixtures.

 

I have this head drain on my engine setup. It was already on the complete engine I bought when I got it.

We used the oil drain line to the sump and blocked the water line, others that run the same setup mine is based off for motorsport use and recommend the water line. 

Btw - I have a spare brand new one for sale if you want it 😄

Edited by bcozican
  • Like 1

People have been racing RBs for more than 2 decades on circuits without issue, if it was an issue HKS/GReddy/Tomei, etc. would have addressed this problem decades ago.

Like how HKS brought out the V-Cam setup for RB26 owners wanting more low down.

20 minutes ago, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

People have been racing RBs for more than 2 decades on circuits without issue, if it was an issue HKS/GReddy/Tomei, etc. would have addressed this problem decades ago.

Like how HKS brought out the V-Cam setup for RB26 owners wanting more low down.

The head that HKS did for me back in 2010 did add a fitting in the back of the head. -8 line around the front and tee’d in somewhere. Can’t remember where.

No idea if it does anything or not.

4B3887B2-0895-4570-BB2A-E57E14D526DB.png

  • Like 1
2 hours ago, bcozican said:

I have this head drain on my engine setup. It was already on the complete engine I bought when I got it.

We used the oil drain line to the sump and blocked the water line, others that run the same setup mine is based off for motorsport use and recommend the water line. 

Btw - I have a spare brand new one for sale if you want it 😄

Pm in coming.

  • 1 month later...

My engine builder builds many high power track RB's,  lots of dollars in the head, when I asked about the rear coolant drain he talked me out of it, so just doing oil drain only.

My previous experience with PRP is the bloke who runs it likes to sell all sorts of stuff and talk you into all sorts of stuff whether it benefits you, or whether it doesn't benefit you.

Edited by RB335
  • Like 3

Interesting thought to have:

People are saying water coolant temps are easy to keep down.

However, some need a lot of work on oil cooling.

Water temps are normally taken at the front of the motor or on the rad inlet/outlets.

Water and oil flow very differently in the motor.

 

What if, your oil is doing the majority of the cooling in the back of the engine?

Wouldn't this mean better water flow, less struggle with oil temps...

 

There is a reason those water heat exchangers work not only to help warm up the water quickly at startup, but also stabilise oil temperatures when oil starts to get warmer than water temp.

Possibly people using those oil/water heat exchangers could help with their oil temps too if oil temps are getting higher than water temp...

 

Just a few thoughts, as the issue people have is high oil temps in racing, which could be from poor thermal management, particularly from water flow...

  • 5 months later...
On 4/3/2023 at 8:30 PM, RB335 said:

My engine builder builds many high power track RB's,  lots of dollars in the head, when I asked about the rear coolant drain he talked me out of it, so just doing oil drain only.

My previous experience with PRP is the bloke who runs it likes to sell all sorts of stuff and talk you into all sorts of stuff whether it benefits you, or whether it doesn't benefit you.

My experience with the guy that runs PRP (Herman) is quite the opposite. He has talked me out of purchases more than into one. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Block bump. $400. As above cyl 6 needs bore or sleeve.
    • I would think making the argument that the travel is limited by a spring flexing against a spring perch as "the same method". Later on in the document they do state that the spring can't bind on full bump travel and cannot come loose in full rebound travel as well. (which is all very sensible). The laws are actually pretty sensible and reasonable. It's just that the people who enforce and check them don't actually read them or know them accurately. "Oh, coilovers? Instant fail mate. Don't even need to look at it." - Guy who will be instantly reported by me. There is probably merit to people who do get defected for height also get defected for the suspension in that state that allows it. I did never consider the people who are complaining about coilovers being picked on are also running around at 50mm off the floor.
    • I think given SAU's knowledge of E85 we can strongly conclude that 10% ethanol in almost any situation is entirely fine. Almost all of the myths against E85 were overblown, let alone E10.
    • From your link See bold text, is this referring to damper settings, if so that may a issue for "some" inspectors, I cannot see aftermarket coilovers having the evidence that "must be available that its functional performance is equivalent to the original" Maybe just remove the adjustment knows and hope for the best???? Meh 5.2 Suspension travel In all instances, modifications to a vehicle’s suspension must ensure the integrity of the system and not compromise the ride quality. At least two thirds of the original suspension travel should be maintained in both directions (rebound (i.e. extension) and bump (i.e. compression)), and rebound must be limited by the same method used by the vehicle manufacturer or if this is not practicable due to the nature of the modification, an equivalent method. If an alternative method is used, evidence must be available that its functional performance is equivalent to the original.
    • They actually don't - They adhere to VSB14 rules just like Victoria. The rules are against CABIN adjustable height, and it quite clearly states that the height has to be within parameters. I asked the VASS engineer to confirm this when I got my car engineered and they refused to engineer the coilovers because they didn't meet the requirements for requiring engineering. (mine are height adjustable.) People "Not wanting to bother" with "Actually reading/knowing/adhering to the rules" should result in fines and immediately losing the ability to issue blue slips and/or RWC's in Vic.
×
×
  • Create New...