Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • 1 month later...
2 hours ago, niZmO_Man said:

You trying to put 8.5" +18 on the front?

Correct. The car is lowered, but trying on my roommates R32 GTST it also hits in the same spot on his car and he's pretty much stock.

Edited by sommyken
  • 1 month later...

Hey guys, I have an R32 GTS-t that I am doing a GTR front end swap on and I can't find anything on wheel specs for front wheels? I've been looking and have specs for the rear when using overs but nothing for front wheel specs with GTR front fenders on a GTS-t. Anyone got some info?

On 11/09/2020 at 8:23 AM, Veltezza said:

Hey guys, I have an R32 GTS-t that I am doing a GTR front end swap on and I can't find anything on wheel specs for front wheels? I've been looking and have specs for the rear when using overs but nothing for front wheel specs with GTR front fenders on a GTS-t. Anyone got some info?

What? BNR32 wheel is 16x8 +30, this is plastered all over the internet.

20 hours ago, niZmO_Man said:

What? BNR32 wheel is 16x8 +30, this is plastered all over the internet.

I know that, I should've specified the size of wheels I'm trying to use. I'm trying to fit a 245/35/18 so the +30 isn't going to work.

  • 1 month later...

Hey guys needing help, trying to order some wheels currently and they need the specs of the calipers and such. Well I’ve taken the car to a mechanic and they’ve written down what they can and apparently it’s not enough so I was wondering if anyone has Cr 2p or 3p on their 33 Gtst and what disk type they chose? I’m planning to go 18x10.5 +15 
 

cheers 

56 minutes ago, Haruku33 said:

Hey guys needing help, trying to order some wheels currently and they need the specs of the calipers and such. Well I’ve taken the car to a mechanic and they’ve written down what they can and apparently it’s not enough so I was wondering if anyone has Cr 2p or 3p on their 33 Gtst and what disk type they chose? I’m planning to go 18x10.5 +15 
 

cheers 

Do you have GT-R guards? Or equivalent wide body?
Go to Work Wheels website and load up the specs PDF

  • 4 weeks later...
2 hours ago, Adz2332 said:

hey all

i cant get a cheap square set of AME Tracers for my 32 gtst

they are 18 x 9.5 +15

what are the chances of getting them under my gaurds? much of a roll?

I have a set of TE37SL's in 17 x 9.5 + 12 that fit well with a bit of a roll, an aggressive alignment and some slightly stretched tyres

16 minutes ago, White GTS-T said:

I have a set of TE37SL's in 17 x 9.5 + 12 that fit well with a bit of a roll, an aggressive alignment and some slightly stretched tyres

would love to see pics mate

  • 2 weeks later...

Skyline model = R34 GTT

Wheel diameter = 18'

Wheel width = 8.5

Wheel offset = 30 F and R

Tyre size = 265/35/18 (Overstretched by 1 size)

Modifications to fit = You will require some camber on the rear and front (nothing crazy) but will not scrub as tested at SMSP. I have since lowered the car by 20mm and only experience MINOR scrubbing on the un-rolled front guards.

Fronts: un-rolled

Rears: un-rolled

8 minutes ago, Ravskie said:

Wheel width = 8.5

Wheel offset = 30 F and R

Tyre size = 265/35/18 (Overstretched by 1 size)

I don't understand. That is not stretching the tyres onto the wheels at all. The correct tyre size for an 8.5 " wheel would be 235 or 245. A stretch would be a 225. Cramming a 265 on there is a big, baggy bulbour 1970s style fitment.

1 hour ago, GTSBoy said:

I don't understand. That is not stretching the tyres onto the wheels at all. The correct tyre size for an 8.5 " wheel would be 235 or 245. A stretch would be a 225. Cramming a 265 on there is a big, baggy bulbour 1970s style fitment.

Yeah, only old commodore owner do that because the oversized tyre cannot make a commodore handle any worse than it does originally.

tbf I have 265's on a 9 and it looks almost completely square with the rim.
image.png.aace023b84c622f9aac9507e1a7078d9.png
 

Forgive the blur. I could conceive someone putting it on a 8.5, but yeah I wouldn't spend the extra money on that when 255/245/235's are a thing.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
    • The downside of this is when you try to track the car, as soon as you hit ABS you get introduced to a unbled system. I want to avoid this. I do not want to bleed/flush/jack up the car twice just to bleed the f**kin car.
×
×
  • Create New...