
GTSBoy
Admin-
Posts
18,994 -
Joined
-
Days Won
312 -
Feedback
100%
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Gallery
Media Demo
Store
Everything posted by GTSBoy
-
Not really. Remember, the thermostat does nothing to cool the fluid. It just lets it through. Logically, if you covered all except for 10% of your radiator with cardboard, the fact that the thermostat cracks at 76° won't do anything to stop it from overheating. It is the cooling capacity of the cooler that determines that. And so, the size of the coolant radiator and the size of the oil cooler core and the relative amounts of heat that need to be dumped out through these and the relative capacity to dump heat are somewhat unrelated. You put a little oil cooler on and it will do wonders, up to a point. Then it won't be able to cope. Bigger cooler will keep oil T under control until some higher load. Then it too won't be big enough. A little perspective. I have a Neo. Stock oil/water HX under the filter, but with a sandwich plate added for oil T sensor. Aftermarket radiator. No oil cooler otherwise. Neo thermostat runs about 10° hotter than vanilla 25's TS. So, just in completely normal operation, almost** regardless of the season, my oil temp shows ~90°C, which, given the oil-water HX, is pretty much the expected water temperature too. The target coolant T for a Neo is in the order of 90-92°, or something like it. **In summer though, when it is really hot, my oil T will often be up at about 100°C. The oil-water HX can't move any more heat into the coolant, and the coolant is probably hotter too. And when it is really really hot weather, my oil T will be up at 110°C after everything is settled down to a steady state. And I would presume that my coolant is quite a lot higher than 100°C too. And when it is really really really f**king hot weather, my oil T will often peak at ~120°C as I get home after a ~30km drive from work in the afternoon. But that's fine. I'm not thrashing it. I'm just driving it. All of the above ignores use of air-con. If I have the AC running then the worst case temps in the above list will happen at lower ambient temps. Another mental note is that all of the above was with a different radiator than I have now. So we will have to wait until summer to find out if the new radiator is worse/same/as good.
-
1989 R32 gts4 now rwd. Need front suspension bits
GTSBoy replied to LINK17's topic in R Series (R30, R31, R32, R33, R34)
Kudos, Amayama, JustJap, various others, all stock Nissan/Pitowrk parts. You can also get them from numerous vendors on eBay. I don't even bother, for stuff like this. I just get my bro-in-law to buy them (he's a mechanic w/ shop) and he gets them from his usual suppliers. If you're not going to tackle the actual swapping of the parts (and these are reasonable sized tasks, so I'd guess you might not) then just getting the mechanic to source them for you will make him a little happier, as he will make some markup on the parts. Most mechanics are only so-so happy to fit owner supplied parts. They'll do it, but they won't like you for it! -
1989 R32 gts4 now rwd. Need front suspension bits
GTSBoy replied to LINK17's topic in R Series (R30, R31, R32, R33, R34)
I assume that you just need to change rack ends and upper ball joints. There are no "aftermarket" as in "modified" "upgraded" parts for those. There are "aftermarket" as in "3rd party" with some being equivalent to genuine Nissan/Pitwork and some being obvious cheap nasty China quality. If you're asking about other suspension arms, like upper and lower control arms and caster rods, then there are many options. Only some of them make sense (financial, or technical). But that's not what you were asking about, was it? -
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/480462-rb25det-neo-compression-test-reference/
-
Is that better than an RB20 camshaft?
-
No electric diff in R32. But, I had forgotten that the floor & gearbox mounts were different also! One more shell difference to add to the list.
-
GTX3076R GEN II VS GTX3576R GEN II on RB26
GTSBoy replied to joe89's topic in Engines & Forced Induction
Oh, I'm not arguing against putting a bigger core in it, or otherwise improving the cooling power. Go for your life on that. Just pointing out that I don't think a half second of continuing temperature rise after you back off is all the fault of the "slow" IAT sensor. -
Crack temp and hold temp are not the same thing. There's a whole mass and energy balance thing going in between the engine dumping heat into the oil and the cooler dropping it out. Just because the TS cracks at 70 does not mean that the cooler has any hope of holding the oil at that temperature. The factors at play are the "effective HTUs" of the core, which is comprised of the oil temperature and the cooling power of the ambient air flowing across it (more oil T drives HTUs up, less oil T drives HTUs down, likewise, more and colder ambient air flow drives HTUs up and vice versa). Against an ambient air T of, say 35°C, you only get ~half the HTUs out of the core at 70°C oil T as you would with 100+°C oil T. So even though you may see the 70°C crack T as being horribly low, it actually gives quite a soft start to the cooling power, which ramps up as the oil gets hotter (both because the TS opens more and as the hotter oil drives more heat transfer out of the core).
-
GTX3076R GEN II VS GTX3576R GEN II on RB26
GTSBoy replied to joe89's topic in Engines & Forced Induction
Well, it's as fast as you're gunna get, isn't it? It is always going to lag the real temperature if that happens to be changing as boost increases, intercooler heats up and rpm is changing by several hundred per second. As long as +/-10°C isn't going to kill anything, you should be OK. And....another significant factor. The intercooler stores heat. When you load it up under a boost run then back off, the heat in the cooler transfers into the air coming through. You have a lot less air coming through when you back off, so it is reasonable to expect the core to drop a bit more heat into each unit of air and thus raise the temp of that air up very close to the core's temp, for those first second or so after you come off the hammer. -
Old 2nd hand turbos are a risk. That turbo could be fine, or it could be f**ked. If it's f**ked in a way that you can't tell before you install, then you waste all the money spent on taking the car apart and putting it back together. Doubled, because you have to put the original turbo back on. If it is f**ked in such a way that it dies 10 minutes or 10 weeks down the track, it's the same, but worse, because you could be out on the highway somewhere, stuck in the snow. It's your gamble. You're probably more likely to blow up your original turbo though! There are many people around the world that can highflow a stocker. If you were in Oz I would have recommended that you contact Hypergear in Melbourne. You could still get a turbo from him, even from Japan. Have a look at their site. There are many options on the site - can be confusing. Just contact them direct if you want to go down that path and need help. https://hypergearturbos.com/product/nissan-rb25det-turbocharger-standard-high-flow-service/
-
Intercooler piping to suit GTR intercooler into R34 GTT
GTSBoy replied to Chris32's topic in Wanted to Buy
Let me know if you want contact deets. -
The chassis rails are different at the front. Not at the rear.
-
I don't think he was recommending the GTRS. That is also a very very old turbo. I would suggest that he is recommending a high flow. Where are you located?
-
LS3.
-
Squirt with spray can of teflon lube.
-
Front subframe is completely different. 4WD subframe will not bolt into RWD chassis. Rear guards are, or course, different. Fuel tank is different.
-
Oil Control In Rb's For Circuit Drag Or Drift
GTSBoy replied to Sydneykid's topic in Engines & Forced Induction
Yeah, once I heard rifling I assumed that the spiral shape was important to your thinking. The three big issues at hand are; oil viscosity/surface tension, qty of oil that needs to go down, qty of gas that needs to come up. I strongly suspect that cross sectional area is the king, assuming that the three main factors are essentially fixed for any given engine & operation thereof. Therefore I wouldn't expect to be able to pull too many tricks with the shape of the hole (which is essentially what any little keyway/slot runnign down one side of it would be). And further, narrow slots don't play well with movement of oil. Surface tension will hold a liquid in a narrow slot against gravity. So t probably wouldn't drain any better anyway. And then, if you just make the slot "not narrow", ie make it a bloody great wide slot, then it just comes back to extra cross sectional area. And possibly with the bad addition of sharp corners to create stress raisers. We're probably better off just agreeing to add big fat sump breathers and drill out the oil drains only if forced to (although, it's a bit late once the engine is running!) -
Oil Control In Rb's For Circuit Drag Or Drift
GTSBoy replied to Sydneykid's topic in Engines & Forced Induction
Well, for a circuit engine, you're probably right. Uh. maybe. But probably not. If you want to try to use rotation to generate centrifugal forces to keep the oil on the outer and gas up the centre then you'd really need to get the oil spinning before it enters the drain hole. Like a cyclone (you know, particle or droplet separator). That way the oil will spin out against the side and sort of stay there. But I doubt that there's a lot of benefit. Certainly not gunna be easy to do either, given cast iron, etc etc. Better to just do all the actually easy stuff. -
Oil Control In Rb's For Circuit Drag Or Drift
GTSBoy replied to Sydneykid's topic in Engines & Forced Induction
The thread may well be outdated relative to stupid power levels. The engine builders would rather an engine that has oil breathing problems than one that cracks the block, so are being (possibly excessively) conservative. The simple fact remains that more open area is required for gases to go up and oil to go down. However you achieve that is however you achieve that. I have no doubt that many have implemented the vents without drilling the block, which may well prove that you don't need to drill the returns. I don't have much skin in the game, but I think if I was building a moderately serious engine, I would drill the returns out as much as I thought they could take, and put stiffness back in via other means if I was aiming for more power than is actually useful. -
Can broken rocker arms damage valve stem reals?
GTSBoy replied to silviaz's topic in General Automotive Discussion
If you think about the violent thrashing of broken parts between the cam lobe and the valve while it's all flailing away at "over rev" speeds...... -
V35 Coupe LH Steering Knuckle
GTSBoy replied to Zyton's topic in V Series (V35, V36, V37 & Infiniti)
Is it too simple to say "import wreckers"? -
Oil Control In Rb's For Circuit Drag Or Drift
GTSBoy replied to Sydneykid's topic in Engines & Forced Induction
I'd be surprised if drilling the drains out would significantly weaken the block. Yeah, sure, when pushing to really big power figures you probably need every little bit of material you can get, but by then I'm sure you're in need of a half grout fill and so on anyway. -
Interested to know why you would panic. What do you know about it that I don't?