Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

On 29/03/2016 at 9:12 PM, XKLABA said:

Lets try this again :(

Rebuilt with 0.5mm bigger Wiseco pistons

New UE 260 x 10.8mm cams

OS88 with alloy shaft

Sold dyno wheels so was dynoed on 275-35-19s instead of 255-40-18s so revs are lower then indicated

Also Scott changed from Dyno Dynamics to Mainline which apparently reads lower :/

post-36620-0-97290200-1459246356_thumb.jpeg

Changed coils to Audi R8 NGKs

dailed cams back to 0 deg IN and 0 or 2 deg EX to try stop lifting head knowing we where going for 30psi

Tested rear turbo feed and got more the 10psi vacuum (test gauge only goes to 10psi) @19psi boost, should be good gains left there 

still on 275/35/19s 

engine bay

 

IMG_3363.JPG

IMG_3130.JPG

On 25/11/2017 at 12:38 PM, XKLABA said:

Tested rear turbo feed and got more the 10psi vacuum (test gauge only goes to 10psi) @19psi boost, should be good gains left there 

 

Solid power and delivery for low mount twins near 500kw!

Just for clarification, when you say "tested rear turbo feed and >10psi vacuum" - can you explain what you meant there?   I've been REALLY keen to know about if or how much vacuum a high-pressed low mount twin setup is drawing at the intake as I have long suspect that the piping will force a restriction as required airspeed goes up and it will initially push the pressure ratio up quite high, meaning a lot of setups will go off the comp map before they necessarily actually reach their flow potential at atmospheric vs inlet manifold pressure... so choke earlier than they would.  This would confirm that theory like a mofo.

The next thing however, if that is what is happening - when you say 10+psi "vacuum", you mean atmospheric pressure (~14.7psi) - 10psi, or ~4psi absolute pressure?   That is F-ALL.   Like crazy low.   The area of the map your compressor would be working in would be similar to if you were running near 90psi with no "vacuum" at the inlet :O

  • Like 1
  • 2 weeks later...

This result was more what I was hoping for . Had posted it on another thread but this is the update.

I have continually lost a little from the top end but still more than needed on the street, so The End, again :) 

To finish it off I added

ATS Tripple carbon clutch, the Coppermix Twin had to go, it was a great clutch.

Emtron KV8 ECU

EFR8374   1.05

Koolig Crank Trigger

5a2d0664de25b_E85lastScott.thumb.jpg.48474c7de20d9af95762285541bdb304.jpg

  • Like 3
  • 3 months later...

RB 25/30

CP 8.5:1 pistons

MRP rods, arp2000 bolts

ARP main studs

Oil pump drive adapter

RB25DET oil pump

Lightly ported r33 s2 head

Tomei 256x 8.5 poncams

Genuine greddy intake manifold

6x2200 injectors with flex fuel sensor

VH45 throttle body

150mm intercooler

Sinco twin scroll to manifold

66mm precision waste gate

Borg Warner s300sx 83/75 twin scroll .91 housing

4inch exhaust from turbo to back

Vipec i88 ECU with lithium choon

On a rough time with vct on the entire run made 378rwkws on hub dyno

 

 

 

video my mate made.

 

Still more boost and ethanol to come. Just chasing an oil pressure issue.

20180303_164605.jpg

Edited by Looney_Head
  • Like 2
  • 4 weeks later...

RB25 head, fixed cams Tighe grind 805C 8.9mm lift, 265 degree. Hydraulic lash adjust.

8.4:1 static CR. Freddy intake manifold, VH45 TB. 

6 boost exhaust manifold, 50mm Pro Gate. 3.5 inch exhaust from turbo back. 2 inch plumb back off gate.

Precision 6266CEA, single scroll 0.84 T3 flange.

Fuel - petrol.

Boost - 24psi consistent from 4200-720020180424_234850.thumb.jpg.81b3028be78b5fb623541d7af29ab32b.jpg

Issues - experienced timing scatter due to OEM CAS.

  • 3 months later...

My latest output on my 26/30 rips built engine on e85 with oem r8 coils made an extra 64hp on less boost had a missfire first went 658 with 29 with a miss and then when we replaced plugs and gapped them @.5.5 and set boost @27 psi it went the same power didnt do another power run on 29 psi little scared with the stock rods haha although they pushing these stock rods well over 500kw in nz.20180817_203954.jpg

My latest output on my 26/30 rips built engine on e85 with oem r8 coils made an extra 64hp on less boost had a missfire first went 658 with 29 with a miss and then when we replaced plugs and gapped them @.5.5 and set boost @27 psi it went the same power didnt do another power run on 29 psi little scared with the stock rods haha although they pushing these stock rods well over 500kw in nz.20180817_203954.thumb.jpg.32893ce1cd74399066b0597d13c16ee1.jpg
Better pic20180825_072034.jpg

Always wondered why my CR was down to 8.1:1 after my stroker build.

Thinking of going to 9.5:1 and might clean the head up, maybe even a P&P .

Anyone have results for increasing the CR from factory , up to 9.5 , maybe back to back Dyno runs on the same Dyno ?

10 minutes ago, Nismo 3.2ish said:

Always wondered why my CR was down to 8.1:1 after my stroker build.

Thinking of going to 9.5:1 and might clean the head up, maybe even a P&P .

Anyone have results for increasing the CR from factory , up to 9.5 , maybe back to back Dyno runs on the same Dyno ?

8.1... did you get some VL workshop to build the engine, either that or a seat painter that builds engines

  • 3 months later...

Stock rb25 s0 head.

Stock unknown kilometer rb30e bottom end with acl bearings, nitto head drain, rb25 oil pump and 1.1mm oil restrictors. 

1.3mm metal head gasket

6boost t3 exhaust manifold

Turbosmart hypergate 45mm

Ebay inlet plenum

660cc seimens injectors 

Haltech plugin

Hypergear atr45ss .82

3inch exhaust 

$50 intercooler 

Had a boost creep issue due to the wastegate being to small so mid range is lacking alot.

374kw was best run for the day, left it at 370kw on 24psi on bp98. 

 

20180327_225537.jpg

20180507_211006.jpg

Edited by lexxi32
  • Like 2
  • 1 month later...

Upgraded the main and head studs, switched from Splitfires to an R35 coil kit to solve the misfiring above 25psi, and added a few other things. Upped the boost to 29psi and made a few extra kilowatts and more torque.

Boost control and area under the curve is a work in progress, response was better before the upgrades so no doubt it can be improved upon again. Feels good on the street and makes peak boost in the 4+k RPM range. Screenshot_20190210-173517_Gallery.thumb.jpeg.c956888a52901786600bd0804597bcee.jpeg20190210_151554.thumb.jpeg.c5f046ecff3a67df9cb089a423fd5aaa.jpeg

 

 

  • Like 5

Video of one of the dyno runs:

It made 525kW at 27-26psi. We then turned the boost up to 29psi and on the next run just as it passed through 545kW the compressor outlet pipe clamp let go at about the 6000+rpm mark. Probably would have gone close to 555ishrwkw on that run. We quickly replaced the busted clamp and fired off two more runs at 29psi, both in the 549.Xrwkw range. I still think my GTX3584RS 1.01 combo is capable of 560-570rwkw on this dyno, with boost set to about 32-33psi. But the fuel system is completely maxed out at well over 90% DC and I'm not willing to increase base pressure any higher than 56-57psi. Close enough to call it 550rwkw will do.     

I have a Racelogic Traction Control system installed in the car and on the drive home I quickly discovered the previous setting of 5% slip is not enough to prevent excessive wheel spin in 3rd gear as it ramps up to peak torque. Lowering it to 4% was a little better, but 3% might be required. 0% is the wet weather setting through to 25% is minimal TC input.          

 

 

  • Like 7
On ‎12‎/‎10‎/‎2017 at 8:37 PM, Nismo 3.2ish said:

This result was more what I was hoping for . Had posted it on another thread but this is the update.

I have continually lost a little from the top end but still more than needed on the street, so The End, again :) 

To finish it off I added

ATS Tripple carbon clutch, the Coppermix Twin had to go, it was a great clutch.

Emtron KV8 ECU

EFR8374   1.05

Koolig Crank Trigger

5a2d0664de25b_E85lastScott.thumb.jpg.48474c7de20d9af95762285541bdb304.jpg

That thing is the ultimate street set-up with a heap of low and mid range torque, even way down at a mere 2,500rpm. It actually looks a little similar to my previous set-up (old spec's in signature and green curves on attached dyno sheet) although nowhere near the amount of low down torque on tap from your beast!  I guess that's to be expected with a 3.2L and ultra responsive EFR8374 vs. 3.0L and no frills HTA GT3586R.         

IMG_8573.JPG

Yeah Matt , end of the day it's what you want from your car. It's all fun but an expensive exercise ?

Here is the latest Dyno , bit hard to compare because you need same scaling setup on the printout to compare BUT it drives better.

As you can see it is hitting 24 psi and dropped off a little mid range but will be tuned again after some Klms have been clocked and a bit more boost added

Having trouble downloading Dyno ?

 

Edited by Nismo 3.2ish
trouble downloading dyno graph
  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah i found that alot of parts can be wrong or "very" hard to get the real right one. I already bought some brakes years ago on me "old" GT calipers and they were wrong too 😄  I told them too. Even send them pictures...but they said "EBC catalogue has them on my car... So i dont know what their answer will be. I call monday them and let them know that they are really not on my car. If they were they would be already on a car...
    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
×
×
  • Create New...