Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 312
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

This thread now has nothing at all to do with the original post...

Yes I realise this....I have tried a few times to try and sway the masses back however it just aint workin...Everybody is all wrapped up in bagging Supras...When that was never the case.

i must admit i cant stand the cross over pipe above the motor on the rb20s and rb25s. has proved to be a pain while working on my old 25 and many 20's (as u will know 26s are different). the only real option is to get an aftermarket plenum.

i used to get furious taking the pipe out when i had to work on my car... but then again i have a short temper lol.

So true, main reason why i got a forward facing plenum. Could not stand that cross over pipe and removing it all the time. Changing spark plugs when the car was hot was nearly impossible without majorly burning yourself. Why nissan couldn't put a modified GTR plenum with multiple throttle bodies on the GTST is beyond me. Surely it couldnt have cost them that much extra and would make the engine bay so much neater and practicle.

as for R34 turbos being better... ha! what a joke.. id like to see R34 turbos making 280kws everyday all day long consistantly or even at all

No problem, we have made 425 rwkw on standard R34GTR N1 turbos. The highest I have seen is 442 rwkw, not on one of our cars though.

Cheers

Gary

i used to have a tt supra and they shit all over r33's mate.

and yes the standard block will hold 400-500kw no worries f**ken

they look good with a subtle kit but not veilside

i had an na one before my turbo one and i muched many 33's off the lights.

they have a presence on the road that a 33 could never manifest mate

the only reason i dont have one now is coz i got t-boned

then i had a gtr so dont think i dont like skylines (i dont like 33's though)

this argument is pointless anyway. a car is a personal preference and ppl will get what they want.

i dont see how its possible to develope a car so far, and have it be beaten by 5 seconds on the GTR's first outing, not doubting it happened, but there is certainly something being left out, 5 seconds is HUGEE

Perhaps the issue is you don't understand the problems of racing to strict regulations. If I do everything exactly the same (as per the regs) to both cars, the R32GTR is far superior in race pace. It is more consistent, has superior brakes and cooling (intercooler and hydraulics) and looks after its tyres so much better. In qualifying the difference was around 2 seconds, but after 5 laps or so it blew out close to 5 seconds. That's what circuit racing is all about, how long it takes to go the race distance, meaning consistency.

and you'd like to see a supra do 8's on radials? they're already into the sevens mate (MSP did 7.8), 3300+pounds which i would deem full weight. a few have done 8's with stock 6 speed, Titan did 7.94 on stock 6 speed

Don't twist what I said, 8's on radials WITH a manual AND at full weight. Your examples are either autos or air shifters and/or drag slick and/or light weight.

as for traction in drag racing purposes, just find me how many skylines are running 9 sec passes on any tires, i have a list of 63 supras in the US alone that are doing 9's, and thats not even trying to find them, granted quite a few are on slicks, but there are heaps on radials too

The driver is on the left in the US, not the right. Supra TT's were sold there brand new, Skyline weren't. The tracks in the US crap all over ours. Hardly any Skylines race in the US. There are almost impossible to import to the US, and you think DOTARS is bad. That comparison has nothing to do with the car itself, simply the differences in availability.

i would also like to know what makes you say the inlet manifold on the supra is so crap? i've seen heaps of big horsepower cars using them succesfully

One throttle body :miner:

Cheers

Gary

i used to have a tt supra and they shit all over r33's mate.

and yes the standard block will hold 400-500kw no worries f**ken

they look good with a subtle kit but not veilside

i had an na one before my turbo one and i muched many 33's off the lights.

they have a presence on the road that a 33 could never manifest mate

the only reason i dont have one now is coz i got t-boned

then i had a gtr so dont think i dont like skylines (i dont like 33's though)

this argument is pointless anyway. a car is a personal preference and ppl will get what they want.

I actually don't think it is pointless at all. Let's try something simple, let's say I want a car for daily driving and the occasional track day. The GTR is far superior at that because of its 4wd (ever driven a high powered Supra in the wet?) and its inherent circuit racing superiority. On the other hand if you want a car for weekends only, when it's not raining and the occasional Friday night at the drags, then the Supra is arguably better. As long as you run decent tyres to overcome it's 2wd dissadvantage of course. There are heaps of other comparative examoles, I just chose those two as they are obvious. This discussion may just help someone make the right decision when choosing a car for their specific needs.

Cheers

Gary

i used to have a tt supra and they shit all over r33's mate.

and yes the standard block will hold 400-500kw no worries f**ken

I couldn't let this one slip, one exmaple will do it, 1100 bhp in a R33GTR with a standard block, it's called VMax built by Apexi. And it has AFM's :miner:

Cheers

Gary

I was actually a member here first because I was going to buy a GTR, but fell in love with the Supras shape and power potential :)

Funny that, i was the other way around and got the GTR, then a supra :miner:

looking at selling my car for a tt supra , wonder if cops give supra's less hassle

I havnt had any cop trouble except for RBT's of course and ive had mine for.....well......i dont know - feels like a while

I actually don't think it is pointless at all. Let's try something simple, let's say I want a car for daily driving and the occasional track day. The GTR is far superior at that because of its 4wd (ever driven a high powered Supra in the wet?) and its inherent circuit racing superiority. On the other hand if you want a car for weekends only, when it's not raining and the occasional Friday night at the drags, then the Supra is arguably better. As long as you run decent tyres to overcome it's 2wd dissadvantage of course. There are heaps of other comparative examoles, I just chose those two as they are obvious. This discussion may just help someone make the right decision when choosing a car for their specific needs.

Cheers

Gary

Wel said Gary!

I chose a GTR for the track/fast duties and i chose a stocker supra TT for daily driver/weekends etc

my best mate recently got a TT 95 supra...f**k i love it..so quick and makes a beautiful sound..its prettymuch a show car..custom audio install and all that jazz

i cant really falt it ay..as much as id like to to deflate his big head haha..theres just nothing wrong.

OH actually..the rear seats are pointless haha no room in there..thats it lol

You are all wrong as i would rather one of these

0503_22z__Mazda_RX7__Driver_Side_Rear_View.jpg

Quick enough, handle well enough, 1,001 Tools dont drive them liek is the case with Skylines and Supras and The Toyotas and Skylines can only dream of looking as good as one of these.

Has nothing to do with this thread, then again neither do half the posts in this thread. :miner: Ok well maybe if i say the Supra is worse then the Skyline....but i happen to love the black Espirit Supra with HKS 3240 and other goodies...quick on the real tracks like Fugi, Suzuka etc. Not that goat track that is Tsukuba

my best mate recently got a TT 95 supra...f**k i love it..so quick and makes a beautiful sound..its prettymuch a show car..custom audio install and all that jazz

i cant really falt it ay..as much as id like to to deflate his big head haha..theres just nothing wrong.

OH actually..the rear seats are pointless haha no room in there..thats it lol

The back seats are pointless hey!

I had a 6ft guy in the back next to a fattish bloke and the gf in the front seat once. Never again will that happen.

Now my backseat is purely for carrying a briefcase/cd's/general crap

Perhaps the issue is you don't understand the problems of racing to strict regulations. If I do everything exactly the same (as per the regs) to both cars, the R32GTR is far superior in race pace. It is more consistent, has superior brakes and cooling (intercooler and hydraulics) and looks after its tyres so much better. In qualifying the difference was around 2 seconds, but after 5 laps or so it blew out close to 5 seconds. That's what circuit racing is all about, how long it takes to go the race distance, meaning consistency.

Don't twist what I said, 8's on radials WITH a manual AND at full weight. Your examples are either autos or air shifters and/or drag slick and/or light weight.

The driver is on the left in the US, not the right. Supra TT's were sold there brand new, Skyline weren't. The tracks in the US crap all over ours. Hardly any Skylines race in the US. There are almost impossible to import to the US, and you think DOTARS is bad. That comparison has nothing to do with the car itself, simply the differences in availability.

One throttle body :whistling:

Cheers

Gary

Seriously, it sounds like you're just hating on Supra's. The brembos used in a GTR and the Supra 4 pot brakes are hardly leagues apart given proper pads/rotors in your setup. Cooling, again depends how well you develop this, there are aluminium replacement SMIC's for the supra that will provide much better cooling than any FMIC arrangement, again comparing apples to apples there should not be any difference in cooling a charge through either car, as the running lengths of the pipes are not severly different. Hydraulics I can't speak about, but from my own annecdotal experience I have never had any hydraulic fluids fail in any supra's I've raced or had friends race in.

Do some research and you'll find that Skylines are JUST as prevalent on US racing circuits as supra's are despite their exclusivity in that market. There are plenty of them kicking around, but due to their much larger population are dispersed quite thinly along the continent.

I actually don't think it is pointless at all. Let's try something simple, let's say I want a car for daily driving and the occasional track day. The GTR is far superior at that because of its 4wd (ever driven a high powered Supra in the wet?) and its inherent circuit racing superiority. On the other hand if you want a car for weekends only, when it's not raining and the occasional Friday night at the drags, then the Supra is arguably better. As long as you run decent tyres to overcome it's 2wd dissadvantage of course. There are heaps of other comparative examoles, I just chose those two as they are obvious. This discussion may just help someone make the right decision when choosing a car for their specific needs.

Cheers

Gary

Again, I really don't know what you're on about, the only issue myself, or any competent supra driver will experience in the wet is aquaplaning from the large tyres you can fit under stock guards, it might not be 4wd traction, but I can boost just fine in heavy rain and have the wheels hook up with no wheel spin, that is, unless you're a fan of clutch dumps from a dig.

I couldn't let this one slip, one exmaple will do it, 1100 bhp in a R33GTR with a standard block, it's called VMax built by Apexi. And it has AFM's :D

Cheers

Gary

Again, look at the USA, 1000hp at the rears has been done to death on a stock block in a supra, it may not last forever but it's been done enough to know it's a ticking bomb, albeit a much safer one than your 1100bhp gtr on standard block.

In regard to the original post,

NA supra = small penis

If your mate still tells you your skyline is crap, then all you have to say is

- Your mum didn't think the back seat was crap :whistling:

Problem solved

Its probably like the ford\holden saga - lame

I dont know a whole lot about the supra as it was never a consideration when i was looking for my car. Its looks alone deterred me right from the get go.

2 observations come to mind however, One being the laugh I got when I upgraded my gtst brakes to a brembo setup and had a supra driver climbing all over me to sell him my stock nissan brakes. Apparently the nissan brakes are considered an upgrade on the supra. (rolls eyes)

The other being the lack of supras I see at performance venues, I regularly attend and participate in my local drag (willowbank) tnt nights and time attack (QLD raceway), There are plenty of skylines mostly street driven pounding the asphalt at both venues but it is an absolute rarity to see a supra at either.

Most of the supra activity around here involves bling wheels, A very large ironong board on the boot and just cruising the main street with drivers cock hanging out the window saying "Look at me"

One can only assume that the line attracts a sportsman whereas the supra attracts the posers. To each his own I guess but the posing deal leaves me cold.

Also interesting to note is that I see and am involved with far more skyline peeps than supra types but i have seen as many if not more of these so called unbreakable jz motors come to grief than RB's.

I like both.

I've got an R33 GTS-t and a '93 NA Aero Top Supra.

Skyline is more fun. NA Supra is nice to cruise, but with auto box that's about it.

I was amazed by how fast the TT Supras are with only exhaust and pod filter. My friend bought one and ever since driving that my skyline feels so slow.

Now my Supra's up for sale and Skylines in for some mods in the near future..

I like both.

I've got an R33 GTS-t and a '93 NA Aero Top Supra.

Skyline is more fun. NA Supra is nice to cruise, but with auto box that's about it.

I was amazed by how fast the TT Supras are with only exhaust and pod filter. My friend bought one and ever since driving that my skyline feels so slow.

Now my Supra's up for sale and Skylines in for some mods in the near future..

Wait? A twin turbo 3 Litre makes your single turbo 2.5 feel slow?

NO WAI!

:D

I have both! I have an R34 GTR, and R32 GTS-t, a MKIV Supra and a husband who works at Millennium Motorsports who are Supra Crazy, and I can't complain about either of them, I love them - They're my Top 2 Fave 'Attainable' Cars... (I'd pass them all up for a DB9, Lamborghini, Dodge or Zonda! :) ) Granted I'll never own another Skyline that's not a GTR, or any car that's not turbo, charged or V8+ but imo the NA Supra's are MUCH MUCH more impressive than any NA Skyline..

Here are some interesting stock specs to ponder :D

Make Model Power Torque Redline Kerb Weight 0-100km 400 metres

Nissan Skyline R32 GTS-T 160kw @ 6400rpm 263nm @ 3200rpm 7500rpm 1260 kg 6.49 seconds 14.63 seconds

Nissan Skyline R32 GTR 208kw @ 6400rpm 353nm @ 4400rpm 7500rpm 1470 kg 4.79 seconds 12.80 seconds

Nissan Skyline R33 GTS T-25T 187kw @ 6400rpm 295nm @ 4800rpm 7000rpm 1390 kg 6.18 seconds 14.39 seconds

Nissan Skyline R33 GTR 208kw @ 6800rpm 367nm @ 4400rpm 8000rpm 1530 kg 5.30 seconds 13.30 seconds

Nissan Skyline R34 25GT-Turbo 206kw @ 6400rpm 343nm @ 3200rpm 7000rpm 1410 kg 6.00 seconds 14.20 seconds

Nissan Skyline R34 GT-R 208kw @ 6800rpm 392nm @ 4400rpm 8000rpm 1540 kg 4.90 seconds 12.90 seconds

Toyota Supra SZ 168kw @ 6800rpm 284nm @ 4800rpm 6800rpm 1430 kg 6.59 seconds 14.89 seconds

Toyota Supra RZ 208kw @ 5600rpm 430nm @ 3600rpm 7000rpm 1490 kg 5.92 seconds 13.93 seconds

both are great cars. f**k it who cares. its not a pissing contest. You should all be happy that there are so many great cars available for us to choose from. No use ragging on shit, we know both have great potential in looks and power.

As usual there is a thousand and one things going for each car. Skyline costs half the price for usually a newer year, but doesnt have 3 litre capacity. Skyline has a rear seat thats somewhat usable, but the supras rear end is just pure porn. List goes on and on.

Edited by Granthem

unique.jpg

Supras with a decent set of rims look great, such as that example.

Haha Supra vs Skyline threads are funny. There are some of these on the AU supra forums.

Havent read the whole thread, but some of SAU members sprout alot of shit.

Whoever said nissan brakes are a common upgrade for Supras is a dickhead. The most common

brake upgrade for the Supra is the big brake option found on RZ speced Supras. THATS IT. Nissan brake upgrades on Supras are unheard of, even on the old models.

And as for Sydney Kid saying the clutch and brake fluids boil in the supra, hahahaha!

Lets not quickly forget about the RB26 oil starvation issues on the track shall we?

Edited by OBaYBe

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I agree with everything else, except (and I'm rethinking this as it wasn't setup how my brain first though) if the sensor is at the end of a hose which is how it has been recommended to isolate it from vibrations, then if that line had a small hole in, I could foresee potentially (not a fluid dynamic specialist) the ability for it to see a lower pressure at the sensor. But thinking through, said sensor was in the actual block, HOWEVER it was also the sensor itself that broke, so oil pressure may not have been fully reaching the sensor still. So I'm still in my same theory.   However, I 100% would be saying COOL THE OIL DOWN if it's at 125c. That would be an epic concern of mine.   Im now thinking as you did Brad that the knock detection is likely due to the bearings giving a bit more noise as pressure dropped away. Kinkstah, drop your oil, and get a sample of it (as you're draining it) and send it off for analysis.
    • I myself AM TOTALLY UNPREPARED TO BELIEVE that the load is higher on the track than on the dyno. If it is not happening on the dyno, I cannot see it happening on the track. The difference you are seeing is because it is hot on the track, and I am pretty sure your tuner is not belting the crap out of it on teh dyno when it starts to get hot. The only way that being hot on the track can lead to real ping, that I can think of, is if you are getting more oil (from mist in the inlet tract, or going up past the oil control rings) reducing the effective octane rating of the fuel and causing ping that way. Yeah, nah. Look at this graph which I will helpfully show you zoomed back in. As an engineer, I look at the difference in viscocity at (in your case, 125°C) and say "they're all the same number". Even though those lines are not completely collapsed down onto each other, the oil grades you are talking about (40, 50 and 60) are teh top three lines (150, 220 and 320) and as far as I am concerned, there is not enough difference between them at that temperature to be meaningful. The viscosity of 60 at 125°C is teh same as 40 at 100°C. You should not operate it under high load at high temperature. That is purely because the only way they can achieve their emissions numbers is with thin-arse oil in it, so they have to tell you to put thin oil in it for the street. They know that no-one can drive the car & engine hard enough on the street to reach the operating regime that demands the actual correct oil that the engine needs on the track. And so they tell you to put that oil in for the track. Find a way to get more air into it, or, more likely, out of it. Or add a water spray for when it's hot. Or something.   As to the leak --- a small leak that cannot cause near catastrophic volume loss in a few seconds cannot cause a low pressure condition in the engine. If the leak is large enough to drop oil pressure, then you will only get one or two shots at it before the sump is drained.
    • So..... it's going to be a heater hose or other coolant hose at the rear of the head/plenum. Or it's going to be one of the welch plugs on the back of the motor, which is a motor out thing to fix.
    • The oil pressure sensor for logging, does it happen to be the one that was slowly breaking out of the oil block? If it is,I would be ignoring your logs. You had a leak at the sensor which would mean it can't read accurately. It's a small hole at the sensor, and you had a small hole just before it, meaning you could have lost significant pressure reading.   As for brakes, if it's just fluid getting old, you won't necessarily end up with air sitting in the line. Bleed a shit tonne of fluid through so you effectively replace it and go again. Oh and, pay close attention to the pressure gauge while on track!
    • I don't know it is due to that. It could just be due to load on track being more than a dyno. But it would be nice to rule it out. We're talking a fraction of a second of pulling ~1 degree of timing. So it's not a lot, but I'd rather it be 0... Thicker oil isn't really a "bandaid" if it's oil that is going to run at 125C, is it? It will be thicker at 100 and thus at 125, where the 40 weight may not be as thick as one may like for that use. I already have a big pump that has been ported. They (They in this instance being the guy that built my heads) port them so they flow more at lower RPM but have a bypass spring that I believe is ~70psi. I have seen 70psi of oil pressure up top in the past, before I knew I had this leak. I have a 25 row oil cooler that takes up all the space in the driver side guard. It is interesting that GM themselves recommend 0-30 oil for their Vette applications. Unless you take it to the track where the official word is to put 20-50w oil in there, then take that back out after your track day is done and return to 0-30.
×
×
  • Create New...