Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I've built a a pair for Chequrered tuning's LS1 V8, that is mainly getting the advantage of running extra timing for the high comp V8. I'm awaiting on the manifold for my GTR, So I don't currently have a result for this particular turbocharger. Are you looking for some thing that suits a Rb20det?

How ever I have do have an result using the exact same compressor and turbine, except been in a VNT housing. You can reference to the ATR43SS4-Alpha model. That would give you an approximate peek power and boost to power ratio.

While I'm in here, I have twin GT-RSs on my RB2630 and the rear wheels are choking it up top, is there an option to fit a bigger turbine wheel ?

Just a quick update. I'm in the process of making a 55mm exhaust wheel for SR20det motor. That is a mm a side bigger then your GTRs turbine all around. I will doing some evaluations ready, they should be the solution for your current issue on the Rb2630 and pickup more mid / top rang torque also.

Haha oops, for some reason I thought they where 11 blade, was thinking of something else :/

How long till you start doing these and what would be a guesstimate of cost to rebuild two turbos with these wheels ?

Grinding shaft at moment, probably two weeks away. If you wish to send me the compressor wheel I can definitely build them with the new exhaust wheel.

Some updates. Those are videos sent in by John Reco, fastest lap SAU VIC track day last week. Fastest lap:

fronts.jpg
Hypergear 21U highflow turbo on standard manifold
Havoc custom pipework and exhaust
Chequred Tuning 300kw responsive tune E85
Motul Fluids 8100 15w50, Comp Gear Oil & RBF600
Tyrepower Frankston wheel alignment
4.3 Diff gears
285/30 R18 Yokohama Neova AD08R

  • Like 1

Should be able to customize turbine housings. Depending on what sort of car it is for.

comps.jpg

Further development into the ATR28SS Alpha Series based my S14 with a SR20det motor using BC S2 cams.

This is a base line for CBB SS2 Alpha version, Vnt is not current engaged. Final result of 302rwkws on 24psi P98 fuel.

power.jpg

boost.jpg

SS2 Alpha Base line compare to Standard SS2:

ss2vspower.jpg

Makes the same amount of power, but is slightly more responsive.

ss2vsboost.jpg

Base line Vs Garrett GT2871R in .64 rear:

powerv2871.jpg

boostv2871.jpg

Its currently making 190rwkws and 21psi @ 4000RPM. It drives pretty good the way it is. The goal would be matching the GT2871 curve without losing any top end.

  • 2 weeks later...

So I am helping someone make their RB25 Skyline go a bit quicker, so after much discussion the choice to go with an ATR43-SS2 was made - as soon as we nut out how to best pay across international borders we may have the first Hypergear turbo on NZ soil that I am aware of. Looking forward to checking one of these things out in person after all the discussion, and will be nice to have first hand experience of the SS2 :)

If I'm allowed I'll post results after we are done with it - will be internally gated, stock manifolds all around, BP98 on a stock internal RB25.

  • Like 1

Firstly sorry for being lazy. But what is the best direct bolt in turbo for an R33 gts on E85 shooting for around 400rwhp with as much response as poss. Or is it worth going external gate and or big dump?

Depending on how lenient the dyno is he will be getting about 340-370 hp around there, varies alot with dyno's.

Thats at 16-20 psi

I'll be tuning the internally gated one on BP98 with a Dynapack hub dyno, probably not as tough an audience as you guys are overall used to - though similar to some. Will probably go for around 18psi, but will see how knock limited it is and decide whether to go higher from there.

SS1PU Internal Gate will do it, I personally prefer to run an external gate because you can sneak in more timing

Thanks

Is the ATR43ss2 a lot bigger or ok for what I'm looking at? Don't mind going external gate, prob off exhaust housing.

This is for a track car.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...