Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

This is a prototype ATR43 G4 520HP CHRA. It runs on shortened bearings and weigh reduced turbine for maximum response. engineered to produce about 300rwkws at 20psi on .63 ATR43's turbine housing using RB25det engine with supporting mods.

The smaller one on the photo is ATR43 G1 350HP CHRA. Its made for 240rwkws with excellent street response.

3.jpg

5.jpg

1.jpg

2.jpg

4.jpg

Compare to ATR28G4 it has lighter turbine with shorter bearings. So it should have slightly better response. I might update this CHRA into the ATR28G4 once its been evaluated.

Turbine housing is getting made. I'm going to swap this 2x with my existing high flowing customers. probably Geraus and SS8_Gohan for some dyno and evaluation results.

For time been we will still be using proven ATR28 CHRAs. Price wise I don't know at this stage. depends on how much it cost to build the rear housing.

hi,

i skimmed through quickly but didnt find the exact answer i was looking for.

what turbo would you suggest is the most efficient/responsive for a Rb20(r32) wanting to make 240-250rwkw while keeping the stock manifold, but being externally gated.

thanks.

hi,

i skimmed through quickly but didnt find the exact answer i was looking for.

what turbo would you suggest is the most efficient/responsive for a Rb20(r32) wanting to make 240-250rwkw while keeping the stock manifold, but being externally gated.

thanks.

i went with a ATR28G3 with 0.63 internal gate rear for my rb20... i'm looking for a tad more power than you

so maybe look at a ATR28G2

hook us up Stao :P:ninja:

we going to need new dumps? and am i going to have to run stuff in again... done so much friggen running in with this car :P

EDIT: so are you saying these will be laggier or potentially, they might be a little more responsive and make a bit more power?

3.jpg

Nice love the pointy wheel. Hopping to see the complete turbo and some results soon.

ps.

would this punch a whole on my foot if I drop it upset down? :ninja:

Edited by kwickr33

Today got the turbine housing made. It is .86 in a T28 which is equivalent to a .63 in a T3x.

It is bolt on to stock T3x manifold and 6bolt dump.

th3.jpg

th2.jpg

th1.jpg

The Very first ATR43i 520HP G4 in T3 .64 Turbine is complete:

atr43f.jpg

atr43b.jpg

We'll be making few more different A/Red turbine housings in the next few weeks. We will also be engineering a 650HP profile CHRA to suit a .84 Bolton Rear housing.

Well stock turbo won't make 520HP. Bigger turbos will creat more lag. This is a G4 profile, made for 300rwkws.

We also have this in G1 and G2 profiles which are rated 350HP and 450HP. The G1 would have very similar response as the stock turbo to produce max of 240rwkws, G2 is about 300RPM laggier but but its good for upto 270rwkws.

Price wise This turbo is $1300 to complete. With normal Turbine housing which comes out in a Vband rear is $1050 internally gated. or $950 externally gated with a 5 bolt flange.

didn't i have a G2 originally? that was about 230rwkw at 15psi -

gotta remember, "most" people won't be bolting these onto built engines (IMO) - they'll chuck em on, run 15/16/17psi and that's probably about it. I'm only running a bit more boost because of E85, otherwise, 17psi would probably be my max.

will give you a call/email asap about the .63

Yes but that was in stock R33's turbine housing. Now they are running in a .63 T3x rear housing, The spec of it is very similar to a GT3071. So it should make around 260rwkws at 18psi of boost on 98 fuel

Yes but that was in stock R33's turbine housing. Now they are running in a .63 T3x rear housing, The spec of it is very similar to a GT3071. So it should make around 260rwkws at 18psi of boost on 98 fuel

do you also make this turbo with an externally gated rear housing?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Should be more than fine, especially the overall fuel pressure would never exceed 3.5bar (assuming that thing never gets more than 0.5bar of boost in stock form). According to the chart, it's 11amps.
    • I definitely know the first rule here, look first, ask second. I've seen many people get roasted 😂 I found a few diagrams for the RB, but I'm yet to come across one for the VQ. From what I have read, the pump gets the +12v along with the FPCM, and it's the negative wire that gets passed through the resistor to regulate the voltage. So I assume I can just ground the negative wire at the pump to eliminate the FPCM control. But I really wanted to see the VQ circuit diagram first to make sure I understood it correctly. Once the new pump is in I'll do some testing to see how it behaves, and in the meantime, I'll keep looking for a wiring diagram. Thanks for your help mate, your time is greatly appreciated.    
    • Maybe? I have the Supercheap ToolPro low thingo. It has a somewhat smaller diameter lifting "bowl" than you would expect on a workshop grade trolley jack, and a split rubber pad to suit that diameter. It clears the "N1" style skirts I have. Probably wouldn't if the jack's bowl and a suitably larger rubber block were in use. Having said that though.....you only need the rubber block to exist on the inner side of the pinchweld, so could carve away any rubber that fouled the skirt, leaving some there for "insurance" </simples>
    • I used to do that (sills with rubber jack block).. ... then I got side skirts, and there's no way for the jack to actually work there, the jack pad itself on the jack is too big. Is the answer to use a... smaller (?) jack? Hmmm.
    • I have too much trauma from every skyline I've ever seen having crushed jack points/pinch welds lol.    Yep, works 100%, it's what I use when I'm using the quick jack. Don't know why I can't also bring myself to do the same thing when I'm using a jack. I blame the skyline PTSD. 
×
×
  • Create New...