Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

This is a prototype ATR43 G4 520HP CHRA. It runs on shortened bearings and weigh reduced turbine for maximum response. engineered to produce about 300rwkws at 20psi on .63 ATR43's turbine housing using RB25det engine with supporting mods.

The smaller one on the photo is ATR43 G1 350HP CHRA. Its made for 240rwkws with excellent street response.

3.jpg

5.jpg

1.jpg

2.jpg

4.jpg

Compare to ATR28G4 it has lighter turbine with shorter bearings. So it should have slightly better response. I might update this CHRA into the ATR28G4 once its been evaluated.

Turbine housing is getting made. I'm going to swap this 2x with my existing high flowing customers. probably Geraus and SS8_Gohan for some dyno and evaluation results.

For time been we will still be using proven ATR28 CHRAs. Price wise I don't know at this stage. depends on how much it cost to build the rear housing.

hi,

i skimmed through quickly but didnt find the exact answer i was looking for.

what turbo would you suggest is the most efficient/responsive for a Rb20(r32) wanting to make 240-250rwkw while keeping the stock manifold, but being externally gated.

thanks.

hi,

i skimmed through quickly but didnt find the exact answer i was looking for.

what turbo would you suggest is the most efficient/responsive for a Rb20(r32) wanting to make 240-250rwkw while keeping the stock manifold, but being externally gated.

thanks.

i went with a ATR28G3 with 0.63 internal gate rear for my rb20... i'm looking for a tad more power than you

so maybe look at a ATR28G2

hook us up Stao :P:ninja:

we going to need new dumps? and am i going to have to run stuff in again... done so much friggen running in with this car :P

EDIT: so are you saying these will be laggier or potentially, they might be a little more responsive and make a bit more power?

3.jpg

Nice love the pointy wheel. Hopping to see the complete turbo and some results soon.

ps.

would this punch a whole on my foot if I drop it upset down? :ninja:

Edited by kwickr33

Today got the turbine housing made. It is .86 in a T28 which is equivalent to a .63 in a T3x.

It is bolt on to stock T3x manifold and 6bolt dump.

th3.jpg

th2.jpg

th1.jpg

The Very first ATR43i 520HP G4 in T3 .64 Turbine is complete:

atr43f.jpg

atr43b.jpg

We'll be making few more different A/Red turbine housings in the next few weeks. We will also be engineering a 650HP profile CHRA to suit a .84 Bolton Rear housing.

Well stock turbo won't make 520HP. Bigger turbos will creat more lag. This is a G4 profile, made for 300rwkws.

We also have this in G1 and G2 profiles which are rated 350HP and 450HP. The G1 would have very similar response as the stock turbo to produce max of 240rwkws, G2 is about 300RPM laggier but but its good for upto 270rwkws.

Price wise This turbo is $1300 to complete. With normal Turbine housing which comes out in a Vband rear is $1050 internally gated. or $950 externally gated with a 5 bolt flange.

didn't i have a G2 originally? that was about 230rwkw at 15psi -

gotta remember, "most" people won't be bolting these onto built engines (IMO) - they'll chuck em on, run 15/16/17psi and that's probably about it. I'm only running a bit more boost because of E85, otherwise, 17psi would probably be my max.

will give you a call/email asap about the .63

Yes but that was in stock R33's turbine housing. Now they are running in a .63 T3x rear housing, The spec of it is very similar to a GT3071. So it should make around 260rwkws at 18psi of boost on 98 fuel

Yes but that was in stock R33's turbine housing. Now they are running in a .63 T3x rear housing, The spec of it is very similar to a GT3071. So it should make around 260rwkws at 18psi of boost on 98 fuel

do you also make this turbo with an externally gated rear housing?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • They care about emissions, and cost the most. Save weight where possible, and make manufacturing easier. Less material also let's the engine transfer heat to water quicker, and bring the engine up to temp quicker, better for emissions and getting them past their warranty period.
    • I was under the impression the reason why OEMs are going with solutions like relatively thin "right-sized" cylinder walls with technologies like PTWA and open deck is because they care a lot about whatever marginal knock margin benefits they get from that vs the structural rigidity benefits of a closed deck block and thicker cylinder walls. I also see some weird stuff like plastic inserts in the water jacket around the cylinders to try and equalize cylinder wall temperatures. re: the PRP blocks and heads at the end of the day it's hard to know what is and isn't going to work there, just have to see what the initial buyers say about it.
    • Which is why I didn't mention that hardness testing, and specifically mentioned the bore and deck thickness testing. Yeah, not really. The bore temperature will be a lot more even around the top half inch or so, where the material distribution is dominated by the deck, and which is the only place where the bore surface temperature heating any gas in the cylinder is likely to have any effect on detonation. Think about it. Another inch or so down the bore, you might have a hotter spot. The gas there might get a bit hotter, then the piston rises squeezes that gas away from there at high speed and mixes it with other gas from nearby. Instant dilution of the problem. I'd be surprised if it was an issue at any time other than in racing engines or OEM dev engines being run at the ragged edge of tuning. Say what now?
    • https://dsportmag.com/the-tech/education/engine-tech-material-hardness-testing/ The PRP testing on block hardness I'm not sure how much it actually can be trusted. The thinner cylinder walls on RBs is a bit of a problem vs 2JZ but it really depends on the design goal. Siamesed cylinder bores like a 2JZ cause uneven cylinder wall temps too, which means a bit of distortion induced by that + the hotspot can affect knock margin. Something that actually gives me a bit of pause with the PRP block, whether super thick cylinder walls are going to keep it from being drop-in compatible on an otherwise OEM rebuild. 
    • Yeah very valid point. I am waiting for one of the other tuners to come back from vacation so he can help me a bit when the cat is installed again. In the meantime I am going to finish up my polishing and ceramic coating that I have started myself.    N45 Dr Beasley product is highly recommended for a paint primer / polisher. Using this EXO Gtechniq also for the ceramic but next time might use the light serum before hand also. Looks great. 
×
×
  • Create New...