Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

The current one is capable of 330rwkws. I'm looking to trade that 30kws for roughly 300rpms of response making full boost of 20psi by 3900 Rpm instead of current 4200 rpm.

I'll finally be buying a turbo off you around July so ill see where your at with FNT and VNT designs of the G3 then. VNT sounds like it will be great if its a reality that soon

After studying motion of the vnt turbine setup I'm wondering if it actually creep heat when the nozzles directs in opposing direction. Appears the nozzle arrangement needs to be reset from scratch for it to work. Or for what I want it to do.

I've contacted Matt to see if he might know what could cause the corruption, as everything was perfect a month a go when I last drove the car.

There's Nistune documentation that talks about ECU corruption and how it can be caused. Worth a read. A loose Nistune board is just one path to corruption.

There's Nistune documentation that talks about ECU corruption and how it can be caused. Worth a read. A loose Nistune board is just one path to corruption.

Ah great, do you know which of the documents it's in? I've contacted Matt about it but he hasn't replied yet.

Thing is, I didn't touch anything related to the ECU, and it was perfect when I drove it in. Surely it has to be something related to my messing around with it all, it's not just coincidence?

After studying motion of the vnt turbine setup I'm wondering if it actually creep heat when the nozzles directs in opposing direction. Appears the nozzle arrangement needs to be reset from scratch for it to work. Or for what I want it to do.

So this is going to take a while?

Ah great, do you know which of the documents it's in? I've contacted Matt about it but he hasn't replied yet.

Thing is, I didn't touch anything related to the ECU, and it was perfect when I drove it in. Surely it has to be something related to my messing around with it all, it's not just coincidence?

http://nistune.com/docs/NIStune_Diagnostics_Document.pdf

Thanks for that mate.

Makes me wonder whether the message was passed on that my ECU has a Stagea image in it. I forgot to tell Sean when I dropped the car off, but I phoned up and let them know, the bloke was confused but he said he would write it down. Now I wonder whether or not he told Sean before he started trying to tune it, if he tried to use the R34 image with my ECU then it wouldn't have worked. I'll have to give them a call tomorrow morning and get hold of Sean himself.

Edited by Hanaldo

You might be able to get away with editing the fuel & ignition maps (and most other normal tables and scalars) in the Stagea image using the R34 address file, because I've been doing essentially that myself over the last few days. Load up the Stagea address file, then the bin file for what's in my ECU, then an R34 bin as comparison, and looking to see where the differences are. As you'd expect, the two ECUs are essentially the same. Same ECU, same engine. Just a few differences in the ABS/TCS department.

But....because you can do that, it might be very easy for the tuner to use an R34 address file, load up an R34 bin file, then sync from the ECU and or/ sync to the ECU and perhaps cause havoc. Just because there are some differences.

depending on how much problems I might encounter. would be couple of month at least.

Sweet as. ill keep an eye out

I'm waiting till July now till I get something so if its not far off by then I might just wait.

Sounds like it will be impressive :)

This assembly should have some effects, With the device engaged the turbo gains faster response how ever the engine pins up top, with it disengaged the motor picks up 8 degrees of timing up top but loses big chunk of power band down low. So I want it to be engaged till about 20psi then slowly released after that point to gain the top end timing. That way we should have fat power band from start to end.

You might be able to get away with editing the fuel & ignition maps (and most other normal tables and scalars) in the Stagea image using the R34 address file, because I've been doing essentially that myself over the last few days. Load up the Stagea address file, then the bin file for what's in my ECU, then an R34 bin as comparison, and looking to see where the differences are. As you'd expect, the two ECUs are essentially the same. Same ECU, same engine. Just a few differences in the ABS/TCS department.

But....because you can do that, it might be very easy for the tuner to use an R34 address file, load up an R34 bin file, then sync from the ECU and or/ sync to the ECU and perhaps cause havoc. Just because there are some differences.

Yeh well when Matt reprogrammed my board with the Stagea image, he was able to upload my current tune so I could just plug it back in and it was like nothing had changed. Except the misfire at about 5000rpm from the ECU pulling timing was gone.

But if the message hasn't been passed onto my tuner and he is trying to start with the R34 address file and then sync the bin file from the ECU, it wouldn't work as you said. But then I have no idea what he meant when he said it looks like it has earthed out, so I'm not sure.

This assembly should have some effects, With the device engaged the turbo gains faster response how ever the engine pins up top, with it disengaged the motor picks up 8 degrees of timing up top but loses big chunk of power band down low. So I want it to be engaged till about 20psi then slowly released after that point to gain the top end timing. That way we should have fat power band from start to end.

Your the man stao!

I'm keen to seen how this turns out. I have 2 friends who just acquired RB25s and hopefully will be looking for killer upgrades in time for production on these.

Hello, ive got a r33 s2 and wondering what is your best hi-flow turbo for response, only looking to make 220-250rwkw, stock internals with associated mods. Its a daily and would be looking to run between 10-14psi max.

cheers

Standard high flow would be suitable for your applications. I'm generally seeing around 240rwkws with option, how ever I'm recently seening some 260rwkws results based on 15psi from Toshi's remaps using stock injectors, afm and ecu.

So for your goal, get the standard high flow, then pm toshi for ecu flash and that should archeive it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I've done this both ways, I'd use the original loom & swap plugs on the engine side as you'll usually end up changing a lot of those anyway. Series 1 is usually non ABS which requires wiring which I can't remember how to do as haven't done it for over 15 years. The auto inhibitor is easy to bypass or in the meantime you can put it in neutral & unbolt it & tape it somewhere in the bay haha, then just wire reverse lights. I'd go straight to aftermarket ecu. A few basics are built in ignitor coils & reverse the CAS wiring, sort the plugs for whatever injectors & IAC-you can use an adaptor for the neo type otherwise the s1 will still work, use the knock sensors that suit the loom & it'll be pretty much running.  
    • This is for an RB20DET. Sorry for not including that. 
    • Welp, this is where my compression lands after my rebuild. Thoughts? I have ~6 hours on the motor. 
    • Well, after the full circus this week (new gearbag, 14 psi actuator on, injectors and AFM upgraded, and.....turbo repair) the diagnosis on the wastegate is in. It was broken. It was broken in a really strange way. The weld that holds the lever arm onto the wastegate flapper shaft broke. Broke completely, but broke in such a way that it could go back together in the "correct" position, or it could rearrange itself somewhere else along the fracture plane and sit with the flapper not parallel to the lever. So, who knows how and when exactly what happened? No-one will ever know. Was it broken like this the first time it spat the circlip and wedged itself deep into the dump? Or was it only broken when I tried to pry it back into place? (I didn't try that hard, but who knows?). Or did it break first? Or did it break between the first and second event of wierdness? Meh. It doesn't matter now. It is welded back together. And it is now held closed by a 14 psi actuator, so...the car has been tuned with the supporting mods (and the order of operations there is that the supporting mods and dyno needed to be able to be done first before adding boost, because it was pinging on <<14 psi with the new turbo with only a 6 psi actuator). And then tuned up a bit, and with the boost controller turned off throughout that process. So it was only running WG pressure and so only hit about 15-16 psi. The turbo is still ever so slightly lazier than might be preferred - like it is still a bit on the big side for the engine. I haven't tested it on the road properly in any way - just driven it around in traffic for a half hour or so. But it is like chalk and cheese compared to what it was. Between dyno numbers and driving feedback: It makes 100 kW at 3k rpm, which is OK, could be better. That's stock 2JZ territory, or RB20 with G series 550. It actually starts building boost from 2k, which is certainly better than it did recently (with all the WG flapper bullshit). Although it's hard to remember what it was like prior to all that - it certainly seems much, much better. And that makes sense, given the WG was probably starting to blow open at anything above about 3 psi anyway (with the 6 psi actuator). It doesn't really get to "full boost" (say 16 psi) until >>4k rpm. I am hopeful that this is a feature of the lack of boost controller keeping boost pressure off the actuator, because it was turned off for the dyno and off for the drives afterward. There's more to be found here, I'm sure. It made 230 rwkW at not a lot more than 6k and held it to over 7k, so there seems to be plenty of potential to get it up to 250-260rwkW with 18 psi or so, which would be a decent effort, considering the stock sized turbo inlet pipework and AFM, and the return flow cooler. According to Tao, those things should definitely put a bit of a limit on it by that sort of number. I must stress that I have not opened the throttle 100% on the road yet - well, at least not 100% and allowed it to wind all the way up. It'll have to wait until some reasonable opportunity. I'm quite looking forward to that - it feels massively better than it has in a loooong time. It's back to its old self, plus about 20% extra powers over the best it ever did before. I'm going to get the boost controller set up to maximise spool and settle at no more than ~17 psi (for now) and then go back on the dyno to see what we can squeeze out of it. There is other interesting news too. I put together a replacement tube to fit the R35 AFM in the stock location. This is the first time the tuner has worked with one, because anyone else he has tuned for has gone from Z32 territory to aftermarket ECU. No-one has ever wanted to stay Nistuned and do what I've done. Anyway, his feedback is that the R35 AFM is super super super responsive. Tiny little changes in throttle position or load turn up immediately as a cell change on the maps. Way, way more responsive than any of the old skool AFMs. Makes it quite diffifult to tune as you have to stay right on top of that so you don't wander off the cell you wanted to tune. But it certainly seems to help with real world throttle response. That's hard to separate from all the other things that changed, but the "pedal feel" is certainly crisp.
×
×
  • Create New...