Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

How does the wastegate open in that housing, is there enough clearance?

Its got 42mm of clearance inside the casing. thats far more then what the actuator can travel, won't case any issues.

gate.JPG

Bolted up my SS2 today. Didn't need to bend water lines. Nothing fouled. Oil drain fitted. Not sure if it was made to fit perfect or because it had a highflow previously it had already been modified.

Can't wait to kick it in the guts:)

Bolted up my SS2 today. Didn't need to bend water lines. Nothing fouled. Oil drain fitted. Not sure if it was made to fit perfect or because it had a highflow previously it had already been modified.

Can't wait to kick it in the guts:)

You lucky son of a....

I am so jealous of your simple install haha

Can't wait to see the power

The 350rwkws was made by a G2.5 in a type B rear housing on E85 internally gated. The G3 on type A internally gated housing made 358rwkws with 7 degrees regarded timing in fear of bending con-roads. It should be sitting around the 390rwkws mark with time added.

Now it is:

flangeold.jpg

With all broken studs removed of course.

2ndly before installation I found the actuator had been short lengthen to lower boost. Doing so leaves the wastegate unsealed causing massive amount of lag. And that is a lag caused by negligence. It must be held shut and loaded as photo shown on the right, do contact me for a lower psi actuator if lower boost is preferred for what ever reason, but don't unload the supplied actuator, it does not mean the same thing.

actuator.JPG

I will ask the customer tonight if he unwound the preload when he fitted it years ago.

So did u replace the entire rear housing? It looks like a different wastegate setup or is the picture mirrored

Hey Stao, what size banjo bolts do you use on your cores? I've just been looking through the HKS manual for my turbo and looks like mine are all M14 banjo bolts, hoping when I buy a turbo off you after my holidays I can simply unbolt mine and bolt yours on and just screw everything in

Will this be possible or will I just need to get an oil/water line kit off you?

that was the old housing been sand blasted, cleaned and reworked to Type B rear.

The picture must be mirrored then because the flapper arm is from a different angle and so is the t3 flange.

I asked him and he said he unloaded it as he asked for the 14psi actuator but got the 20. This car wasnt laggy for the setup he had.

The picture must be mirrored then because the flapper arm is from a different angle and so is the t3 flange.

I didnt notice that before, but yeh when you look at it everything is opposite haha

he asked for the 14psi actuator but got the 20.

This seems to happen to everyone...

Edited by Mitcho_7

Picked up my ATR43SS2 with .82 type B rear housing up off stao on monday XP Cant wait 2 get it installed on my 33 nd see how much power it makes..

I've fixed the photos. appears on the same way now. With the gate loaded and shut it should've pickedup another 200RPMs of response. Its been loaded now and hopefully there are some good tuners in NT.

Picked up my ATR43SS2 with .82 type B rear housing up off stao on monday XP Cant wait 2 get it installed on my 33 nd see how much power it makes..

Be good to see another result :) I'm hoping to lift my engine in mid next week. What actuator did you get?

There is a newer type of comp wheel been developed for the SS2 that weights about 25% less then the current SS2 billet wheel. (its virtually feels nothing on hand, less weight then the Plastic OEM comp wheel). I think Trent's is getting his dyno together next week and I'm testing that very soon. So I suggest to hold on to your SS2 units to have that comp wheel updated free of charge.

There is a newer type of comp wheel been developed for the SS2 that weights about 25% less then the current SS2 billet wheel. (its virtually feels nothing on hand, less weight then the Plastic OEM comp wheel). I think Trent's is getting his dyno together next week and I'm testing that very soon. So I suggest to hold on to your SS2 units to have that comp wheel updated free of charge.

You have my attention. Looking forward to checking it out. Which housing result will you be comparing it against?

you also have my attention, will you be testing it with a 0.63 rear housing or 0.82 housing? Im yet to put my SS2 in the car yet so i will wait to see if the gains are significant. But keen to get a Lighter comp wheel

This is a high flow that I've done for a set of Toyota supra with the SS1.5 CHRA. Come out pretty good. photos:

comp1.jpg

comp2.JPG

rear2.jpg

By specifications those two should be enough to flow 500rwkw+. Will post results once the customer get his car tuned.

Also this are stainless steel 3inch metal induction pipe made by Abe for R32/R33/R34 high flowed turbochargers. RRP is $200, or $150 with any turbocharger services purchased. PM if any one's interested.

intakepipe.jpg

Also this are stainless steel 3inch metal induction pipe made by Abe for R32/R33/R34 high flowed turbochargers. RRP is $200, or $150 with any turbocharger services purchased. PM if any one's interested.

intakepipe.jpg

These intakes can come with both recirc ports?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...