Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I've finally got some results sent in from our version of billet TD06SL2 off a S13 none VCT SR20det. It made 282rwkws on 18psi with E85 , it should just touch 300rwkws at full potential. This turbo is now available for $800 brand new for any one's interested. Far as I know the car has 264 cams with every thing else standard. And that is on a high mount T3 manifold externally gated.

billettd06.jpg

That is mental for a Sr20det man. I've never seen any thing been able to do that on a SR. Great work :thumbsup:

But, but, but.....like what? Actuators?

Little electronic parts sitting in a barrel of molten anger and butterfly valves with a constant flow of carbon deposit.

Problem? lol

Little electronic parts sitting in a barrel of molten anger and butterfly valves with a constant flow of carbon deposit.

Problem? lol

Don't be jealous just cos your car isn't going haha

Noooooo! no varex lol

i hate those things.. too much that could possibly screw up on them. keep it simply IMHO!

just buy a real exhaust, non of that homo varex shit, problem solved :)

if too quiet, add screamer lol

Don't be jealous just cos your car isn't going haha

just buy a real exhaust, non of that homo varex shit, problem solved :)

if too quiet, add screamer lol

LMAO see ^ man up Trev :nyaanyaa:

just buy a real exhaust, non of that homo varex shit, problem solved :)

if too quiet, add screamer lol

Obviously not in Vic.^^ Run a vented screamer or loud system down here and you will get anal raped by the cops, making you the homo.

Varex mufflers work surprisingly well to quieted the exhaust, and can be made instantly silent when required. I have had no issues with mine and any problems I have heard from others were resolved by Xforce quickly.

As far as power goes, this 3.5 inch Varex muffler made 30kw more than the 3.5 inch Hooker muffler I had on last, due to the Hooker having a 3 inch internal restriction. The Varex is also much quieter with the flap open. Stop bashing a product you clearly know nothing about guys.

Obviously not in Vic.^^ Run a vented screamer or loud system down here and you will get anal raped by the cops, making you the homo.

Varex mufflers work surprisingly well to quieted the exhaust, and can be made instantly silent when required. I have had no issues with mine and any problems I have heard from others were resolved by Xforce quickly.

As far as power goes, this 3.5 inch Varex muffler made 30kw more than the 3.5 inch Hooker muffler I had on last, due to the Hooker having a 3 inch internal restriction. The Varex is also much quieter with the flap open. Stop bashing a product you clearly know nothing about guys.

I didn't directly bash the product, what I was implying is that why have a loud exhaust that has the option to make it quiet again robbing power?

My point was get a nice quiet exhaust with a decent mid muffler and rear muffler and if that is too quiet running a screamer so you only hear noise on song.

Screamers are a defect in most states, I am aware of that. But then again most of us don't really drive hard on the street so you won't even hear it.

I'm pretty sure red is work in progress, I appears some thing didn't go according to plan all runs was backed off at around 6000RPMs. perhaps the owner of the car can add some additional information.

Wow only just realised it noses over at 6k

Add: Trent mentioned it is a stock engine and didn't want to push too much power out of it, so timing was backed off up top for better reliability or its going to hit 300rwkws.

Stop bashing a product you clearly know nothing about guys.

Am not bashing either, simply gave my own opinion. I don't like them because there are too many things that could (potentially) go wrong, for that reason I like to keep it simple.

Everyone knows they work, and plenty of people are happy with them. Just not my cup of tea as stated.

Well it was done but cos I dropped the car off before Sean got there and we didn't chat he set boost to 18psi max and very safe. Only made 340hp but he told me to ignore the number as he can never reproduce Hp numbers that hypergear customers expect. So I drove home and gave it a couple squirts and it feels good. Maybe it was similar power but just low reading dyno...until I compared my result to previous results and it seems lazy on boost. Might need more preload. So thinking of taking it back after doing the exhaust and Sean said we can try put 21+ down its throat

Any other thoughts? Mine is red

Power

photo_zpsfe9a9fae.jpg

Boost

photo_zps4956dc8c.jpg

What's with the primary school text book?

His printer almost out of ink so waiting for email copies to cone through. That was something I did earlier to decide if I would send my original SS2 back to Stao for updates...which I did

It looks alright for the boost level given considering its only at 16psi peak, and the most it can make out of stock exhaust manifold internally gated is 280rwkws, I would use a EBC to increase boost level, also double check with exhaust on and off pre-cat.

That was with Ebc. The max doesn't really worry me that much but up to 4000 it's much less boost than all other ss2's. Hopefully just preload or exhaust

Edited by t_revz

Refer to my E85 result on a milled out stock exhaust manifold.

ss2stdmanifoldpower.jpg

ss2stdmanifoldboost.jpg

If you take 40kws out of that been the 98 result then that would make it just under 280rwkws. and I'm sure the manifold that I've used had much more porting done. Try and have a play with the actuator pre-loading, drop the exhaust, and run abit more boost through it, and you should get just around there.

Alternatively get a brae exhaust manifold and ex gate setup. Picks up 30kws straight on less boost. Refer to page 299.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...