Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Driver fail.

Pretty much! I'm sure it has the potential to break into the 12's.

One day when im bored i might get hold of some stock rear shockies and dampers. Instead of either bogging down or lighting the tyres up every time, it might absorb some of the initial shock and grip a little better.

I need to also get some new bushes for my diff, helps with dreaded axle tramp apparently. I know for sure one of them are knackered.

Years ago my sil180 with 230rwkws got up to 13.4sec quarter driven by dr drift.

I'm no expert, Just personal experiences, need avoid that big wheel spin in 2nd going fast , ease a little throttle actually get better acceleration time. I got a D-box, its a very good toy for practice launches and quarters.

2ndly a proper manifold and ex gate setup would help heaps with up top torque, I felt that straight way after installation, will pick up more HP too. That top end torque would definitely help getting better times.

Also BB research is so far at a level that I'm pretty confident with. I have 2 more sets of bearings and can convert any G series to rollers for $200. in case of failure I will refund the $200 price difference and rebuild it back into brass bearings. Please let me know if interesting in trailing.

The wheelspin into 2nd won't really affect trap speeds though, if anything the heavier throttle/looser my runs the better the trap speed - big bogs were the main thing that seemed to cost me mph

Yep I also think a slippery launch still nets decent MPH, bogging out is more likely to cost you speed than spinning a little.

Stao does $200 also apply to my SS1PU?

Usually if you take off faster or your 60ft is lower your trap speeds will be lower

The shitter you take off bad launch high 60ft will net you higher trap speeds Aslong as you don't miss any gears and are flat foot till the end

Further updates:

Today I've trailed our SS1PU and Roller bearing SS2. Both Externally gated and E85 Results are below.

SS1PU maxed out at 322rwkws with peek boost of 20psi. This turbo is super responsive as usual.

power.jpg

boost.jpg

The Roller bearing SS2. I believe This is probably the best turbocharger that with the perfect balance of power and response for a stock Rb25det. brilliant on road driveability. It maxed at 374rwkws with 22psi of boost.

power.jpg

boost.jpg

We compared few runs against it including our new ATR-SL20.5G, 25.5G, as well as Bush V BB. Will upload bit later.

Awesome results Stao

How do these compare to the Ceramic bearing turbos?

Also let me know about that oil feed fitting from the block to turbo :) Might need it in the next 2 weeks :D

Compare to the older ball bearing setup, the difference in oil drag won't make enough differences that can be picked up by the dyno. I would call the latest more reliable, as harmonic vibration separation has taken into account. means the shaft harmonics is not affected by engine harmonics while both are spinning at high speed. I've spent many late nights and time getting that working.

89cal: The engine fitting has been sent. See how it goes, send it back for upgrade if there are any issues.

This is SS2 Ball Bearing V SS2 bush bearing. Please note today's dyno run used an proper externally gated setup while the older run had an external gate plumb back setup. There shouldn't be any differences in top end assume both runs are based on the same setup. On the same time, evidence in differences between plumb back and atmospheric ventilation.

vsbushpower.jpg

vsbushboost.jpg

GTScott: Sorry won't be able to BB SS1PU, make no differences either way.

Reading below contains the ATRSL220.5G, SS1PU, STDSL220G, and SS2BB.

powervsall.jpg

boostvsall.jpg

What were the rear housing size differences and what fuel?

The ATRSL20.5/25.5/STDSL220G are all based in a 10CM turbine

SS1PU is in a .86 turbine

SS2BB is in a .82 turbine.

All on externally gated setup with E85 Fuel.

I just got my Hi Flow turbo finally delivered, how much shaft play should there be?

I'm used to buy new turbo's, so used to almost zero, I'mm getting pretty much 1mm of side movement, not even the old RB20 turbo I have sitting here has that much, nor the VG30 BB one here either.

Maybe once it's had some oil through it and run up it will change, but it sounds awfully noisy moving the wheel around!

*edit

Ran some Moreys oil stabiliser through the oil feed and sealed it up to stand for a bit, seems to flow a lot better with less movement, forgot a bush bearing uses oil to basically centralise it and float on.

Cary on !

Edited by Brett_J

Yes when they are assembled brand new the bearings are dry. Once oil goes in it will be fine.

This is some modifications done to a G3 compressor housings that is made to accelerate the discharge velocity. Will do some trail on that soon as long with roller bearing assembly.

comp.JPG

Photo of SS2 High flowed into M35'S VQ25 turbocharger with 38mm internal wastegate.

comp.JPG

turbine.JPG

comp.JPG

^^^^^

Updates on the G3 profile. I've done a trail run with the G3 today using compressor assembly above with roller bearing cartridge I have to say it is amazing. the response is at least 300RPMs more advanced with heaps better throttle response. Any one with a current G3 in Melbourne is more then welcome for a test drive.

Will be hitting the dyno next week for an comparative run against original G3. Once done I will be happy to swap it with a current G3 customer at no cost.

Will be hitting the dyno next week for an comparative run against original G3. Once done I will be happy to swap it with a current G3 customer at no cost.

:action-smiley-069: does G2.5 count? more then happy to swing by for hyper wagon fun this weekend. You be working?

For the G2.5/PU high flow I can only mod it into roller bearings but this comp profile is only suitable for G3.

The new G3 has a different comp housing profile. made to accelerate the discharging velocity, I can definitely feel the differences on road. The effects of it on top end power band is unsure so will hit Trents for one more dyno run.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...