Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Also, can i get a rollcall on who is using what dump pipes with their turbos. I was using a (very old) JJR Bellmouth with an internal gate SS2 and the wastgate flap was fouling on the dump.

Thinking about buying the same thing again, but want to see what others are running, as smoe form of boost control would be great :)

Your exhaust is fine and is making good power. No need to change it. Unless the new one glows in dark.

Yeah, should be able to do that. I have a track day this Thursday, so if nothing blows up, I'll be in.

Car was originally tuned at Unigroup (290 as well- their dynos are identical I've found from personal experience), however I use DVS Jez, and has been to him quite a bit. Stock S14 motor, incld headgasket. GTX3071R 0.82 housing, 6Boost, 44mm Tial. 289kw@18psi on 98.

Lets go and see what they do, if I make it through the gearbox! :P

That is a awesome power figure and only 18psi boost on 98 should be very safe and easier on the box with the .82 rear

How did you find drivability wize going from Unigroup to dvsjez? I'm tuned at Unigroup now

If you went with a .63 rear and more boost and e85 would be very different to drive but may be abit harsh on the driveline as the .82 will be slighty laggier

I do welcome discussions about SR20dets as I'm learning about it my self.

Here is the dyno reading form the S14 I've just bought, with a GT3071 turbocharger appears to be in a .64 T2x turbine:

power.jpg

The response on paper is bit better then I anticipated. Its made 22psi by 4300RPMs.

boost.jpg

Very little power for the amount of boost given. Its lake of down low torque, drives like a NA most of time. The sheet does how that which makes 120kws on 4000RPMs. Same power with 300RPMs better in response would be nice.

Other funny thing about this S14 is it appears that they've hidden all the electrical wiring. There are no wiring or fuse boxes any where inside this engine bay. Electrical work would a nightmare.

I'm modifying my factory Rb25det exhaust manifold at moment for external gating, how ever it will be externally gated on two different spots of which I think been the highest pressure points. Will upload photos once its done and be interested to see how much difference in power I might be losing from the Brae high mount with a factory bolton version of SS4 Alpha turbocharger.

I was running an X-Force 3" Bellmouth dump with my HKS turbo, never had an issue with it. Its now been chopped/modified to a v-band and wastegate plumbed in.

Car sounds so awesome on the new engine, its not just turbo noise all the time like it was with the HKS turbo, sounds raw engine, love it. The SS2 is so much quieter driving around off boost, I've only hit about 3psi so far as I've only tuned it enough to just get it places, but I think its going to sound/go pretty good at 24ish psi :)

Got a 4" intake made up today, its a bit busy around the exhaust side of the engine. Few more things to sort out but should be getting tuned in early January:

20131209_182315_zpstgx4htjl.jpg

The turbo outlet silicone hose will burn quickly if you let it like that. :(

I've seen some setup on SR with a silicone hose close to the exhaust manifold like yours, and the hose never lasted long.

Lol did you know it was like that or found out after trying to tune?

Looks like your car has had a big rear ender.

Nah it was fine when it was tuned. Had a car transport company move my car and this is how I get it back from them. Not sure how they managed it, bunch of special people.

The turbo outlet silicone hose will burn quickly if you let it like that. :(

 

I've seen some setup on SR with a silicone hose close to the exhaust manifold like yours, and the hose never lasted long.

Yeah think we are going to change it to a steel pipe with straight joiners

Ive done that once before with my dumpipe lol backing out of a driveway and the runner the electric gate runs on my flange caught it and completey bend the dumpipe at both those bends just like yours haha.

Id suggest getting a 90 degree elbow welded off the housing 89cal

Edited by methz

Nah it was fine when it was tuned. Had a car transport company move my car and this is how I get it back from them. Not sure how they managed it, bunch of special people.

Reversed the car and caught the exhaust on something..

The fact it actually bent like that indicates the pipe was pretty hot when it made contact, and also that it was quite an impact. Indicates to me your car was doing burnouts, lost control and went backward over something that got caught on the exhaust.

Let this be a note to anyone having a car moved by transport; you MUST have a 'mechanic' limit put in for such reasons. Something that drops the rev limit to 3,000 or similar. Or pull the AFM earth out of the plug. It will be too hard for them to work out and will make the car run in limp mode.

Id suggest getting a 90 degree elbow welded off the housing 89cal

This i have recently found out :P And will be doing the same!

I always keep a few 90 degree silicon bends in the garage for this very reason lol. but also depends on manifold design and how close runner 1 is tucked into the collector.

I had the same design dumpipe gtscott its just got weak points and is cheaply made. I was reversing and wasn't going fast or was the dumpipe hot at the time.

Edited by methz

Lol didnt see that coming.

The jjr is ok. Need to die-grind their dump flange abit. From memory it didnt match up with factory gasket.

I do welcome discussions about SR20dets as I'm learning about it my self.

Here is the dyno reading form the S14 I've just bought, with a GT3071 turbocharger appears to be in a .64 T2x turbine:

Posted Image

The response on paper is bit better then I anticipated. Its made 22psi by 4300RPMs.

Posted Image

Very little power for the amount of boost given. Its lake of down low torque, drives like a NA most of time. The sheet does how that which makes 120kws on 4000RPMs. Same power with 300RPMs better in response would be nice.

Getting the VCt to work and std manifold back on will bring back that 300rpms or more response should be more around 200rwkw at 4000rpm

But remember the sr20 is not like the rb25 with 2 less cylinders

Lol didnt see that coming.

The jjr is ok. Need to die-grind their dump flange abit. From memory it didnt match up with factory gasket.

I have had them hitting under the floor too, I would say their jig was bent at various times and they just kept pumping them out. I guess for the price you can't complain.

Lol didnt see that coming.

The jjr is ok. Need to die-grind their dump flange abit. From memory it didnt match up with factory gasket.

I just purchased one today, so hopefully it only requires minimal modification.

Yeah I've got JJR too, it's fine. I had the workshop to shave back the flange as per these instructions, and also had a flexi join installed just after the bottom bend as the mid muffler scrapes every now and then and I don't want to wreck the turbo. Works well.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...