Jump to content
SAU Community

Hypergear Turbochargers and High flow Services Development thread


Recommended Posts

3. Are aftermarket intake pipes needed for any of the above? Would prefer to stick with the stock rubber hoses.

Basically yes. Some people get away with it, most don't at those kinds of power levels (they warp/ or suck shut).

Beyond that is that you will get better flow/power with an intake pipe.

Edited by jjman
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are the standard rubber hose reinforced with a spring inside ?

If the hose collapse under load you can say goodbye to you turbo and possibly the engine as well.

The turbo will overspin dangerously to maintain target boost pressure, possibly getting in the surge zone, and it will leak really badly from the compressor seal leading to knock.

Hard pipe for the intake is always a good thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm using a 3 inch metal induction pipe that is clamped onto the factory air box.

OP6 high flowed turbocharger. Standard turbo profile:

fronts.jpg

Here are all the results labeled:

op6powerall.jpg

op6boostall.jpg

I was unable to run any more boost beyond 22psi with internal gate. How ever had no issues doing 24psi external.

Power wise compare internal v external was 25kws. note the back to back run on 19psi.

I'm very confident that this high flowed turbocharger will do 385rwkws on the Brae high mount manifold externally gated.

Even tho this is a remarkable gain from modifying a factory exhaust manifold. How ever, running the same turbocharger with a proper high mount will gain bit more power and much better top end torque.

The gain over internal gate by fitting external gate on factory exhaust manifold in this case is: 7.24%

While the gain over internal gate by fitting external gate on turbine housing is: 1.5%

Reference of Internal gate V external gate on turbine housing:

Solid red = internal gate

Dotted red = external gate off turbine housing

boost.JPG

power2.JPG

And if any one wants their manifold to be done. The cost for doing so is $300 and our 50mm HPVA gates are $350 in additional.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Apart from the turbocharger and gate.

I have:

450L/H Fuel pump

1200 cc injectors

Adaptronic plug in ECU

3inch turbo back exhaust

600x300x75mm cooler kit

My engine is forged with CP 1:9 pistons, Super tech valve springs and valve sets.

Your stock engine is fine for up to 20psi mark which is about 350rwkws on paper.

To build this turbocharger I will need a donor turbo from a R34 with a OP6 rear housing.

Back to the high flowing topic. The current profiled OP6 turbocharger should be pretty close reaching 300rwkws on a internally gated setup with pump 98 Fuel. And good enough for 350rwkws working with a proper high mount externally gated setup running E85.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are these silicone intake pipes any better than stock? or will they still suck shut on a highflow @ 200rwkw

http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/261146335739?ssPageName=STRK:MEWAX:IT&_trksid=p3984.m1438.l2649

At 200rwkw I doubt the standard one would suck shut. That silicone one wouldn't be much better than standard I bet. Possibly a bit better but if you want to run higher boost I'd like the piece of mind of a solid intake

Edited by Marcus89
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stock induction pipe will suck shut.

You can make a hard induction pipe out of couple of silicon joiners like:

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/261613-hypergear-hiflow-service-continued/page-89

or you can pm M35scotty for his induction pipe which allow factory bov and breather plumbings.

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/261613-hypergear-hiflow-service-continued/page-288

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are these silicone intake pipes any better than stock? or will they still suck shut on a highflow @ 200rwkw

...

At 200rwkw I doubt the standard one would suck shut. That silicone one wouldn't be much better than standard I bet. Possibly a bit better but if you want to run higher boost I'd like the piece of mind of a solid intake

I had no trouble whatsoever with the R34 OEM rubber intake pipe @ 199rwkw. Then again, I think a highflow should take you beyond 200rwkw fairly easily?

I'm now running Scotty's intake pipe @ 257rwkw, it looks good and works great.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks guys.

The stock one can start to collapse not much over 200kw, but it only happens when the manifold is glowing. The lower section of the intake isn't protected well from the radiated heat and it softens the rubber/silicone. You can slide a piece of 3 inch stainless inside the corrugated section to help, but the lower bend will still suck in at around 250kw from my experience. Changing to an alloy intake solves most issues, but it would need the BOV return and breather fitting to remain legal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks guys.

The stock one can start to collapse not much over 200kw, but it only happens when the manifold is glowing. The lower section of the intake isn't protected well from the radiated heat and it softens the rubber/silicone. You can slide a piece of 3 inch stainless inside the corrugated section to help, but the lower bend will still suck in at around 250kw from my experience. Changing to an alloy intake solves most issues, but it would need the BOV return and breather fitting to remain legal.

yeah, similarly mine made it to 207rwkw. but then at 220rwkw it was sucking shut intermittently. Bitch of a thing not knowing when ur going to get power or if the power is going to nose over above 4500rpm...

just the replacement alloy intake pipe alone freed up another 8rwhp.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I looked at compound system few years ago. The original compound Diesel system for a truck which is by turbocharging a smaller turbo with a large turbo, Not sure if it would work on a high performance petrol system.

There are two things doesn't look right for petrol.

1. Exhaust side

Exhaust manifold mounts to the exhaust housing of the smaller turbocharger.

The outlet of the smaller turbocharger's turbine housing goes to the inlet of the large turbocharger.

2. Induction side

Outlet of the large turbocharger force feed smaller turbocharger's inlet,

out let of the smaller turbocharger goes to the intercooler.

Put them together we have:

Big compressor of turbocharger two, with small turbine end of turbocharger one.

Unless there is a way which turbocharger one can increase its flow capacity to suit turbocharger two's compressor when needed. I think its going to make the engine pin.

Also if photo above is based on a RB25det using a Compound turbo system, then I think the SS2 Alpha have made better power band.

Other alternative for huge power with stock response is by using a welly tuned sequential twin system. I do have drawings to make that work and is probably the next thing on the trail list. Its going to get very expansive how ever, and I'm not sure how things might be fitted under the bonnet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I looked at compound system few years ago. The original compound Diesel system for a truck which is by turbocharging a smaller turbo with a large turbo, Not sure if it k on a high performance petrol system.

There are two things doesn't look right for petrol.

1. Exhaust side

Exhaust manifold mounts to the exhaust housing of the smaller turbocharger.

The outlet of the smaller turbocharger's turbine housing goes to the inlet of the large turbocharger.

2. Induction side

Outlet of the large turbocharger force feed smaller turbocharger's inlet,

out let of the smaller turbocharger goes to the intercooler.

Put them together we have:

Big compressor of turbocharger two, with small turbine end of turbocharger one.

Unless there is a way which turbocharger one can increase its flow capacity to suit turbocharger two's compressor when needed. I think its going to make the engine pin.

Also if photo above is based on a RB25det using a Compound turbo system, then I think the SS2 Alpha have made better power band.

Thats because the picture I posted was of a ebay t70 with a s15 t28 as the small turbo vs just the ebay t70. Went from 1 bar at 4500 to 1 bar at 3000. With better turbos it would be a lot better. Ofcourse the results arent earth shattering but what do you expect from a build made from bits lying around the workshop.

Other alternative for huge power with stock response is by using a welly tuned sequential twin system. I do have drawings to make that work and is probably the next thing on the trail list. Its going to get very expansive how ever, and I'm not sure how things might be fitted under the bonnet.

Compound turbo has been done many times on petrol engines and workes very well. Just ask kevin jewer how his 8 second dsm was spooling a 80mm BW Turbo by 4500rpm on a 2l four banger. An ss2 with an atr46 would be awesome. I will be going forward with mine as soon as my new engine is in.

Apologies in advance for bad spelling etc im on my phone :-p

Edited by Super Drager
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought the 'best" way would be to have a turbo outlet force feed into a roots/screw type charger inlet, then the charger outlet into the intercooler.

At least in my crazy fantasy world

Not crazy at all. A guy on PF did it to an RB2530 in a VL. Absolute torque monster and massive power everywhere, even with relatively low boost setting on each of the blower and the wastegate. Large turbine housing means low backpressure, but blower means boost from idle, so response is stilll good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all, I need to get this HKS SLD attached to my stock ECU because I've now got the German autobahn and faster European circuits to contend with.  The car is a manual 2dr ER34 with an AT ECU and I've realised the AT ECU has two pins for speed sensor signals: Pin 29: Vehicle speed sensor signal (Vehicle speed sensor 2) Pin *58: Output shaft rotation sensor signal (Vehicle speed sensor 1) - *RB25DET A/T model only Before I go butchering this harness, is anyone sure of which pin is the correct one for signal adjustment? The attached document from HKS indicates pin 29 but I found this situation mentioned in the following thread on a different forum (R34 GTT Auto Trans Speed Cut Problem | Zerotohundred) mentioning pin 58 needing to be altered by member zephuros, albeit it seems to be for an RSM-GP and the info appears to be old.  R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-2.pdf R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-3.pdf R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-1.pdf HKS SLD Vehicle Pin out P59-P70 ER34-pages.pdf
    • Embrace the freedom of casual encounters on the best dating app in town! Verified Maidens Superlative Сasual Dating
    • Slimline sub on the rear parcel shelf is doable. Pioneer TS-WX140DA is only 70mm high.   
    • People like Johnny Dose Bro might be laughing at my post because I accidentally added 100mm to my numbers. 350-355 is indeed the lower limit. 450 is off-road Skyline spec.
    • What is the "compromise" that you think will happen? Are you thinking that something will get damaged? The only things you have to be concerned about with spherical jointed suspension arms are; Arguments with the constabulary wrt their legality (they are likely to be illegal for road use without an engineering certificatation, and that may not be possible to obtain). A lot more NVH transmitted through to the passengers (which is hardly a concern for those with a preference for good handling, anyway). Greatly increased inspection and maintenance requirements (see above points, both).   It is extremely necessary to ask what car you are talking about. Your discussion on strut tops, for example, would be completely wrong for an R chassis, but be correct for an S chassis. R32s have specific problems that R33/4 do not have. Etc. I have hardened rubber bushes on upper rear control arms and traction rods. Adjustable length so as to be able to set both camber and bump steer. You cannot contemplate doing just the control arms and not the traction arms. And whatever bushing you have in one you should have in the other so that they have similar characteristics. Otherwise you can get increased oddness of behaviour as one bushing flexes and the other doesn't, changing the alignment between them. I have stock lower rear arms with urethane bushes. I may make changes here, these are are driven by the R32's geometry problems, so I won't discuss them here unless it proves necessary. I have spherical joints in the front caster rods. I have experienced absolutely no negatives and only positives from doing so. They are massively better than any other option. I have sphericals in the FUCAs, but this is driven largely by the (again) R32 specific problems with the motion of those arms. I just have to deal with the increased maintenance required. Given how much better the front end behaves with the sphericals in there.....I'd probably be tempted to go away from my preference (which is not to have sphericals on a road car, for 2 of the 3 reasons in the bulleted list above), just to gain those improvements. And so my preference for not using sphericals (in general) on a road car should be obvious. I use them judiciously, though, as required to solve particular problems.
×
×
  • Create New...