Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Evo 8 stock block

Fic 1120 cc injectors

Deatchwerks 300 fuel pump rewired

Caltex eflex

K&n panel filter std airbox

Ces racing exhaust turbo back split dump pipe screamer

Gsc s1 cams

Hypergear slss2 hi flow evo 9 turbo 25.5 psi 4400-4500rpm

SLSS2 is making 285AWKWs so far. I think it will stop making power just under 300awkws at 29psi.

285awkw.jpg

Stao what about run a big compressor wheel in a small turbine housing then use a large internal waste gate to compensate heat and flow? I have seen few turbos from Euro cars been made that way like the Audi K03 and K04. Might be a good thing to try on.

They only work with low boost level applications, some thing under 16psi would work great. The compressor and turbine end must be welly balanced. As in the back pressure needs to be similar to boost pressure so forces generated naturalizes.

At moment with the SR its matter of evaluating different wheels and housings for some data. Once the limitation of compressor and turbine is determined, I can then mix-match or make some thing very specifically to suit either end of the turbocharger. That way I have a balance flowed turbocharger that makes good power for its response and last.

SLSS2 is making 285AWKWs so far. I think it will stop making power just under 300awkws at 29psi.

285awkw.jpg

So this is the turbo I bought for my 2.3 stroker evo Stao? I was hoping for a little more than that... :P

Stao,

have there been any updates for the CT12a turbos, one of mine pissed its pant suit on the way to work this morning.

Just looking at options at this stage...Is it possible for you to supply a manifold, gate and TD06 or similar turbo to suit a 1J?

Thanks

Zeb

For reversed turbine wheels there sin't that much of option yet available. Need to see what I can find.

KAMAK make a 9 blade SL2 wheel, I believe they call it their STS wheel. Why don't you guys try this? No machine work required, just assemble and balance.

Its meant to be a much lighter wheel, too. It has the potential for very snappy throttle response with the billet compressor.

We can high flow them and they will be good enough to support 300rwkws on a manual with supporting mods. Lot of work is involved in doing it how ever. So it might be working out cheaper with an high mount, but depending on what it is.

The cost to high flow both CT12As is $1800 and they needs braided oil and water lines after high flowing.

Alternatively, you can use our ATR43G3, SS2 or SS3 depending on what sort of power you are after. G3 is $900, while SS2/3 is $1150. 50mm HPVA gate that Ive been using on the R33 is $300 with the turbocharger. and Brae manifold is $1100.

KAMAK make a 9 blade SL2 wheel, I believe they call it their STS wheel. Why don't you guys try this? No machine work required, just assemble and balance.

Its meant to be a much lighter wheel, too. It has the potential for very snappy throttle response with the billet compressor.

There not reverse rotation only very few people sell reverse rotation turbines in the us

There not reverse rotation only very few people sell reverse rotation turbines in the us

Kamak definitely make a 9 blade reverse TD06SL2, just need to ask.

Need to ask brae on this. Usually about weekish.

Cool

So, If I said I want a turbo with a big midrange, going on to make around the 300rwkw mark on 98 what would you suggest? the SS2?

Would be after something with a V-band dump pipe set up preferably.

The SS2 would be the most reliable turbo for this setup. The externally gated version usually comes with a Plate which a 3 inch metal pipe can be attached to as the font pipe. Or a Vband assembly extension that cost $100 additional.

details are at:

http://www.hypergearturbos.com/index.php?route=product/product&path=72&product_id=54

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Please ignore I found the right way of installing it thanks
    • There are advantages, and disadvantages to remapping the factory.   The factory runs billions of different maps, to account for sooooo many variables, especially when you bring in things like constantly variable cams etc. By remapping all those maps appropriately, you can get the car to drive so damn nicely, and very much so like it does from the factory. This means it can utilise a LOT of weird things in the maps, to alter how it drives in situations like cruise on a freeway, and how that will get your fuel economy right down.   I haven't seen an aftermarket ECU that truly has THAT MANY adjustable parameters. EG, the VAG ECUs are somewhere around 2,000 different tables for it to work out what to do at any one point in time. So for a vehicle being daily driven etc, I see this as a great advantage, but it does mean spending a bit more time, and with a tuner who really knows that ECU.   On the flip side, an aftermarket ECU, in something like a weekender, or a proper race car, torque based tuning IMO doesn't make that much sense. In those scenarios you're not out there hunting down stuff like "the best way to minimise fuel usage at minor power so that we can go from 8L/100km to 7.3L/100km. You're more worried about it being ready to make as much freaking power as possible when you step back on the loud pedal as you come out of turn 2, not waiting the extra 100ms for all the cams to adjust etc. So in this scenario, realistically you tune the motor to make power, based on the load. People will then play with things like throttle response, and drive by wire mapping to get it more "driveable".   Funnily enough, I was watching something Finnegans Garage, and he has a huge blown Hemi in a 9 second 1955 Chev that is road registered. To make it more driveable on the road recently, they started testing blocking up the intake with kids footballs, to effectively reduce air flow when they're on the road, and make the throttle less touchy and more driveable. Plus some other weird shit the yankee aftermarket ECUs do. Made me think of Kinks R34...
    • I do this, I also don't get the joke  
    • Return flow cooler will be killing you I reckon. You can certainly push more through a low mount setup but they're good numbers for a stock looking engine bay.  Mine made 345rwkw (hub) at 22psi on 98 with a "highflow" on a stock manifold but it's a long way from a normal high flow or standard engine. I used one of those Turbosmart IWG-75's and it was great with the Motec running closed loop boost with pressure being applied to both sides of the diaphragm. 
    • Hey man do you have pic of adaptor plate by any chance I need to match up the bolt holes as my gearbox adaptor plate ones are way off the only bolts of starter motor are matching thanks 
×
×
  • Create New...