Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just got word, my retune @20 pound got 417hp atw with the SS2 on e85

Up from 370hp atw with previous 16 pound tune

(Hub dyno)

Will get the graph up later today.

Edited by jay-rod

Ok so the 28SS-2 turbine with the 64mm comp wheel sounds about 99% exactly what i'm after, just wonder what if any effect the 11 blade turbine does to flow and inertia V the 9 blade with slotting two extra blades in the same space

I just sold the -7s so would this be something you can supply as a complete unit in -5 housings or would i need to source the housings

Late to the party,but re the return flow cooler turbos vs non return.

When people say it hasnt affected them.

Is it just because the hypergear stuff is being dynoed and dynoed on specific motors and is targeted for a specific purpose that the resulting pressure drop shifted the compressor out of the sweet spot of the map.

Hes then reworked it to shift it back taking into account that.

Whereas a aftermarket turbo built not for a specific purpose has a different map

And by chance /luck or design is less affected about being put on a different spot on its compressor map

Cheers

Darren

Case in point being the gtx wheels work at highpressure ratios

Maybe a gtx3076 can take the hit of being shifted across the map and the only

Result is a higher intake air temp but not enough to skew the numbers to

Much

Cheers

Darren

Late to the party,but re the return flow cooler turbos vs non return.

When people say it hasnt affected them.

Is it just because the hypergear stuff is being dynoed and dynoed on specific motors and is targeted for a specific purpose that the resulting pressure drop shifted the compressor out of the sweet spot of the map.

Hes then reworked it to shift it back taking into account that.

Whereas a aftermarket turbo built not for a specific purpose has a different map

And by chance /luck or design is less affected about being put on a different spot on its compressor map

Cheers

Darren

I think the high kilometer Neo engine with more chamber squish and plenty of built up carbon deposits is causing the det, it probably has little to do with the cooler which is likely working as hard as it can.

The whole 'lets guess a compressor design and trial it' has to have the odd failure rate too. You are probably correct that the original turbo is out of efficiency for this particular setup.

Other than that, the new turbo making 300wkw on 98 isn't a bad thing, most would be happy with that result, even using a more expensive GT3076. If it were me I would have left the Blitz return flow seeing most of his customers will be wanting to run it anyway. There aren't many other off the shelf cooler options for the 34, not without hacking holes at least.

The ATR43G4 SAT has been trailed on two cars, and from previous reading it is holding 27psi perfect flat before the cooler, its not a case of a compressor losing efficiency at high shaft speed that case boost tapering. Getting that volume of air into the engine is the problem.

Now, the 600x300x100mm cooler it now fitted and I have picked up 3psi pushing it from 292rwkws to 313rwkws, got better response and allow one degree of extra timing. But there is still a 5psi drop.

The cooler it self is also been used on my GTR, that shown no boost drop across the core. The problem will be either in all the bents of the pipings or if there is a leak or issue on the inlet manifold of the car.

Over 2G has been spent in to investigation, and this has never been experienced before on any of my other cars. None further turbocharger evaluations could be conducted, so I'm not stopping till its sorted. I'll weld vacuum nipples at different bents of the cooler piping and monitor drops from individual points.

The problem will be either in all the bents of the pipings or if there is a leak or issue on the inlet manifold of the car.

Forget the piping, it's fine for much more. Surely you pressure tested the intake to check for leaks? The plenum gaskets are renowned for leaking between the halves when the engine gets hot...

What's the exhaust like? Does it run a cat? Is one of the mufflers restricted?

The stock BOV leaks badly at that boost. There is a few PSI gained from swapping to a Turbosmart Kompact which would lower the shaft speed.

Cooler change:

P98 fuel. Blue lines are with blitz cooler, The red/gold lines are from new cooler. Nothing has been changed apart from the cooler. Its hitting 200rwkws @ 4000RPM as well. Pretty good to drive. I will do a pressure test and see what comes up.

atr45sat311rwkwnewcooler.jpg

atr45sat311rwkwnewcoolerboost.jpg

I also got a print of John reco's R33, thats the first time I had a proper look at his result. It is running our standard 21U high flow on E85 fuel, and I'm amazed of how responsive it is.

reco21uhf310rwkwe85.jpgreco21uhf310rwkwe85boost.jpg

  • Like 1

Catching up with the return flow cooler topic. Theoretically vacuum pressure at one point of exit is identical to all points of exit. I'm leaning towards manifold or gasket leaks and etc. On the same time your big cooler worked well. 1psi = 20kws :blink: can't wait to see what it does at 24psi. :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Or just put in a 1JZ, and sell me the NEO head 😎
    • Oh, it's been done. You just run a wire out there and back. But they have been known to do coolant temp sensors, MAP sensors, etc. They're not silly (at Regency Park) and know what's what with all the different cars.
    • Please ignore I found the right way of installing it thanks
    • There are advantages, and disadvantages to remapping the factory.   The factory runs billions of different maps, to account for sooooo many variables, especially when you bring in things like constantly variable cams etc. By remapping all those maps appropriately, you can get the car to drive so damn nicely, and very much so like it does from the factory. This means it can utilise a LOT of weird things in the maps, to alter how it drives in situations like cruise on a freeway, and how that will get your fuel economy right down.   I haven't seen an aftermarket ECU that truly has THAT MANY adjustable parameters. EG, the VAG ECUs are somewhere around 2,000 different tables for it to work out what to do at any one point in time. So for a vehicle being daily driven etc, I see this as a great advantage, but it does mean spending a bit more time, and with a tuner who really knows that ECU.   On the flip side, an aftermarket ECU, in something like a weekender, or a proper race car, torque based tuning IMO doesn't make that much sense. In those scenarios you're not out there hunting down stuff like "the best way to minimise fuel usage at minor power so that we can go from 8L/100km to 7.3L/100km. You're more worried about it being ready to make as much freaking power as possible when you step back on the loud pedal as you come out of turn 2, not waiting the extra 100ms for all the cams to adjust etc. So in this scenario, realistically you tune the motor to make power, based on the load. People will then play with things like throttle response, and drive by wire mapping to get it more "driveable".   Funnily enough, I was watching something Finnegans Garage, and he has a huge blown Hemi in a 9 second 1955 Chev that is road registered. To make it more driveable on the road recently, they started testing blocking up the intake with kids footballs, to effectively reduce air flow when they're on the road, and make the throttle less touchy and more driveable. Plus some other weird shit the yankee aftermarket ECUs do. Made me think of Kinks R34...
    • I do this, I also don't get the joke  
×
×
  • Create New...