Jump to content
SAU Community

Hypergear Turbochargers and High flow Services Development thread


Recommended Posts

I cant get VCT working unless I buy a VCT intake cam and a new VCT solenoid and gear. I have previously had too much hassle with getting VCT to work in my SR so I threw it away and put non VCT cams in my car.

I am very happy with the delivery as it is anyway. Going to keep it as is and just want to go finish my tune.

Man there are a lot of people out there with your highflows who use their cars for PROPER motor sport duties. That is crazy :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I cant get VCT working unless I buy a VCT intake cam and a new VCT solenoid and gear. I have previously had too much hassle with getting VCT to work in my SR so I threw it away and put non VCT cams in my car.

I am very happy with the delivery as it is anyway. Going to keep it as is and just want to go finish my tune.

Man there are a lot of people out there with your highflows who use their cars for PROPER motor sport duties. That is crazy :)

Cheap reliable turbo that can be rebuilt cheaply in AUS. Also cause he's always working on improving his products can't go wrong

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Newly designed exhaust wheel finally out of the furnaces today. This particular one was from the 407rwkws SS3 prototype with a Dia of 66mm. Will be making the turbine shaft and friction weld them in the next few days. This wheel is also made to improve the exhaust side flow ability with current bolton ATR43 series turbochargers, without adding additional lag.

exhaustwheel.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks good Stao :)

Took a few quick photos of my turbo today, first time I've had time to even look at it since it got back here.

Might get some better photos tomorrow but in the mean time heres some photos off my phone:

20130827_195141_zpsd7a3b7d0.jpg

20130827_195149_zps486ed2b5.jpg

Happy with the way it looks, Can't wait t osee it on the car. I have no excuses now that the turbo is back to not get started on this engine

Thanks again Stao for making this happen :)

Edited by 89CAL
Link to comment
Share on other sites

SS2

:ph34r:

Yeah was an SS2CB, one of Stao's original ones produced not long after the prototype (If memory serves me correctly?)

It's been too long since I actually got the turbo. Need to put motor in car and stop making excuses

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Those are the current SS turbochargers, I'm particularly interested in the result of the SS1PU as the latest compressor has made a difference in stabilizing upper rev boost level as well as the turbo's response.

My test rig will be down graded using standard exhaust manifold and internal gate, based on the completion of the SS4 Alpha development. From there I will obtain further data based on the performance of our latest SS turbochargers internally gated, In which should archive a much better out come then what I've originally archived few years ago.

Lastly, internally gated SS Alpha turbochargers are under construction, means a new range of big power, responsive and easy fitment turbo options will soon be available for Rb25det engines.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stao do you think there would be much benefit for me to change to your new profile? As noted I will be heading back to the dyno soon so I should make the most of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After some trailing and testing with using the G4 chra the housing type and profile bell shapes are pretty much set to optimum for a Rb25det engine. So far this is the most responsive 3582 equivalent turbocharger I've trailed. Obviously it will be a controlled run finding out what my cam behaviors are and gathering data for the SS4 alpha series to run against.

Trent and Cat just had their fun in China and now back to work. My dyno run is booked in for tomorrow, and hopefully things will run smoothly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's controlled run from today. The maximum power reached was 445rwkws with 25psi @ 4500RPMs.

power.jpg

boost.jpg

^^^

Boost level comparison result from previous run using the same turbocharger.

No, its not responsive for a daily, how ever not bad considering the peek power it managed. This is our base run using standard cast compressor wheel, my billet wheel versions will be act against the result above, and the desired out come would be for better power and response. 460rwkws with 25psi by 4300RPM would be a nice goal to reach

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That graph looks mental straight up after 4000rpm

will be awesome to drive if it got traction

Goes from 100rwkw at 4000rpm to 325rwkw in a few hundred rpm

If these turbos could handle big boost 30psi+ you could be onto a winner for those after big power

decent response simalar to the precision turbo range

Should be well over 500rwkw at over 30psi if it can handle it but you would need the supporting mods to test it more fuel

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That power level would be very fast at the drags

You should try winding the boost up and test it out at the strip

Is that turbo still internal gate and single scroll?

Just re read it still cast comp wheel and no vnt yet

With a billet comp should be even better but I'm not sure about the vnt might choke it up top restricting power

But it's definately heading in the right direction

Edited by hy_rpm
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is running VNT, hence the difference in response. Thats on the high mount, external gate and e85. for some reason the boost curve appears laggier on paper then on road. I can see my boost gauge sitting at 15psi at 4000RPM 4th gear on the high way. Since its just a controlled test so never mind as long as the billet series works better.

If I can get rid of 300rpms of lag it would be sweet as for a daily.

Definitely very fast, I need to a 4WD system to put all of those on the road.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all, I need to get this HKS SLD attached to my stock ECU because I've now got the German autobahn and faster European circuits to contend with.  The car is a manual 2dr ER34 with an AT ECU and I've realised the AT ECU has two pins for speed sensor signals: Pin 29: Vehicle speed sensor signal (Vehicle speed sensor 2) Pin *58: Output shaft rotation sensor signal (Vehicle speed sensor 1) - *RB25DET A/T model only Before I go butchering this harness, is anyone sure of which pin is the correct one for signal adjustment? The attached document from HKS indicates pin 29 but I found this situation mentioned in the following thread on a different forum (R34 GTT Auto Trans Speed Cut Problem | Zerotohundred) mentioning pin 58 needing to be altered by member zephuros, albeit it seems to be for an RSM-GP and the info appears to be old.  R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-2.pdf R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-3.pdf R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-1.pdf HKS SLD Vehicle Pin out P59-P70 ER34-pages.pdf
    • Embrace the freedom of casual encounters on the best dating app in town! Verified Maidens Superlative Сasual Dating
    • Slimline sub on the rear parcel shelf is doable. Pioneer TS-WX140DA is only 70mm high.   
    • People like Johnny Dose Bro might be laughing at my post because I accidentally added 100mm to my numbers. 350-355 is indeed the lower limit. 450 is off-road Skyline spec.
    • What is the "compromise" that you think will happen? Are you thinking that something will get damaged? The only things you have to be concerned about with spherical jointed suspension arms are; Arguments with the constabulary wrt their legality (they are likely to be illegal for road use without an engineering certificatation, and that may not be possible to obtain). A lot more NVH transmitted through to the passengers (which is hardly a concern for those with a preference for good handling, anyway). Greatly increased inspection and maintenance requirements (see above points, both).   It is extremely necessary to ask what car you are talking about. Your discussion on strut tops, for example, would be completely wrong for an R chassis, but be correct for an S chassis. R32s have specific problems that R33/4 do not have. Etc. I have hardened rubber bushes on upper rear control arms and traction rods. Adjustable length so as to be able to set both camber and bump steer. You cannot contemplate doing just the control arms and not the traction arms. And whatever bushing you have in one you should have in the other so that they have similar characteristics. Otherwise you can get increased oddness of behaviour as one bushing flexes and the other doesn't, changing the alignment between them. I have stock lower rear arms with urethane bushes. I may make changes here, these are are driven by the R32's geometry problems, so I won't discuss them here unless it proves necessary. I have spherical joints in the front caster rods. I have experienced absolutely no negatives and only positives from doing so. They are massively better than any other option. I have sphericals in the FUCAs, but this is driven largely by the (again) R32 specific problems with the motion of those arms. I just have to deal with the increased maintenance required. Given how much better the front end behaves with the sphericals in there.....I'd probably be tempted to go away from my preference (which is not to have sphericals on a road car, for 2 of the 3 reasons in the bulleted list above), just to gain those improvements. And so my preference for not using sphericals (in general) on a road car should be obvious. I use them judiciously, though, as required to solve particular problems.
×
×
  • Create New...