Jump to content
SAU Community

Hypergear Turbochargers and High flow Services Development thread


Recommended Posts

Yes can be done. I have done a evaluation few years ago, the SL2 turbine wheel is made for external gating. It didn't work as well as the SS2 or the OP6 high flow in terms of boost control and peek power.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And how you asume that the new SS2 will be compared to the OP6 in terms of torque and response. The way i look at it, it seems that the OP6 delivers more torque then a old ss2 and about the same power, if i got it right ;):)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's say that you have the throttle 1/3 open and you're trying to maintain some boost pressure in the manifold (with your right foot) that is somewhat lower than the maximum boost that your boost control setup is able to give you.

Let's now consider that the signal driving the wastegate is from that (low pressure) intake manifold and therefore the wastegate is going to be clamped shut. This is exactly what the boost control system is expected to do when confronted with lower than target pressure on the signal line. So now the turbo is going to be spooling hard, driving the pressure in the pipework to some really high pressure, which is being dropped across the throttle. "So what?" you might say. Well, what if you drive the compressor across the surge line? Will that be fun? What if you pop an intercooler hose off a pipe (that you wouldn't have done if it wasn't seeing 35 psi inside)?

Etc etc. There are a number of good reasons for not sourcing the actuation signal from the plenum.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's the point, you want to work the turbo to give you the flat boost or targeted amount thus post intercooler but pre throttle is more desirable for a pressure source

No the number of psi going to the wastegate is irrelevant if you have a boost controller (Link controlled Mac valve in my case). The point of putting it on the compressor housing is to have quick response.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's the point, you want to work the turbo to give you the flat boost or targeted amount thus post intercooler but pre throttle is more desirable for a pressure source

No the number of psi going to the wastegate is irrelevant if you have a boost controller (Link controlled Mac valve in my case). The point of putting it on the compressor housing is to have quick respon

I have mine like Johnny said, in the charge pipe like factory R33 has it and I found much better boost control with my AVCR. I'll get my Haltech to do it one day

Link to comment
Share on other sites

one last question here, just trying to figure out which turbo I'd like to purchase. Someone sell me either one on their experiences

Pros and Cons

Rough power figures for these two turbos

ATR45 vs ATR433SS3

Edit: I should add I'd like to see 300kw+ on 98octane

Edited by thommo458
Link to comment
Share on other sites

one last question here, just trying to figure out which turbo I'd like to purchase. Someone sell me either one on their experiences

Pros and Cons

Rough power figures for these two turbos

ATR45 vs ATR433SS3

Edit: I should add I'd like to see 300kw+ on 98octane

I'm making 290 with the ATR45 - Restriction is said to be cooler. I believe the ATR45 will push well past the 300s and makes great torque. Check out my build thread for details.Should give you plenty of room to go more than 300 but it's quite laggy on 98 but once it comes on it's nuts. I believe the 43 should be less laggy but have less headroom

Edited by kingtube69
Link to comment
Share on other sites

the SS3 is made for external gating. for internally gated and 300rwkws+ bolton, The atr45SAT is a better turbo. Alternatively for 260~300rwkws region, you can use our ATR43SS2 for better response.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all, I need to get this HKS SLD attached to my stock ECU because I've now got the German autobahn and faster European circuits to contend with.  The car is a manual 2dr ER34 with an AT ECU and I've realised the AT ECU has two pins for speed sensor signals: Pin 29: Vehicle speed sensor signal (Vehicle speed sensor 2) Pin *58: Output shaft rotation sensor signal (Vehicle speed sensor 1) - *RB25DET A/T model only Before I go butchering this harness, is anyone sure of which pin is the correct one for signal adjustment? The attached document from HKS indicates pin 29 but I found this situation mentioned in the following thread on a different forum (R34 GTT Auto Trans Speed Cut Problem | Zerotohundred) mentioning pin 58 needing to be altered by member zephuros, albeit it seems to be for an RSM-GP and the info appears to be old.  R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-2.pdf R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-3.pdf R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-1.pdf HKS SLD Vehicle Pin out P59-P70 ER34-pages.pdf
    • Embrace the freedom of casual encounters on the best dating app in town! Verified Maidens Superlative Сasual Dating
    • Slimline sub on the rear parcel shelf is doable. Pioneer TS-WX140DA is only 70mm high.   
    • People like Johnny Dose Bro might be laughing at my post because I accidentally added 100mm to my numbers. 350-355 is indeed the lower limit. 450 is off-road Skyline spec.
    • What is the "compromise" that you think will happen? Are you thinking that something will get damaged? The only things you have to be concerned about with spherical jointed suspension arms are; Arguments with the constabulary wrt their legality (they are likely to be illegal for road use without an engineering certificatation, and that may not be possible to obtain). A lot more NVH transmitted through to the passengers (which is hardly a concern for those with a preference for good handling, anyway). Greatly increased inspection and maintenance requirements (see above points, both).   It is extremely necessary to ask what car you are talking about. Your discussion on strut tops, for example, would be completely wrong for an R chassis, but be correct for an S chassis. R32s have specific problems that R33/4 do not have. Etc. I have hardened rubber bushes on upper rear control arms and traction rods. Adjustable length so as to be able to set both camber and bump steer. You cannot contemplate doing just the control arms and not the traction arms. And whatever bushing you have in one you should have in the other so that they have similar characteristics. Otherwise you can get increased oddness of behaviour as one bushing flexes and the other doesn't, changing the alignment between them. I have stock lower rear arms with urethane bushes. I may make changes here, these are are driven by the R32's geometry problems, so I won't discuss them here unless it proves necessary. I have spherical joints in the front caster rods. I have experienced absolutely no negatives and only positives from doing so. They are massively better than any other option. I have sphericals in the FUCAs, but this is driven largely by the (again) R32 specific problems with the motion of those arms. I just have to deal with the increased maintenance required. Given how much better the front end behaves with the sphericals in there.....I'd probably be tempted to go away from my preference (which is not to have sphericals on a road car, for 2 of the 3 reasons in the bulleted list above), just to gain those improvements. And so my preference for not using sphericals (in general) on a road car should be obvious. I use them judiciously, though, as required to solve particular problems.
×
×
  • Create New...