Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

This is a prototype ATR43 G4 520HP CHRA. It runs on shortened bearings and weigh reduced turbine for maximum response. engineered to produce about 300rwkws at 20psi on .63 ATR43's turbine housing using RB25det engine with supporting mods.

The smaller one on the photo is ATR43 G1 350HP CHRA. Its made for 240rwkws with excellent street response.

3.jpg

5.jpg

1.jpg

2.jpg

4.jpg

Compare to ATR28G4 it has lighter turbine with shorter bearings. So it should have slightly better response. I might update this CHRA into the ATR28G4 once its been evaluated.

Turbine housing is getting made. I'm going to swap this 2x with my existing high flowing customers. probably Geraus and SS8_Gohan for some dyno and evaluation results.

For time been we will still be using proven ATR28 CHRAs. Price wise I don't know at this stage. depends on how much it cost to build the rear housing.

hi,

i skimmed through quickly but didnt find the exact answer i was looking for.

what turbo would you suggest is the most efficient/responsive for a Rb20(r32) wanting to make 240-250rwkw while keeping the stock manifold, but being externally gated.

thanks.

hi,

i skimmed through quickly but didnt find the exact answer i was looking for.

what turbo would you suggest is the most efficient/responsive for a Rb20(r32) wanting to make 240-250rwkw while keeping the stock manifold, but being externally gated.

thanks.

i went with a ATR28G3 with 0.63 internal gate rear for my rb20... i'm looking for a tad more power than you

so maybe look at a ATR28G2

hook us up Stao :P:ninja:

we going to need new dumps? and am i going to have to run stuff in again... done so much friggen running in with this car :P

EDIT: so are you saying these will be laggier or potentially, they might be a little more responsive and make a bit more power?

3.jpg

Nice love the pointy wheel. Hopping to see the complete turbo and some results soon.

ps.

would this punch a whole on my foot if I drop it upset down? :ninja:

Edited by kwickr33

Today got the turbine housing made. It is .86 in a T28 which is equivalent to a .63 in a T3x.

It is bolt on to stock T3x manifold and 6bolt dump.

th3.jpg

th2.jpg

th1.jpg

The Very first ATR43i 520HP G4 in T3 .64 Turbine is complete:

atr43f.jpg

atr43b.jpg

We'll be making few more different A/Red turbine housings in the next few weeks. We will also be engineering a 650HP profile CHRA to suit a .84 Bolton Rear housing.

Well stock turbo won't make 520HP. Bigger turbos will creat more lag. This is a G4 profile, made for 300rwkws.

We also have this in G1 and G2 profiles which are rated 350HP and 450HP. The G1 would have very similar response as the stock turbo to produce max of 240rwkws, G2 is about 300RPM laggier but but its good for upto 270rwkws.

Price wise This turbo is $1300 to complete. With normal Turbine housing which comes out in a Vband rear is $1050 internally gated. or $950 externally gated with a 5 bolt flange.

didn't i have a G2 originally? that was about 230rwkw at 15psi -

gotta remember, "most" people won't be bolting these onto built engines (IMO) - they'll chuck em on, run 15/16/17psi and that's probably about it. I'm only running a bit more boost because of E85, otherwise, 17psi would probably be my max.

will give you a call/email asap about the .63

Yes but that was in stock R33's turbine housing. Now they are running in a .63 T3x rear housing, The spec of it is very similar to a GT3071. So it should make around 260rwkws at 18psi of boost on 98 fuel

Yes but that was in stock R33's turbine housing. Now they are running in a .63 T3x rear housing, The spec of it is very similar to a GT3071. So it should make around 260rwkws at 18psi of boost on 98 fuel

do you also make this turbo with an externally gated rear housing?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Here is the mess that I made. That filler there was successful in filling dents in that area. But in the middle area. I can feel dents. And I've gone ocer it multiple times with filler. And the filler is no longer there because i accidently sanded it away. I've chased my tail on this job but this is something else lol. So I'm gonna attempt filler one more time and if it doesn't work I'll just high fill primer the door and see where the issues are because guidecoat is of no use atm.
    • Ok, so I think I sort of figured out where I went wrong. So I definitely overthinked it, and I over sanded, which is probably a large part of the problem. to fix it, I ended up tapping some spots that were likely to be high, made them low, filled them in, and I tackled small sections at a time, and it feels a lot better.    I think what confused me as well is you have the bare metal, and some spots darker and some are lighter, and when I run my finger across it, it' would feel like it's a low spot, but I think it's just a transition in different texture from metal to body filler.    When your finger's sliding on the body filler, and crosses over to the bare metal, going back and forth, it feels like it's a low spot. So I kept putting filler there and sanding, but I think it was just a transition in texture, nothing to do with the low or high spot. But the panel's feels a lot better, and I'm just going to end up priming it, and then I'll block it after with guide coat.   Ended up wasting just about all of my filler on this damn door lol  
    • -10 is plenty for running to an oil cooler. When you look at oil feeds, like power steering feeds, they're much smaller, and then just a larger hose size to move volume in less pressure. No need for -12. Even on the race cars, like Duncans, and endurance cars, most of them are all running -10 and everything works perfectly fine, temps are under control, and there's no restrictions.
    • Update: O2 sensor in my downpipe turned out to be faulty when I plugged in to the Haltech software. Was getting a "open circuit" warning. Tons of carbon buildup on it, probably from when I was running rich for a while before getting it corrected. Replaced with new unit and test drove again. The shuffle still happens, albeit far less now. I am not able to replicate it as reliably and it no longer happens at the same RPM levels as before. The only time I was able to hear it was in 5th going uphill and another time in 5th where there was no noticeable incline but applying more throttle first sped it up and then cleared it. Then once in 4th when I slightly lifted the throttle going over a bump but cleared right after. My understanding is that with the O2 sensor out, the ECU relies entirely on the MAP tune and isn't able to make its small adjustments based on the sensors reading. All in all, a big improvement, though not the silver bullet. Will try validating the actuators are set up correctly, and potentially setting up shop time to tune the boost controller on closed loop rather than the open loop it is set to now. Think if it's set up on closed loop to take the O2 reading, that should deal with these last bits. Will try to update again as I go. 
    • More so GReddy oil relocation kits, sandwich plates, etc. all use 10AN fittings. And same, I've only used 10AN and my car sees track work (circuit, doing laps, not 10 sec squirt business).
×
×
  • Create New...