Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 48
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Well like I said its got a different wheel for greater flow instead of response.

I'll be driving this car for a while before I would be comfortably building it for any one in case of any problems. If this works out well we will be able to do that to all OP6 turbine housings.

For the time been we will still be carry with standard and .82 rear ended PU high flows.

i think the result is impressive and on par with alot of 3076 results.

its making nearly 200kw at the 4000rpm mark which is well and truly on par, and it ramps on nice. considering the final output is also near enough to 300kw, for something that will bolt on and be very close to stock like appearance, i think we have a few too many whingers in this thread.

please take note of my reference to the words 'i think' and note that it is my personal opinion that you are whingers, to which i am entitled :cool:

lets not forget the value either!

LOL! this power is unbeliaable guys. Soon this turbo will be on mine! Guys Tao took me for a drive in this with the turbo on and it was just AMAZING! it was so torquay!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

sure it wasn't queenscliff?

Another Dr-Drift dyno run cut off early...rev it harder Sam :ninja:

They are still nosing over after 5500 though stao...badly

Stao's rear tires are not the 'grippiest' and we have been fully booked out... I was just doing him a favour and squeezing in a few runs to see if we could monitor and control boost. If this was a full tune we would have certainly strapped it in, played with with cam timing, etc etc...

ok fair enough then :P

As said about though, it does look a little lazy coming onto boost..but that could just be the ramp rate aswel.

Ramp of 13kph/s

Awesome results, but i'm really concerned about the manifold pressures. I want to know if you guys are monitoring the manifold pressures whilst holding the gate closed with the actuator stopper? im worried about excessive pressure doing damage long term (exhaust valves and rear turbine).

Agreed, I've had many discussions with Stao regarding going beyond what I recommend, and to his credit he's prepared to push the limit, learn along the way, and try new ideas. I would certainly not recommend anyone to push these turbos, or any turbo to their limits, without carefull monitoring and understanding of vitals.

Sam.

This version of PU high flow plus the SS-2 prototype is an example of pushing few factors to its limit in exchange for the most out standing response, and power.

First time you've ever seen 295rwkws with .63 turbine housing holding straight 18psi to red line with internal gate, or 250rwkws with 18psi < 2500RPM of a SS-2 right?

Experience, Materials, workmanship, knowledge, data, and engineering define certain extension of limit. There are no full definition of limits, and nothing is physically impossible. So we'll keep cracking.

Also we've done lots of researches and evaluations in parts and components that made up those 2x turbos that takes the edge. I will evaluate it for 100,000KMs with some data analyse. If every thing turns out in great order as expected then I will have no holding back and let our customers enjoy the benefit of the new concepts.

First time you've ever seen 295rwkws with .63 turbine housing holding straight 18psi to red line with internal gate

bombtrack got 297 with an I/G hks 2835 (.68) with drop in cams on an unopened RB25 on pulp on the chasers dyno... that's pretty close :)

First of all Good work.

I've personally seen this turbo before it was installed. Since Stao does not want to reveal the wheel sizes, its a 500HP rated CHRA in a .63 turbine housing. Which we've also seen Garrett GT3582 600HP CHRA in .63 turbines.

The exhaust manifold pressure and flow keeps the shaft spinning providing desired boost level. Any lose of exhaust manifold pressure or flow will result in boost drop. So wither you run a adjustable internal gate or an external gate, at 20psi the manifold pressure does not change.

If the components of the turbo is built to handle 20psi with decent tune then I don't believe it would cause any problems.

Edited by kwickr33

Pressure and flow are two different things altogether, The less exhaust manifold pressure the better.

As pressure builds up it fights against the spinning turbine wheel causing it to slow, hence boost drop off and high temps

The exhaust manifold pressure and flow keeps the shaft spinning providing desired boost level. Any lose of exhaust manifold pressure or flow will result in boost drop. So wither you run a adjustable internal gate or an external gate, at 20psi the manifold pressure does not change.

They are not talking about a drop in exhaust manifold pressure (that is what a wastegate effectively does to hold a consistent boost level). They are discussing too high exhaust manifold pressure caused by restricting the wastegate movement

Pressure and flow are two different things altogether, The less exhaust manifold pressure the better.

As pressure builds up it fights against the spinning turbine wheel causing it to slow, hence boost drop off and high temps

Actually as pressure builds in the exhaust manifold it pushes the turbine wheel faster and harder (this is why if we run a turbo without a exhaust manifold pressure release aka wastegate then turbos will run almost unlimited boost)... It also pushes harder back on the engine which is what is causing some people concern.

Actually as pressure builds in the exhaust manifold it pushes the turbine wheel faster and harder (this is why if we run a turbo without a exhaust manifold pressure release aka wastegate then turbos will run almost unlimited boost)... It also pushes harder back on the engine which is what is causing some people concern.

I know what you are saying there, but if the pressure cant escape fast enough (too much pressure in the turbine hosuing itself) than it will slow, due to the exhaust gas almost coming to a standstill because it has no where to go.

Which comes down to the turbine exducer sizing, dump pipes, wheel trims etc.

I cant see the exhaust gas coming to a standstill, it would be near supersonic. I see it as maximizing the turbo as the turbine will be at its maximum shaft speed. Yes it would be better to go to a larger housing but you pay the penalty of lag and that affects the best part of the powerband. How often are you at 7000 revs anyway?

So how much pressure is too much and how do you measure it? Perhaps it is good when the stock wastegates drop boost.

Yeah you can't see what the back pressure is doing by looking at a dyno plot - sometimes it can show up as the power falling over prematurely due to the tuner having to pull timing to avoid detonation before MBT. Funnily enough this dyno plot looks like what you could expect to see in that case, if it weren't for the claim that the early drop off is due to wheelspin. Silly rolling road dynos...

Will be interesting to see how it goes on a hub dyno, and how the engine/turbo lasts at that power level if its going to be used on the track at the power level at all?

At face value, very nice power level and spool for a convenient and affordable package :D

Didn't Mafia make over 300wkw with a .63a/r GT3076R?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Murray_Calavera  If I were an expert I wouldn't be in here looking for assistance.  I am extremely computer literate, have above average understanding on how things should be working and how they should tie together.  If I need to go to a professional tuner so be it, but I'd much rather learn and do things myself even if it means looking for some guidance along the way and blowing up a few engines. @GTSBoy  I was hoping it would be as simple as a large vacuum leak somewhere but I'm unable to find anything, all lines seem to be well capped or going where they need to be, and when removed there is vacuum felt on the tube.  It would be odd for the Haltech built in MAP to be faulty, the GTT tune I imported had it enabled from the start, I incorrectly assumed it was reading a signal from the stock MAP, but that doesn't exist.  After running a vacuum hose to the ECU the signal doesn't change more than 0.2 in either direction.   I'll probably upload a video of my settings tomorrow, as it stands I'm able to daily drive, but getting stuttering when giving it gas from idle, so pulling away from lights is a slow process of revving it up and feathering the clutch until its moving, then it will accelerate fine.  It sounds like I need to get to the bottom of the manifold pressure issue, but the ignition timing section is most intimidating to me and will probably let a pro do that part.  Tomorrow I'll try a different vacuum line to T off of, with any luck I selected one that was already bypassed during the DBW swap. @feartherb26  I do have +T in the works but wanted to wait until Spring to start with that swap since this is my good winter AWD vehicle.  When removing the butterfly, did it leave a bunch of holes in the manifold that you needed to plug?  I thought about removing it but assumed it would be a mess.   I notice no difference when capping the vacuum line to it or letting it do its thing.  This whole thing has convinced me to just get a forward facing manifold when the time comes though.
    • Update: tested my spark plugs that are supposed to be 5ohms with a 10% deviation and one gave me a 0 ohms reading and the rest were 3.9ohm<, so one bad and the others on their way out.
    • 9" wheels are a little too wide for a RWD 32. They can fit. People have put R33 GTR wheels on 32s for years and years. But they are a very tight squeeze. This has been known for about 30 years. As I said - there is no difference between a 17 and an 18 in terms of what will fit. The rolling diameter needs to stay about the same as stock - not very much larger. If you increase that, you will start to have problems. If you increae rolling diamater at the same time as yo increase width, you will have problems earlier. as 9" wheels are pushing the boundaries already, you would need to be careful with tyre choice. I would put 8.5s on the front of mine, but would expect problems with 9s.
    • post up screen shots of your injector tables
    • Diagnostic flow for a code 21 says check signal at the ECU pins, on a voltmeter of some kind it should read 0.1V at idle, 0.12V cranking, 0.15-0.25V at 2000 rpm. Check each coil such that +1, -3 is infinite or very high resistance, -3, +2 should do the same. (-1, +3), (+3, -2), (+1, -2), and (-1, +2) should all be somewhere between 0 ohms and high resistance. If you trace the path from the coil pin all the way back to the ECU in the diagram the resistance you measure at the coil vs connected to the harness should be pretty much the same. 
×
×
  • Create New...